def q1():
"""GDA """
"""Run the Gaussian Discriminant Analysis on the spambase data. Use the k-folds from the previous problem (1 for testing, k-1 for training, for each fold)
Since you have 57 real value features, each of the 2gaussians (for + class and for - class) will have a mean vector with 57 components, and a they will have
either a common (shared) covariance matrix size 57x57. This covariance is estimated from all training data (both classes)
or two separate covariance 57x57 matrices (estimated separately for each class)
(you can use a Matlab or Python of Java built in function to estimated covariance matrices, but the estimator is easy to code up).
Looking at the training and testing performance, does it appear that the gaussian assumption (normal distributed data) holds for this particular dataset?
"""
spamData = hw3.pandas_to_data(hw3.load_and_normalize_spambase()) # returns an array of arrays - this is by row
k = 10
train_acc_sum = 0
k_folds = hw3.partition_folds(spamData, k)
gdas = []
for ki in range(k - 1):
subset = []
gda = hw3.GDA()
X, truth = hw3.separate_X_and_y(k_folds[ki])
covariance_matrix = hw3.get_covar(X)
gda.p_y = float(sum(truth)) / len(truth)
gda.train(X, covariance_matrix, truth)
predictions = gda.predict(X)
#print predictions
accuracy = mystats.get_error(predictions, truth, True)
#gdas.append(gda)
print_output(ki, accuracy)
#print gda.prob
gdas.append(gda)
def test_separate_x_and_y():
array = get_test_data(5, 3)
print array
print hw3.separate_X_and_y(array)
