def test_exceptions(self):
try:
math.sqrt(-1.0)
except ValueError:
pass
else:
self.fail("sqrt(-1) didn't raise ValueError")
def testSqrt(self):
self.assertRaises(TypeError, math.sqrt)
self.ftest('sqrt(0)', math.sqrt(0), 0)
self.ftest('sqrt(1)', math.sqrt(1), 1)
self.ftest('sqrt(4)', math.sqrt(4), 2)
self.assertEqual(math.sqrt(INF), INF)
self.assertRaises(ValueError, math.sqrt, NINF)
self.assertTrue(math.isnan(math.sqrt(NAN)))
def testSqrt(self):
self.assertRaises(TypeError, math.sqrt)
self.ftest('sqrt(0)', math.sqrt(0), 0)
self.ftest('sqrt(1)', math.sqrt(1), 1)
self.ftest('sqrt(4)', math.sqrt(4), 2)
self.assertEqual(math.sqrt(INF), INF)
self.assertRaises(ValueError, math.sqrt, NINF)
self.assertTrue(math.isnan(math.sqrt(NAN)))
def test_exceptions(self):
try:
x = math.exp(-1000000000)
except:
# mathmodule.c is failing to weed out underflows from libm, or
# we've got an fp format with huge dynamic range
self.fail("underflowing exp() should not have raised "
"an exception")
if x != 0:
self.fail("underflowing exp() should have returned 0")
# If this fails, probably using a strict IEEE-754 conforming libm, and x
# is +Inf afterwards. But Python wants overflows detected by default.
try:
x = math.exp(1000000000)
except OverflowError:
pass
else:
self.fail("overflowing exp() didn't trigger OverflowError")
# If this fails, it could be a puzzle. One odd possibility is that
# mathmodule.c's macros are getting confused while comparing
# Inf (HUGE_VAL) to a NaN, and artificially setting errno to ERANGE
# as a result (and so raising OverflowError instead).
try:
x = math.sqrt(-1.0)
except ValueError:
pass
else:
self.fail("sqrt(-1) didn't raise ValueError")
def test_exceptions(self):
try:
x = math.exp(-1000000000)
except:
# mathmodule.c is failing to weed out underflows from libm, or
# we've got an fp format with huge dynamic range
self.fail("underflowing exp() should not have raised "
"an exception")
if x != 0:
self.fail("underflowing exp() should have returned 0")
# If this fails, probably using a strict IEEE-754 conforming libm, and x
# is +Inf afterwards. But Python wants overflows detected by default.
try:
x = math.exp(1000000000)
except OverflowError:
pass
else:
self.fail("overflowing exp() didn't trigger OverflowError")
# If this fails, it could be a puzzle. One odd possibility is that
# mathmodule.c's macros are getting confused while comparing
# Inf (HUGE_VAL) to a NaN, and artificially setting errno to ERANGE
# as a result (and so raising OverflowError instead).
try:
x = math.sqrt(-1.0)
except ValueError:
pass
else:
self.fail("sqrt(-1) didn't raise ValueError")