def test_elected_candidates_returns_the_correct_order(self):
"""
Check that candidates with more votes are returned ahead of candidates
with fewer votes
"""
vacancies = 2
candidates = ('Back Bacon', 'Streaky Bacon', 'Peanut')
votes = (
('Peanut', ),
('Back Bacon', ),
('Back Bacon', ),
('Back Bacon', ),
('Streaky Bacon', ),
('Streaky Bacon', ),
('Streaky Bacon', ),
('Streaky Bacon', ),
)
expected_order = ['Streaky Bacon', 'Back Bacon']
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
self.assertEqual(expected_order, stv_round.elected_candidates())
def test_bulk_eliminiation_resolves_tied_loser_failures(self):
votes = (('A', 'D'), ('A', 'D'), ('B', 'E'), ('B', 'E'), ('C', 'F'),
('C', 'F'), ('C', 'F'), ('D', ), ('D', ), ('D', ), ('D', ),
('D', ), ('D', ), ('D', ), ('D', ), ('E', ), ('E', ), ('E', ),
('E', ), ('E', ), ('E', ), ('E', ), ('E', ), ('E', ), ('E', ),
('E', ), ('E', ), ('F', ), ('F', ), ('F', ), ('F', ), ('F', ),
('F', ), ('F', ), ('F', ), ('F', ), ('F', ), ('F', ), ('F', ),
('F', ))
candidates = ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F']
vacancies = 2
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round.run()
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {},
'continuing': {
'D': 8,
'E': 12,
'F': 13
},
'excluded': {
'A': 2,
'B': 2,
'C': 3
},
}
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv_round.results())
def test_candidates_with_surplus_is_ordered(self):
"""
We want the method under test to return a list of candidates whose
total votes exceed the quota, and that list of candidates to be
ordered, highest votes first.
With 3 seats available and the following votes:
Mars: 3
Bounty: 6
Galaxy: 8
Crunchie: 2
We have a quota of 5 and expect Galaxy and Bounty to be returned as
candidates with surplus, in that order.
"""
votes = (('Mars', ), ('Mars', ), ('Mars', ), ('Bounty', ),
('Bounty', ), ('Bounty', ), ('Bounty', ), ('Bounty', ),
('Bounty', ), ('Galaxy', ), ('Galaxy', ), ('Galaxy', ),
('Galaxy', ), ('Galaxy', ), ('Galaxy', ), ('Galaxy', ),
('Galaxy', ), ('Crunchie', ), ('Crunchie', ))
candidates = ('Mars', 'Bounty', 'Galaxy', 'Crunchie')
seats = 3
expected_candidates = ['Galaxy', 'Bounty']
stv_round = Round(seats, candidates, votes)
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
candidates_with_surplus = map(lambda c: c.candidate_id,
stv_round._candidates_with_surplus())
self.assertEqual(expected_candidates, candidates_with_surplus)
def test_bulk_exclusion_does_not_leave_too_few_candidates(self):
"""
In the case where bulk exclusion would cause there to be too few
remaining candidates for the vacancies avaible, it should not
happen, and only the lowest should be excluded.
In this example there are 6 candidates for 4 vacancies.
Bulk exclusion would knock off the bottom three, meaning that only
three candidates were available for the remaining 4 places. In this
case, we do not apply bulk exclusion.
This means that "What I Loved" and "Gone Girl" both have a chance of
being elected, despite being terrible books.
"""
votes = 17 * (('A Suitable Boy', ), ) + \
12 * (('Farewell My Lovely', ), ) + \
2 * (('What I Loved', ), ) + \
1 * (('Gone Girl', ), )
candidates = [
'A Suitable Boy', 'Farewell My Lovely', 'What I Loved',
'The Da Vinci Code', 'Angels and Demons', 'Gone Girl'
]
vacancies = 4
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
bulk_exclusions = stv_round._bulk_exclusions()
self.assertTrue(len(bulk_exclusions) == 0)
def test_provisionally_elect_candidates_auto_fills_vacancies(self):
"""
If there are as many remaining vacancies as remaining candidates then
all remaining candidates should be elected even if they don't meet the
quota.
In this example, the quota is 3 votes and we expected candidate C to be
elected even though they only have 2 votes.
"""
votes = (('A', ), ('A', ), ('A', ), ('A', ), ('B', ), ('B', ), ('B', ),
('C', ), ('C', ))
candidates = ('A', 'B', 'C')
vacancies = 3
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
expected_totals = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'A': 4,
'B': 3,
'C': 2
},
'continuing': {},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(expected_totals, stv_round.results())
def test_provisionally_elect_candidates(self):
"""
Tests that candidates at or above the quota are marked as provisionally elected
"""
votes = (('A', ), ('A', ), ('A', ), ('A', ), ('B', ), ('B', ), ('B', ),
('C', ))
candidates = ('A', 'B', 'C')
vacancies = 2
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
expected_totals = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'A': 4,
'B': 3
},
'continuing': {
'C': 1
},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(expected_totals, stv_round.results())
def test_exclude_candidate_with_fewest_votes(self):
"""
Check that the method moves the candidate with the fewest vote total
to excluded
"""
votes = (('Chocolate', ), ('Chocolate', ), ('Chocolate', ),
('Chocolate', ), ('Fruit', ), ('Fruit', ), ('Vegetables', ))
candidates = ('Vegetables', 'Chocolate', 'Fruit')
vacancies = 2
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {},
'continuing': {
'Chocolate': 4,
'Fruit': 2
},
'excluded': {
'Vegetables': 1
}
}
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round._exclude_candidates_with_fewest_votes()
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv_round.results())
def test_calculate_initial_totals(self):
"""
Tests the initial assignment of votes
"""
votes = [
['Norm', 'Anna', 'Steve'],
['Dom', 'Anna', 'Steve', 'Norm', 'Amy'],
['Dom', 'Steve', 'Norm', 'Anna'],
['Norm', 'Steve', 'Amy', 'Anna', 'Dom'],
['Anna', 'Amy', 'Steve', 'Norm', 'Dom'],
['Anna', 'Steve', 'Norm', 'Amy', 'Dom'],
['Anna', 'Dom', 'Steve', 'Norm'],
['Norm', 'Steve', 'Dom', 'Anna', 'Amy'],
['Anna', 'Norm', 'Steve', 'Dom', 'Amy'],
['Anna', 'Norm', 'Steve'],
]
candidates = ['Dom', 'Anna', 'Steve', 'Norm', 'Amy']
seats = 3
results = Round(seats, candidates, votes).results()
expected_totals = {
'Dom': 2,
'Anna': 5,
'Norm': 3,
'Steve': 0,
'Amy': 0,
}
self.assertEqual(expected_totals, results['continuing'])
def test_all_vacancies_filled_should_be_false_after_incomplete_round(self):
"""
After a round runs that fails to elect enough candidates the round
should report that it has not filled all vacancies.
"""
vacancies = 2
candidates = ('Red', 'Green', 'Blue', 'Yellow', 'Mauve')
votes = 5 * (('Red', ), ) + \
4 * (('Green', ), ) + \
3 * (('Blue', ), ) + \
2 * (('Yellow', ), ) + \
1 * (('Mauve', ), )
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round.run()
self.assertFalse(stv_round.all_vacancies_filled())
def test_reallocate_fractional_votes(self):
"""
This is the case where a candidates second preferences are split
between other candidates so fractions of votes are reallocated
"""
votes = [
['Amy', 'James'],
['Amy', 'James'],
['Amy', 'James'],
['Amy', 'James'],
['Amy', 'David'],
['Amy', 'David'],
['Amy', 'David'],
]
candidates = ['Amy', 'James', 'David']
vacancies = 2
expected_result = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Amy': 3
},
'continuing': {
'James': Fraction(16, 7),
'David': Fraction(12, 7)
},
'excluded': {}
}
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
stv_round._reassign_votes_from_candidate_with_highest_surplus()
self.assertEqual(expected_result, stv_round.results())
def test_reallocation_of_surplus_votes(self):
"""
A single round should reallocate surplus votes from all candidates that
have a surplus and then exclude the candidate with the fewest votes.
"""
vacancies = 3
candidates = ('Oranges', 'Apples', 'Pears', 'Lemons', 'Limes')
votes = 9 * (('Oranges', 'Pears'), ) + \
8 * (('Apples', 'Lemons'), ) + \
1 * (('Lemons', ), )
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Oranges': 5,
'Apples': 5
},
'continuing': {
'Pears': 4,
'Lemons': 4
},
'excluded': {
'Limes': 0
}
}
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round.run()
print stv_round.quota
print stv_round.results()
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv_round.results())
def test_quota(self):
"""
Tests a simple quota case. Quota should be 10 / (3 + 1) + 1 => 3
"""
votes = [['Red', 'Blue', 'Green'] for i in range(0, 10)]
quota = Round(3, ('Red', 'Blue', 'Green'), votes).quota
self.assertEqual(3, quota)
def test_reallocation_of_votes_skips_provisionally_elected_candidates(
self):
"""
When multiple candidates have been provisionally elected their surplus
votes needs to be reallocated for each of them in turn. When the
reallocation happens it should skip over the other candidates that have
already been provisionally elected.
"""
vacancies = 3
candidates = ('Anna', 'Amy', 'Steve', 'Norm', 'Dom')
votes = 5 * (('Anna', 'Norm', 'Amy'), ) + \
3 * (('Norm', 'Amy'), ) + \
2 * (('Amy', ), )
# Both Anna and Norm should be elected initially
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Anna': 5,
'Norm': 3
},
'continuing': {
'Amy': 2,
'Dom': 0,
'Steve': 0
},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv_round.results())
# When we reallocate Anna's votes they should go straight to Amy,
# rather than going to Norm
stv_round._reassign_votes_from_candidate_with_highest_surplus()
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Anna': 3,
'Norm': 3
},
'continuing': {
'Amy': 4,
'Dom': 0,
'Steve': 0
},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv_round.results())
def test_tied_really_low_fewest_candidates_excludes_both(self):
"""
In this case, two candidates are tied for last place but they
have so few votes they couldn't win.
The calculation here is - if their votes added together are not enough
to reach the next candidate or the quota, we don't have to worry about
who to eliminate first and can eliminate both at the same time.
"""
votes = (('Beatles', ), ('Beatles', ), ('Beatles', ), ('Beatles', ),
('Beatles', ), ('Beatles', ), ('Beatles', ), ('Beatles', ),
('Beatles', ), ('Beatles', ), ('Beatles', ), ('Beatles', ),
('Rolling Stones', ), ('Rolling Stones', ),
('Rolling Stones', ), ('Rolling Stones', ),
('Rolling Stones', ), ('Rolling Stones', ),
('Rolling Stones', ), ('Rolling Stones', ),
('Rolling Stones', ), ('Killers', ), ('Killers', ),
('Killers', ), ('Killers', ), ('Killers', ), ('Blur', ),
('Blur', ), ('Pulp', ), ('Pulp', ))
candidates = ('Beatles', 'Rolling Stones', 'Killers', 'Blur', 'Pulp')
vacancies = 3
# Note that we expect them to be in continuing
# rather than provisionally elected as we are
# just calling the method, not the whole round
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {},
'continuing': {
'Beatles': 12,
'Rolling Stones': 9,
'Killers': 5,
},
'excluded': {
'Blur': 2,
'Pulp': 2
}
}
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round._exclude_candidates_with_fewest_votes()
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv_round.results())
def test_tied_fewest_candidates_throws_Failed_Election(self):
"""
If candidates are tied for last place, it throws a Failed
Election error. This is the case where they are not so
low that they can both be excluded.
"""
votes = (('Chocolate', ), ('Chocolate', ), ('Chocolate', ),
('Chocolate', ), ('Chocolate', ), ('Crisps', ), ('Crisps', ),
('Crisps', ), ('Crisps', ), ('Crisps', ), ('Popcorn', ),
('Popcorn', ), ('Popcorn', ), ('Popcorn', ), ('Fruit', ),
('Fruit', ), ('Fruit', ), ('Vegetables', ), ('Vegetables', ),
('Vegetables', ))
candidates = ('Vegetables', 'Chocolate', 'Fruit', 'Crisps', 'Popcorn')
vacancies = 3
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
with self.assertRaises(FailedElectionError):
stv_round._exclude_candidates_with_fewest_votes()
def test_exhausted_votes_are_not_reallocated(self):
"""
A vote with no further preferences for other candidates shouldn't be
reallocated. In this example Anna starts with 9 votes which means she
has 3 surplus votes above the quota of 6. Second preference choices for
Anna's votes are split equally between no preference, Steve and Norm.
Steve and Norm should get 1 vote each and the final vote should
disappear.
"""
votes = (
('Anna', ),
('Anna', ),
('Anna', ),
('Anna', 'Steve'),
('Anna', 'Steve'),
('Anna', 'Steve'),
('Anna', 'Norm'),
('Anna', 'Norm'),
('Anna', 'Norm'),
('Steve', ),
('Steve', ),
('Steve', ),
('Steve', ),
('Norm', ),
('Norm', ),
('Norm', ),
)
candidates = ('Anna', 'Steve', 'Norm')
vacancies = 2
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Anna': 6
},
'continuing': {
'Steve': 5,
'Norm': 4
},
'excluded': {}
}
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
stv_round._reassign_votes_from_candidate_with_highest_surplus()
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv_round.results())
def test_reallocate_surplus_votes(self):
"""
This test is where only one of the candidates has met the quota.
We are testing that their surplus votes are redistributed correctly.
"""
votes = [
['Green', 'Blue', 'Yellow', 'Red'],
['Green', 'Blue', 'Yellow', 'Red'],
['Green', 'Blue', 'Yellow', 'Red'],
['Green', 'Blue', 'Yellow', 'Red'],
['Green', 'Blue', 'Red', 'Yellow'],
['Green', 'Blue', 'Red', 'Yellow'],
['Green', 'Yellow', 'Red', 'Blue'],
['Green', 'Yellow', 'Red', 'Blue'],
['Green', 'Yellow', 'Blue', 'Red'],
['Red', 'Blue', 'Yellow', 'Green'],
['Red', 'Blue', 'Green', 'Yellow'],
['Blue', 'Green', 'Red', 'Yellow'],
['Blue', 'Yellow', 'Red', 'Green'],
['Yellow', 'Blue', 'Red', 'Green'],
['Yellow', 'Green', 'Red', 'Blue'],
['Yellow', 'Red', 'Green', 'Blue'],
['Yellow', 'Blue', 'Green', 'Red'],
]
candidates = ('Green', 'Blue', 'Yellow', 'Red')
vacancies = 2
expected_reallocated_totals = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Green': 6
},
'continuing': {
'Red': 2,
'Blue': 4,
'Yellow': 5
},
'excluded': {}
}
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
stv_round._reassign_votes_from_candidate_with_highest_surplus()
self.assertEqual(expected_reallocated_totals, stv_round.results())
def test_all_vacancies_filled_should_be_true_after_round_runs(self):
"""
Before a round has run it should report that all vacancies have not
been filled. After the round runs it should report that all vacancies
have been filled.
"""
vacancies = 2
candidates = ('Red', 'Green', 'Blue')
votes = 4 * (('Red', ), ) + \
3 * (('Green', ), )
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
self.assertFalse(stv_round.all_vacancies_filled())
stv_round.run()
self.assertTrue(stv_round.all_vacancies_filled())
def test_candidates_should_be_elected_once_there_is_one_per_vacanc(self):
"""
As soon as there are the same number of remaining candidates as
vacancies the election is completed with all of the remaining
candidates elected as winners.
Note that this makes it possible for a candidate to be elected even
without enough votes to reach the quota, as in this example.
Surplus votes for candidates A and B become exhausted votes because
there is no further preference to reallocate them to. Candidate D is
then excluded because they have the fewest votes. Since this leaves
only three candidates for three vacancies candidate C is declared
elected, even though they have only one vote compared to the quota of
three.
"""
vacancies = 3
candidates = ('A', 'B', 'C', 'D')
votes = 5 * (('A', 'B'), ) + \
4 * (('B', 'A'), ) + \
1 * (('C', ), )
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'A': 3,
'B': 3,
'C': 1
},
'continuing': {},
'excluded': {
'D': 0
},
}
stv = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
stv.run()
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv.results())
self.assertTrue(stv.all_vacancies_filled())
def test_tied_winners_should_cause_election_to_fail_without_a_random_generator(
self):
"""
When there's a tie between winners arbitrarily choosing one to
reallocate surplus from first may impact the election result. If a
random generator is not passed in then a FailedElectionError should be
thrown in cases of ambiguity.
When a random generator is provided it should be used to break ties of
winners. This test demonstrates both outcomes of a random tie being
broken by mocking two versions of a random generator.
"""
vacancies = 4
candidates = ('A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E')
votes = 9 * (('A', 'C'), ) + \
9 * (('B', 'C', 'D'), ) + \
3 * (('C', ), ) + \
2 * (('D', ), ) + \
3 * (('E', ), )
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
with self.assertRaises(FailedElectionError):
stv_round.run()
class MockRandom(object):
def choice(self, sequence):
return sequence[0]
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'A': 6,
'B': 6,
'C': 6,
'D': 5
},
'continuing': {},
'excluded': {
'E': 3
}
}
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes, random=MockRandom())
stv_round.run()
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv_round.results())
class MockRandom(object):
def choice(self, sequence):
return sequence[1]
expected_results = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'A': 6,
'B': 6,
'C': 6,
'E': 3
},
'continuing': {},
'excluded': {
'D': 2
}
}
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes, random=MockRandom())
stv_round.run()
self.assertEqual(expected_results, stv_round.results())
def test_reallocate_candidate_reaching_quota(self):
"""
This test steps through the run round algorithm, demonstrating
each step.
Only one candidate reaches the quota initially, but reallocation
causes another to reach quota and require reallocation of their now
surplus votes.
Note that this reallocation of Mars's now surplus votes requires their
devaluing to have been recorded, i.e. it's not 8 at the end of the
first iteration, it's 11 votes worth 8/11ths each.
"""
votes = [
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Crunchie'],
['Galaxy', 'Mars', 'Bounty'],
]
vacancies = 3
candidates = ['Mars', 'Bounty', 'Galaxy', 'Crunchie']
# At this stage, we have calculated initial totals but
# done no more work with the votes
stv_round = Round(vacancies, candidates, votes)
initial_totals = {
'provisionally_elected': {},
'continuing': {
'Mars': 0,
'Bounty': 0,
'Galaxy': 11,
'Crunchie': 0,
},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(initial_totals, stv_round.results())
# Now we run the first pass of calculating which
# candidates are provisionally elected
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
first_provisional_election_totals = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Galaxy': 11,
},
'continuing': {
'Mars': 0,
'Bounty': 0,
'Crunchie': 0,
},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(first_provisional_election_totals, stv_round.results())
# Now we reassign Galaxy's surplus votes to the
# next preferences of votes for Galaxy.
# Note that the 8 for Mars is actually 11 votes each worth 8/11ths.
stv_round._reassign_votes_from_candidate_with_highest_surplus()
first_reallocation_totals = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Galaxy': 3,
},
'continuing': {
'Mars': 8,
'Bounty': 0,
'Crunchie': 0,
},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(first_reallocation_totals, stv_round.results())
# After reallocation, we run a provisional election again to see if any
# new candidates have reached the quota
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
second_provisional_election_totals = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Galaxy': 3,
'Mars': 8,
},
'continuing': {
'Bounty': 0,
'Crunchie': 0,
},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(second_provisional_election_totals, stv_round.results())
# Now Mars has reached the quota, we need to reallocate
# Mars's surplus votes to the next preferences of votes
# for Mars.
# However, votes that have been allocated to Mars from Galaxy
# are not worth 1, they are worth 8/11 because of their
# previous reallocation from Galaxy.
stv_round._reassign_votes_from_candidate_with_highest_surplus()
second_reallocation_totals = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Galaxy': 3,
'Mars': 3,
},
'continuing': {
'Bounty': Fraction(5,11),
'Crunchie': 4 + Fraction(6, 11)
},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(second_reallocation_totals, stv_round.results())
# We now provisonally elect candidates again to see if anyone else has
# reached the quota - Crunchie has
stv_round._provisionally_elect_candidates()
third_provisional_election_total = {
'provisionally_elected': {
'Galaxy': 3,
'Mars': 3,
'Crunchie': 4 + Fraction(6, 11)
},
'continuing': {
'Bounty': Fraction(5,11),
},
'excluded': {}
}
self.assertEqual(third_provisional_election_total, stv_round.results())
# Now that we have three provisionally elected candidates for the three
# vacancies, the election is over
self.assertTrue(stv_round.all_vacancies_filled())
