def _file_conflict_is_permitted(self, left, right, filename):
"""
Returns True if rpm would allow both the given packages to share
ownership of the given filename.
"""
if not hasattr(rpm, 'files'):
return self._file_conflict_is_permitted_rpm411(
left, right, filename)
ts = rpm.TransactionSet()
ts.setVSFlags(rpm._RPMVSF_NOSIGNATURES)
left_hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(open(left.lookup_location()[0], 'rb'))
right_hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(open(self.download_package(right), 'rb'))
left_files = rpm.files(left_hdr)
right_files = rpm.files(right_hdr)
if left_files[filename].matches(right_files[filename]):
logger.debug(
'Conflict on %s between %s and %s permitted because files match',
filename, left, right)
return True
if left_files[filename].color != right_files[filename].color:
logger.debug(
'Conflict on %s between %s and %s permitted because colors differ',
filename, left, right)
return True
return False
def test_conflict_is_ignored_if_file_colors_are_different(request, dir_server):
# This is part of RPM's multilib support. If two packages own the same file
# but the file color is different in each, the preferred color wins (and
# there is no conflict). This lets both .i386 and .x86_64 packages own
# /bin/bash while installing only the .x86_64 version.
p2 = rpmfluff.SimpleRpmBuild('a', '0.1', '1', ['i386', 'x86_64'])
p2.add_simple_compilation(installPath='usr/bin/thing')
baserepo = rpmfluff.YumRepoBuild([p2])
baserepo.make('i386', 'x86_64')
dir_server.basepath = baserepo.repoDir
p1 = rpmfluff.SimpleRpmBuild('a', '0.2', '1', ['i386', 'x86_64'])
p1.add_simple_compilation(installPath='usr/bin/thing')
p1.make()
def cleanUp():
shutil.rmtree(baserepo.repoDir)
shutil.rmtree(p2.get_base_dir())
shutil.rmtree(p1.get_base_dir())
request.addfinalizer(cleanUp)
# Make sure we really have different files with different colors
# (this was surprisingly hard to get right)
rpmheader_32 = p1.get_built_rpm_header('i386')
rpmheader_64 = p1.get_built_rpm_header('x86_64')
if hasattr(rpm, 'files'): # rpm 4.12+
assert 1 == rpm.files(rpmheader_32)['/usr/bin/thing'].color
assert 2 == rpm.files(rpmheader_64)['/usr/bin/thing'].color
else: # sad old rpm < 4.12
fi_32 = rpm.fi(rpmheader_32)
while fi_32.FN() != '/usr/bin/thing':
fi_32.next()
assert fi_32.FColor() == 1
fi_64 = rpm.fi(rpmheader_64)
while fi_64.FN() != '/usr/bin/thing':
fi_64.next()
assert fi_64.FColor() == 2
exitcode, out, err = run_rpmdeplint([
'rpmdeplint', 'check-conflicts',
'--repo=base,{}'.format(dir_server.url),
p1.get_built_rpm('i386')
])
assert exitcode == 0
def test_conflict_is_ignored_if_file_colors_are_different(request, dir_server):
# This is part of RPM's multilib support. If two packages own the same file
# but the file color is different in each, the preferred color wins (and
# there is no conflict). This lets both .i386 and .x86_64 packages own
# /bin/bash while installing only the .x86_64 version.
p2 = rpmfluff.SimpleRpmBuild('a', '0.1', '1', ['i386', 'x86_64'])
p2.add_simple_compilation(installPath='usr/bin/thing')
baserepo = rpmfluff.YumRepoBuild([p2])
baserepo.make('i386', 'x86_64')
dir_server.basepath = baserepo.repoDir
p1 = rpmfluff.SimpleRpmBuild('a', '0.2', '1', ['i386', 'x86_64'])
p1.add_simple_compilation(installPath='usr/bin/thing')
p1.make()
def cleanUp():
shutil.rmtree(baserepo.repoDir)
shutil.rmtree(p2.get_base_dir())
shutil.rmtree(p1.get_base_dir())
request.addfinalizer(cleanUp)
# Make sure we really have different files with different colors
# (this was surprisingly hard to get right)
rpmheader_32 = p1.get_built_rpm_header('i386')
rpmheader_64 = p1.get_built_rpm_header('x86_64')
if hasattr(rpm, 'files'): # rpm 4.12+
assert 1 == rpm.files(rpmheader_32)['/usr/bin/thing'].color
assert 2 == rpm.files(rpmheader_64)['/usr/bin/thing'].color
else: # sad old rpm < 4.12
fi_32 = rpm.fi(rpmheader_32)
while fi_32.FN() != '/usr/bin/thing':
fi_32.next()
assert fi_32.FColor() == 1
fi_64 = rpm.fi(rpmheader_64)
while fi_64.FN() != '/usr/bin/thing':
fi_64.next()
assert fi_64.FColor() == 2
exitcode, out, err = run_rpmdeplint(['rpmdeplint', 'check-conflicts',
'--repo=base,{}'.format(dir_server.url),
p1.get_built_rpm('i386')])
assert exitcode == 0
def _file_conflict_is_permitted(self, left, right, filename):
"""
Returns True if rpm would allow both the given packages to share
ownership of the given filename.
"""
if not hasattr(rpm, 'files'):
return self._file_conflict_is_permitted_rpm411(left, right, filename)
ts = rpm.TransactionSet()
ts.setVSFlags(rpm._RPMVSF_NOSIGNATURES)
left_hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(open(left.lookup_location()[0], 'rb'))
right_hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(open(self.download_package(right), 'rb'))
left_files = rpm.files(left_hdr)
right_files = rpm.files(right_hdr)
if left_files[filename].matches(right_files[filename]):
logger.debug('Conflict on %s between %s and %s permitted because files match',
filename, left, right)
return True
if left_files[filename].color != right_files[filename].color:
logger.debug('Conflict on %s between %s and %s permitted because colors differ',
filename, left, right)
return True
return False
def _check_rpm(self, repo, rpm_dir, rpm_file, test_name):
"""Check the contents of the rpm against the expected test results
"""
ts = rpm.TransactionSet()
fd = os.open(os.path.join(rpm_dir, rpm_file), os.O_RDONLY)
hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(fd)
os.close(fd)
self.assertEqual(hdr[rpm.RPMTAG_NAME].decode("UTF-8"), repo["rpmname"])
self.assertEqual(hdr[rpm.RPMTAG_VERSION].decode("UTF-8"), repo["rpmversion"])
self.assertEqual(hdr[rpm.RPMTAG_RELEASE].decode("UTF-8"), repo["rpmrelease"])
self.assertEqual(hdr[rpm.RPMTAG_URL].decode("UTF-8"), repo["repo"])
files = sorted(f.name for f in rpm.files(hdr) if stat.S_ISREG(f.mode))
self.assertEqual(files, [os.path.join(repo["destination"], f) for f in self.test_results[test_name]])
def read_rpm(filename):
rpm.addMacro("_dbpath", os.path.join(dirname(__file__), "fake_pkg_db"))
rpm.addMacro("_topdir", dirname(__file__))
ts = rpm.TransactionSet(
".", rpm.RPMVSF_MASK_NODIGESTS | rpm.RPMVSF_MASK_NOSIGNATURES)
fd = rpm.fd.open(filename)
header = ts.hdrFromFdno(fd)
# hdr[rpm.RPMTAG_NAME] = "test_rpm"
# fo = os.fdopen(fd, "w+")
# hdr.write(fd)
print(header[rpm.RPMTAG_NAME])
files = rpm.files(header)
payload = rpm.fd.open(fd, flags=header["payloadcompressor"])
archive = files.archive(payload, write=False)
for t in archive:
if t.fflags & rpm.RPMFILE_SPECFILE:
od = os.open(t.name, os.O_RDWR | os.O_CREAT)
archive.readto(od)
print(t.name)
def spec_from_srpm(srpm_path):
ts = rpm.ts()
fd = rpm.fd.open(srpm_path)
try:
hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(fd)
if not hdr.isSource():
raise ValueError('Not an SRPM: {}'.format(srpm_path))
files = rpm.files(hdr)
payload = rpm.fd.open(fd,
flags=bytes(hdr['PAYLOADCOMPRESSOR']).decode())
try:
archive = files.archive(payload)
for f in archive:
if f.fflags & rpm.RPMFILE_SPECFILE:
return archive.read()
finally:
rpm.fd.close(payload)
finally:
rpm.fd.close(fd)
raise ValueError('No spec file found in SRPM: {}'.format(srpm_path))
def _check_rpm(self, repo, rpm_dir, rpm_file, test_name):
"""Check the contents of the rpm against the expected test results
"""
ts = rpm.TransactionSet()
fd = os.open(os.path.join(rpm_dir, rpm_file), os.O_RDONLY)
hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(fd)
os.close(fd)
self.assertEqual(hdr[rpm.RPMTAG_NAME], repo["rpmname"])
self.assertEqual(hdr[rpm.RPMTAG_VERSION], repo["rpmversion"])
self.assertEqual(hdr[rpm.RPMTAG_RELEASE], repo["rpmrelease"])
self.assertEqual(hdr[rpm.RPMTAG_URL], repo["repo"])
files = sorted(f.name for f in rpm.files(hdr) if stat.S_ISREG(f.mode))
self.assertEqual(files, [
os.path.join(repo["destination"], f)
for f in self.test_results[test_name]
])
# / should never be included in the rpm, doing so conflicts with the filesystem package
self.assertFalse(any(True for f in files if f == "/"))