Skip to content

Using machine learning, a system capable of different tweet classification ( fake or not ) has been developed.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

cusmuliucgeorgiana/FakeTwitterDetection

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

26 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Distributed Twitter News Identification using SVM, Naive Bayes and Random Forest

Using machine learning, a system capable of different tweet classification ( fake or not ) has been developed.

OUR VM SETTINGS:

  • 4 CPU cores
  • 4 GB RAM
  • SSD
  • UBUNTU 16.04 LTS
  • PYTHON 3
  • PYSPARK version 2.3.0
  • Scala version 2.11.8
  • OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, 1.8.0_171

GOOGLE SETTINGS:

  • one DataProc cluster with three machines: one master and two slaves

  • master n1-standard-2 (2 vCPU, 7.50 GB memory)

  • worker n1-standard-4 (4 vCPU, 15.0 GB memory)

  • disk 500 GB

  • UBUNTU 16.04 LTS

  • PYTHON 3

  • PYSPARK version 2.3.0

  • Scala version 2.11.8

  • OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, 1.8.0_171

  • we also tested with 10 workers and very high hardware resources but the results were about the same, no noticeable improvement

Introduction

Today, using Facebook and Twitter for news information is something usual, users from these networks create a lot of content: posts (with text, images, videos, links), comments, likes, but also redistribution of information with retweet option or with simple copy/paste operations thus a common problem is the detection of fake users or fake news. The present work aims to analyze different techniques of detecting fake news, their performance and how we can do fine tuning in order to improve the actual results.

About

Using machine learning, a system capable of different tweet classification ( fake or not ) has been developed.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Python 93.5%
  • Shell 4.8%
  • Makefile 1.7%