def list_kind_triggers_append_instead_of_overwrite(self):
# TODO: when put this way it makes the API look pretty strange;
# maybe a sign we should switch to explicit setter methods
# (selected on kind, perhaps) instead of using an implicit setter
a = Argument("mylist", kind=list)
assert a.value == []
a.value = "val1"
assert a.value == ["val1"]
a.value = "val2"
assert a.value == ["val1", "val2"]
def incrementable_True_triggers_increment_of_default(self):
a = Argument("verbose", kind=int, default=0, incrementable=True)
assert a.value == 0
# NOTE: parser currently just goes "Argument.takes_value is false?
# Gonna stuff True/False in there." So this looks pretty silly out
# of context (as with list-types above.)
a.value = True
assert a.value == 1
for _ in range(4):
a.value = True
assert a.value == 5
def list_kind_test_for_empty_list_value(self):
arg = Argument("a", kind=list)
assert not arg.got_value
arg.value = "append-me"
assert arg.got_value
def non_list_kind_tests_for_None_value(self):
arg = Argument("a")
assert not arg.got_value
arg.value = "something"
assert arg.got_value
def transformed_appears_as_dot_value_with_original_as_raw_value(self):
"transformed, modified value is .value, original is .raw_value"
a = Argument("a", kind=int)
a.value = "5"
assert a.value == 5
assert a.raw_value == "5"
def untransformed_appears_as_dot_value(self):
"untransformed, appears as .value"
a = Argument("a", kind=str)
a.value = "foo"
assert a.value == "foo"
def available_as_dot_raw_value(self):
"available as .raw_value"
a = Argument("a")
a.value = "foo"
assert a.raw_value == "foo"