Skip to content

linkerlin/Nuitka

 
 

Repository files navigation

.. contents::

Usage
=====

Requirements
------------

- C++ Compiler: You need a compiler with support for C++03

  Currently this means, you need to use either of these compilers:

  * GNU g++ compiler of at least version 4.4

  * The clang compiler on MacOS X or FreeBSD, based on LLVM version 3.2

  * The MinGW compiler on Windows

  * Visual Studion 2008 and 2010 on Windows

- Python: Version 2.6, 2.7 or 3.2, 3.3 (partially)

  You need CPython to execute Nuitka, because itis tightly bound to the
  reference implementation of Python, called "CPython".

  .. note::

     The created binaries can be made executable independent of the Python
     installation, with ``--portable`` option.

- Operating System: Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, MacOS X, and Windows (32/64 bits),

  Others may work as well. The portability is expected to be generally good, but
  the Scons usage may have to be adapted.

- Architectures: x86, x86_64 (amd64), and arm.

  Other architectures may also work, these are just the only ones
  tested. Feedback is welcome.

Command Line
------------

No environment variable changes are needed, you can call the ``nuitka`` and
``nuitka-python`` scripts directly without any changes to the environment. You
may want to add the ``bin`` directory to your ``PATH`` for your convenience, but
that step is optional.

Nuitka has a ``--help`` option to output what it can do:

.. code-block:: bash

    nuitka --help

The ``nuitka-python`` command is the same as ``nuitka``, but with different
defaults. It tries to compile and directly execute a Python script:

.. code-block:: bash

    nuitka-python --help

These options with different defaults are ``--exe`` and ``--execute``, so it is
somewhat more similar to what plain ``python`` will do.

Use Cases
=========

Use Case 1 - Program compilation with all modules embedded
----------------------------------------------------------

If you want to compile a whole program recursively, and not only the single file
that is the main program, do it like this:

.. code-block:: bash

    nuitka-python --recurse-all program.py

.. note::

   The is more fine grained control than ``--recurse-all`` available. Consider
   the output of ``nuitka-python --help``.

In case you have a plugin directory, i.e. one which is not found by recursing
after normal import statements (recommended way), you can always require that a
given directory shall also be included in the executable:

.. code-block:: bash

    nuitka-python --recurse-all --recurse-directory=plugin_dir program.py

.. note::

   If you don't do any dynamic imports, setting your ``PYTHONPATH`` at
   compilation time will be sufficient for all your needs normally. Use
   ``--recurse-directory`` only if you make ``__import__()`` calls that Nuitka
   cannot predict, because they e.g. depend on command line parameters. Nuitka
   also warns about these, and point to the option.

.. note::

   The resulting binary still depends on CPython and used C extension modules
   being installed. If you want to be able to copy it to another machine, use
   ``--portable`` and copy the generated "_python" directory and "_python.zip"
   archives as well.

Use Case 2 - Extension Module compilation
-----------------------------------------

If you want to compile a single extension module, all you have to do is this:

.. code-block:: bash

    nuitka some_module.py

The resulting file "some_module.so" can then be used instead of
"some_module.py". It's left as an exercise to the reader, what happens if both
are present.

.. note::

   The option ``--recurse-all`` and other variants work as well.

Use Case 3 - Package compilation
--------------------------------

If you need to compile a whole package and embedded all modules, that is also
feasible, use Nuitka like this:

.. code-block:: bash

    nuitka some_package --recurse-directory=some_package

.. note::

   The recursion into the package directory needs to be provided manually,
   otherwise the package is empty. Data files located inside the package will
   not be embedded yet.

Where to go next
================

Remember, this project is not completed yet. Although the CPython test suite
works near perfect, there is still more work needed, to make it do more
optimization. Try it out.

Subscribe to its mailing lists
------------------------------

Please visit the `mailing list page
<http://www.nuitka.net/pages/mailinglist.html>`_ in order to subscribe the
relatively low volume mailing list. All Nuitka issues can be discussed there.

Report issues or bugs
---------------------

Should you encounter any issues, bugs, or ideas, please visit the `Nuitka bug
tracker <http://bugs.nuitka.net>`_ and report them.

Contact me via email with your questions
----------------------------------------

You are welcome to `contact me via email <mailto:Kay.Hayen@gmail.com>`_ with
your questions.

Word of Warning
---------------

Consider using this software with caution. Your feedback and patches to Nuitka
are very welcome.

Especially report it please, if you find that anything doesn't work, because the
project is now at the stage that this should not happen.


Join Nuitka
===========

You are more than welcome to join Nuitka development and help to complete the
project in all minor and major ways.

The development of Nuitka occurs in git. We currently have these 2 branches:

- `master <http://nuitka.net/gitweb/?p=Nuitka.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master>`_:

  This branch contains the stable release to which only hotfixes for bugs will
  be done. It is supposed to work at all times and is supported.

- `develop <http://nuitka.net/gitweb/?p=Nuitka.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/develop>`_:

  This branch contains the ongoing development. It may at times contain little
  regressions, but also new features. On this branch the integration work is
  done, whereas new features might be developed on feature branches.

.. note::

   I accept patch files, git formated patch queues, and git pull requests. I
   will do the integration work. If you base your work on "master" or "develop"
   at any given time, I will do any re-basing required and keep your authorship
   intact.

.. note::

   The Developer Manual explains the coding rules, branching model used, with
   feature branches and hotfix releases, the Nuitka design and much
   more. Consider reading it to become a contributor. This document is intended
   for Nuitka users.

Donations
=========

Should you feel that you cannot help Nuitka directly, but still want to support,
please consider `making a donation <http://nuitka.net/pages/donations.html>`_
and help this way.

Unsupported functionality
=========================

The ``co_code`` attribute of code objects
-----------------------------------------

The code objects are empty for for native compiled functions. There is no
bytecode with Nuitka's compiled function objects, so there is no way to provide
it.

Threading can block it seems
----------------------------

Bug tracker link: `"Threading is not supported, never yields the execution to
other threads" <http://bugs.nuitka.net/issue10>`_

The generated code never lets the CPython run time switch threads, so its
chances to do so are reduced, which may lead to dead lock problems.

.. note::

   There is an option ``--experimental`` which adds support for it. Future
   versions will support threading.


Start of function call vs. end of function call in traceback output
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Bug tracker link: `"In tracebacks Nuitka uses start of call line, whereas
CPython uses end of call line" <http://bugs.nuitka.net/issue9>`_

In CPython the traceback points to the end of the function call, whereas in
Nuitka they point to the first line of the function call.

This is due to the use of the ``ast.parse`` over bytecode it seems and not easy
to overcome. It would require parsing the Python source on our own and search
for the end of the function call.

Maybe someone will do it someday. Help is welcome.

We can consider making the compatible behaviour optional, and use it for the
tests only as the called expression clearly is more useful to see then the
closing brace.


Optimization
============

Constant Folding
----------------

The most important form of optimization is the constant folding. This is when an
operation can be predicted. Currently Nuitka does these for some builtins (but
not all yet), and it does it for binary/unary operations and comparisons.

Constants currently recognized:

.. code-block:: python

    5 + 6     # operations
    5 < 6     # comparisons
    range(3)  # builtins

Literals are the one obvious source of constants, but also most likely other
optimization steps like constant propagation or function inlining will be. So
this one should not be underestimated and a very important step of successful
optimizations. Every option to produce a constant may impact the generated code
quality a lot.

Status: The folding of constants is considered implemented, but it might be
incomplete. Please report it as a bug when you find an operation in Nuitka that
has only constants are input and is not folded.

Constant Propagation
--------------------

At the core of optimizations there is an attempt to determine values of
variables at run time and predictions of assignments. It determines if their
inputs are constants or of similar values. An expression, e.g. a module variable
access, an expensive operation, may be constant across the module of the
function scope and then there needs to be none, or no repeated module variable
look-up.

Consider e.g. the module attribute ``__name__`` which likely is only ever read,
so its value could be predicted to a constant string known at compile time. This
can then be used as input to the constant folding.

.. code-block:: python

   if __name__ == "__main__":
      # Your test code might be here
      use_something_not_use_by_program()

From modules attributes, only ``__name__`` is currently actually optimized. Also
possible would be at least ``__doc__``.

Also builtins exception name references are optimized if they are uses as module
level read only variables:

.. code-block:: python

   try:
      something()
   except ValueError: # The ValueError is a slow global name lookup normally.
      pass

Builtin Call Prediction
-----------------------

For builtin calls like ``type``, ``len``, or ``range`` it is often possible to
predict the result at compile time, esp. for constant inputs the resulting value
often can be precomputed by Nuitka. It can simply determine the result or the
raised exception and replace the builtin call with it allowing for more constant
folding or code path folding.

.. code-block:: python

   type( "string" ) # predictable result, builtin type str.
   len( [ 1, 2 ] )  # predictable result
   range( 3, 9, 2 ) # predictable result
   range( 3, 9, 0 ) # predictable exception, range hates that 0.

The builtin call prediction is considered implemented. We can simply during
compile time emulate the call and use its result or raised exception. But we may
not cover all the builtins there are yet.

Sometimes builtins should not be predicted when the result is big. A ``range()``
call e.g. may give too big values to include the result in the binary. Then it
is not done.

.. code-block:: python

   range( 100000 ) # We do not want this one to be expanded

Status: This is considered mostly implemented. Please file bugs for built-ins
that are predictable but are not computed by Nuitka at compile time.

Conditional Statement Prediction
--------------------------------

For conditional statements, some branches may not ever be taken, because of the
conditions being possible to predict. In these cases, the branch not taken and
the condition check is removed.

This can typically predict code like this:

.. code-block:: python

   if __name__ == "__main__":
      # Your test code might be here
      use_something_not_use_by_program()

or

.. code-block:: python

   if False:
      # Your deactivated code might be here


It will also benefit from constant propagations, or enable them because once
some branches have been removed, other things may become more predictable, so
this can trigger other optimization to become possible.

Every branch removed makes optimization more likely. With some code branches
removed, access patterns may be more friendly. Imagine e.g. that a function is
only called in a removed branch. It may be possible to remove it entirely, and
that may have other consequences too.

Status: This is considered implemented, but for the maximum benefit, more
constants needs to be determined at compile time.

Exception Propagation
---------------------

For exceptions that are determined at compile time, there is an expression that
will simply do raise the exception. These can be propagated, collecting
potentially "side effects", i.e. parts of expressions that must still be
executed.

Consider the following code:

.. code-block:: python

   print side_effect_having() + (1 / 0)
   print something_else()

The ``(1 / 0)`` can be predicted to raise a ``ZeroDivisionError`` exception,
which will be propagated through the ``+`` operation. That part is just Constant
Propagation as normal.

The call to ``side_effect_having`` will have to be retained though, but the
print statement, can be turned into an explicit raise. The statement sequence
can then be aborted and as such the ``something_else`` call needs no code
generation or consideration anymore.

To that end, Nuitka works with a special node that raises an exception and has
so called "side_effects" children, yet can be used in generated code as an
expression.

Status: The propagation of exceptions is implemented on a very basic level. It
works, but exceptions will not propagate through all different expression and
statement types. As work progresses or examples arise, the coverage will be
extended.

Exception Scope Reduction
-------------------------

Consider the following code:

.. code-block:: python

    try:
        b = 8
        print range( 3, b, 0 )
        print "Will not be executed"
    except ValueError, e:
        print e

The try block is bigger than it needs to be. The statement ``b = 8`` cannot
cause a ``ValueError`` to be raised. As such it can be moved to outside the try
without any risk.

.. code-block:: python

    b = 8
    try:
        print range( 3, b, 0 )
        print "Will not be executed"
    except ValueError, e:
        print e

Status: Not yet done yet. The infrastructure is in place, but until exception
block inlining works perfectly, there is not much of a point.

Exception Block Inlining
------------------------

With the exception propagation it is then possible to transform this code:

.. code-block:: python

    try:
        b = 8
        print range( 3, b, 0 )
        print "Will not be executed"
    except ValueError, e:
        print e

.. code-block:: python

    try:
        raise ValueError, "range() step argument must not be zero"
    except ValueError, e:
        print e

Which then can be reduced by avoiding the raise and catch of the exception,
making it:

.. code-block:: python

   e = ValueError( "range() step argument must not be zero" )
   print e

Status: This is not implemented yet.

Empty branch removal
--------------------

For loops and conditional statements that contain only code without effect, it
should be possible to remove the whole construct:

.. code-block:: python

   for i in range( 1000 ):
       pass

The loop could be removed, at maximum it should be considered an assignment of
variable ``i`` to ``999`` and no more.

Another example:

.. code-block:: python

   if side_effect_free:
      pass

The condition should be removed in this case, as its evaluation is not
needed. It may be difficult to predict that ``side_effect_free`` has no side
effects, but many times this might be possible.

Status: This is not implemented yet.

Unpacking Prediction
--------------------

When the length of the right hand side of an assignment to a sequence can be
predicted, the unpacking can be replaced with multiple assignments.

.. code-block:: python

   a, b, c = 1, side_effect_free(), 3

.. code-block:: python

   a = 1
   b = side_effect_free()
   c = 3

This is of course only really safe if the left hand side cannot raise an
exception while building the assignment targets.

We do this now, but only for constants, because we currently have no ability to
predict if an expression can raise an exception or not.

Status: Not really implemented, and should use ``mayHaveSideEffect()`` to be
actually good at things.

Builtin Type Inference
----------------------

When a construct like ``in xrange()`` or ``in range()`` is used, it is possible
to know what the iteration does and represent that, so that iterator users can
use that instead.

I consider that:

.. code-block:: python

    for i in xrange(1000):
        something(i)

could translate ``xrange(1000)`` into an object of a special class that does the
integer looping more efficiently. In case ``i`` is only assigned from there,
this could be a nice case for a dedicated class.

Status: Future work, not even started.

Quicker function calls
----------------------

Functions are structured so that their parameter parsing and ``tp_call``
interface is separate from the actual function code. This way the call can be
optimized away. One problem is that the evaluation order can differ.

.. code-block:: python

   def f( a, b, c ):
       return a, b, c

   f( c = get1(), b = get2(), a = get3() )

This will evaluate first get1(), then get2() and then get3() and then make the
call.

In C++ whatever way the signature is written, its order is fixed.

Therefore it will be necessary to have a staging of the parameters before making
the actual call, to avoid an re-ordering of the calls to get1(), get2() and
get3().

To solve this, we may have to create wrapper functions that allow different
order of parameters to C++.

Status: Not even started.


Credits
=======

Contributors to Nuitka
----------------------

Thanks go to these individuals for their much valued contributions to
Nuitka. Contributors have the license to use Nuitka for their own code even if
Closed Source.

The order is sorted by time.

- Li Xuan Ji: Contributed patches for general portability issue and enhancements
  to the environment variable settings.

- Nicolas Dumazet: Found and fixed reference counting issues, import work,
  improved some of the English and generally made good code contributions all
  over the place, code generation TODOs, tree building cleanups, core stuff.

- Khalid Abu Bakr: Submitted patches for his work to support MinGW and Windows,
  debugged the issues, and helped me to get cross compile with MinGW from Linux
  to Windows. This was quite a difficult stuff.

- Liu Zhenhai: Submitted patches for Windows support, making the inline Scons
  copy actually work on Windows as well. Also reported import related bugs, and
  generally helped me make the Windows port more usable through his testing and
  information.

- Christopher Tott: Submitted patches for Windows, and general as well as
  structural cleanups.

- Pete Hunt: Submitted patches for MacOS X support.

- ownssh: Submitted patches for builtins module guarding, and made massive
  efforts to make high quality bug reports.

Projects used by Nuitka
-----------------------

* The `CPython project <http://www.python.org>`_

  Thanks for giving us CPython, which is the base of Nuitka. We are nothing
  without it.

* The `GCC project <http://gcc.gnu.org>`_

  Thanks for not only the best compiler suite, but also thanks for supporting
  C++11 which helped to get Nuitka off the ground. Your compiler was the first
  usable for Nuitka and with little effort.

* The `Scons project <http://www.scons.org>`_

  Thanks for tackling the difficult points and providing a Python environment to
  make the build results. This is such a perfect fit to Nuitka and a dependency
  that will likely remain.

* The `valgrind project <http://valgrind.org>`_

  Luckily we can use Valgrind to determine if something is an actual improvement
  without the noise. And it's also helpful to determine what's actually
  happening when comparing.

* The `NeuroDebian project <http://neuro.debian.net>`_

  Thanks for hosting the build infrastructure that the Debian and sponsor
  Yaroslav Halchenko uses to provide packages for all Ubuntu versions.

* The `openSUSE Buildservice <http://openbuildservice.org>`_

  Thanks for hosting this excellent service that allows us to provide RPMs for a
  large variety of platforms and make them available immediately nearly at
  release time.

* The `MinGW project <http://www.mingw.org>`_

  Thanks for porting the best compiler to Windows. This allows portability of
  Nuitka with relatively little effort.

* The `mingw-cross-env project <http://mingw-cross-env.nongnu.org>`_

  Thanks for enabling us to easily setup a cross compiler for my Debian that
  will produce working Windows binaries.

* The `Wine project <http://www.winehq.org>`_

  Thanks for enabling us to run the cross compiled binaries without have to
  maintain a windows installation at all.

.. header::

   Nuitka - User Manual

.. footer::

   |copy| Kay Hayen, 2013 | Page ###Page### of ###Total### | Section ###Section###

.. |copy|   unicode:: U+000A9

Updates for this Manual
=======================

This document is written in REST. That is an ASCII format which is readable as
ASCII, but used to generate PDF or HTML documents.

You will find the current source under:
http://nuitka.net/gitweb/?p=Nuitka.git;a=blob_plain;f=README.txt

And the current PDF under:
http://nuitka.net/doc/README.pdf

About

Official mirror of Nuitka as from http://nuitka.net

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published