Skip to content

1player/wordcount

 
 

Repository files navigation

wordcount

Counting words in different programming languages.

See the article on this project: http://juditacs.github.io/2015/11/26/wordcount.html

Leaderboard

Updated: 07-12-2015 20:00

On 5 million lines from the Hungarian Wikipedia:

Notes:

  • New 2nd place, a clever Python implementation by @gaborszabo88
  • improved Perl, Julia and Javascript versions
  • removed two C++ versions
  • NodeJS runs out of memory (16GB is not enough) - fixed by @szelpe
  • a faster C# (mono) version added by @szelpe
  • Golang took over Python and is now 2nd place - congrats @siklosid
  • Haskell version by @larion
  • further test are run only on the Hungarian Wikipedia, the other tables are deprecated
Rank Experiment CPU seconds User time Maximum memory Contributor
1 cpp/wc_vector 34.21 32.73 772048 @juditacs
2 python/wordcount_py2gabor.py 36.93 35.69 596792 @gaborszabo88
3 go/bin/wordcount 40.92 39.37 856128 @siklosid
4 python/wordcount_py2.py 66.65 64.68 1433152 @juditacs
5 java -classpath java WordCount 79.92 68.17 1799236 @DavidNemeskey
6 cpp/wc_baseline_hash 85.8 70.14 971720 @juditacs
7 mono csharp/WordCountList.exe 100.69 71.01 900496 @szelpe
8 perl/wordcount.pl 103.82 101.63 1237776 @larion
9 python/wordcount_py3.py 105.08 102.45 1241144 @juditacs
10 php php/wordcount.php 135.94 118.29 2119284 @bpatrik
11 julia julia/wordcount.jl 143.81 140.8 2558176
12 bash/wordcount.sh 280.79 287.16 11564 @juditacs
13 haskell/WordCount 290.53 285.36 4208920 @larion
14 nodejs javascript/wordcount.js 702.88 701.76 985500 @kundralaci

Not updated

On the full Hungarian Wikisource:

Rank Experiment CPU seconds User time Maximum memory
1 cpp/wc_vector 15.75 11.65 245316
2 cpp/wc_hash_nosync 18.81 15.02 327184
3 python/wordcount_py2.py 20.02 19.58 554352
4 cpp/wc_baseline_hash 24.23 20.45 343276
5 java -classpath java WordCount 27.37 31.39 545940
6 java -classpath java WordCountEntries 28.13 32.23 540276
7 python/wordcount_py3.py 33.06 32.59 482988
8 cpp/wc_baseline 35.1 31.25 355692
9 perl/wordcount.pl 39.15 38.66 447000
10 php php/wordcount.php 39.82 35.58 781668
11 nodejs javascript/wordcount.js 72.93 67.14 1005116
12 bash/wordcount.sh 82.36 93.9 12924
13 julia julia/wordcount.jl 94.46 93.51 725232

On a smaller dataset:

Rank Experiment CPU seconds User time Maximum memory
1 cpp/wc_vector 6.82 4.68 125856
2 cpp/wc_hash_nosync 8.04 6.07 163404
3 python/wordcount_py2.py 8.68 8.48 280616
4 cpp/wc_baseline_hash 10.18 8.14 171656
5 java -classpath java WordCount 13.56 15.66 404064
6 java -classpath java WordCountEntries 13.8 15.77 398768
7 cpp/wc_baseline 13.9 12.0 178084
8 python/wordcount_py3.py 14.14 13.86 245164
9 php php/wordcount.php 15.16 13.15 396516
10 perl/wordcount.pl 17.04 16.79 225352
11 nodejs javascript/wordcount.js 27.9 24.93 577472
12 bash/wordcount.sh 34.92 40.51 10768

The task

The task is to split a text and count each word's frequency, then print the list sorted by frequency in decreasing order. Ties are printed in alphabetical order.

Rules

  • the input is read from STDIN
  • the input is always encoded in UTF-8
  • output is printed to STDOUT
  • break only on space, tab and newline (do not break on non-breaking space)
  • do not write anything to STDERR
  • the output is tab-separated
  • sort by frequency AND secondary sort in alphabetical order
  • try to write simple code with few dependencies
    • standard library
  • single-thread is preferred but you can add multi-threaded or multicore versions too

The output should contain lines like this:

freqword <tab> freq

Example

$ echo "apple pear apple art" | python2 python/wordcount.py
apple   2
art     1
pear    1

Test corpus: Hungarian Wikisource

scripts/create_input.sh downloads the latest Hungarian Wikisource XML dump. Why Wikisource? It's not too small not too large and more importantly, it's valid utf8. Why Hungarian? There are many non-ascii characters and the number of different word types is high.

Usage

To test on a small sample:

time cat data/huwikisource-latest-pages-meta-current.xml | head -10000 | python3 python/wordcount_py3.py > python_out

Using the provided scripts

Installation

There are two ways to install all the dependencies:

  1. Build a Docker image with the provided Dockerfile, which installs all the required packages.

  2. Install them manually via a package manager. The Docker image is an Ubuntu image but the same packages work for me on Manjaro Linux as well. Use this command on Ubuntu to install all dependencies, but be prepared for a lot of new packages. You've been warned.

    sudo apt-get install wget gcc python npm perl php5 git default-jdk time

Docker image

You can run the experiment in a Docker container. The Dockerfile is provided, run:

docker build -t wordcount --rm .

This might take a while.

Load the image into a container:

docker run -it wordcount bash

You should see the cloned directory in /root

cd wordcount

Downloading the dataset

bash scripts/create_input.sh

Compile/build/whatever the wordcount scripts

bash scripts/build.sh

Run tests on one language

scripts/test.sh runs all tests for one language, well actually for a single command.

bash scripts/test.sh "python2 python/wordcount_py2.py"

Or

bash scripts/test.sh python/wordcount_py2.py

if the file is executable and has a valid shebang line.

The script either prints OK or the list of failed tests and a final FAIL.

Run tests on all languages

All commands are listed in the file run_commands.txt and the script scripts/test_all.sh runs test.sh with each command:

bash scripts/test_all.sh

Run the actual experiment on a larger dataset

If all tests are passed, the scripts work reasonably well. This does not mean that all output will be the same, see the full test later. For now, we consider them good enough for testing.

This command will run each test twice and save the results to results.txt.

bash scripts/compare.sh data/huwikisource-latest-pages-meta-current.xml 2

Or test it on a part of huwikisource:

bash scripts/compare.sh <( head -10000 data/huwikisource-latest-pages-meta-current.xml) 1

Results.txt in a tab separated file that can be formatted to a Markdown table with this command:

cat results.txt | python2 scripts/evaluate_results.py

This scripts prints the fastest run for each command in a markup table like this:

Experiment CPU seconds User time Maximum memory
cpp/wc_vector 2.68 2.37 32168
python/wordcount_py2.py 2.68 2.61 71512
bash/wordcount.sh 3.0 4.19 10820

Adding a new program

Adding a new programming language or a new version for an existing programming language consists of three steps:

  1. add dependencies to the Dockerfile. Basically add the package to the existing apt-get package list.
  2. if it needs compiling or any other setup method, add it to scripts/build.sh
  3. add the actual invoke command to run_commands.txt

Adding your program to this experiment

  1. Make sure all dependencies are installed via standard packages and your code compiles.
  2. Your code passes all the tests.
  3. Make sure it runs for less than two minutes for 100,000 lines of text. If it is slower, it doesn't make much sense to add it.

Old notes for manual building and running

Javascript

Nodejs and npm are needed. Install dependencies:

cd javascript
npm install

Run:

node index.js

BASH

Set the LC_COLLATE variable to C to consider non-alphanumeric characters when sorting:

export LC_COLLATE=C

Run:

time zcat de.gz | bash wordcount.sh > bash_out

Java

Usage:

javac WordCount.java
time cat de | java WordCount > wc.java

The JVM startup can be measured by e.g.

time echo "Hello" | java WordCount

TODO

  • compare full output on each language
    • which one should be the oraculum?

About

Counting words in different programming languages.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Java 14.7%
  • C++ 12.5%
  • Shell 11.5%
  • C# 11.4%
  • PHP 11.2%
  • Python 11.1%
  • Other 27.6%