def has_client_policy(
client,
scope=None,
action=None,
realm=None,
user=None,
find_resolver=True,
userObj=None,
active_only=True,
):
"""
This function returns the dictionary of policies for the given client.
1. First it searches for all policies matching (scope, action, realm) and
checks, whether the given client is contained in the policy field client.
If no policy for the given client is found it takes the policy without
a client
2. Then it strips down the returnable policies to those, that only contain
the username - UNLESS - none of the above policies contains a username
3. then we try to find resolvers in the username (OPTIONAL)
4. if nothing matched so far, we try the extended policy check
The difference to the get_policy is, that it restores the already installed
filters for an existance check
"""
policy_eval = PolicyEvaluator(get_policies())
param = {}
if realm:
param["realm"] = realm
if scope:
param["scope"] = scope
if action:
param["action"] = action
if active_only:
policy_eval.filter_for_active(state=True)
if client:
param["client"] = client
if userObj:
param["user"] = userObj
elif user:
param["user"] = user
policies = policy_eval.has_policy(param)
return policies
def _getAuthorization(scope, action):
"""
This internal function returns the Authrorizaition within some
the scope=system(or audit, monitoring, tools). for the currently
authenticated administrativ user.
This does not take into account the REALMS!
arguments:
action - this is the action
scope = system/audit/monitoring/tools
read
write
returns:
a dictionary with the following keys:
active (if policies are used)
admin (the name of the authenticated admin user)
auth (True if admin is authorized for this action)
"""
active = True
auth = False
policy_elve = PolicyEvaluator(get_policies())
p_at_all = policy_elve.has_policy({"scope": scope})
if len(p_at_all) == 0:
LOG.info(
"No policies in scope %s found. Checking "
"of scope %s be disabled.",
scope,
scope,
)
active = False
auth = True
# TODO: We may change this later to other authentication schemes
LOG.debug("[getAuthorization] now getting the admin user name")
admin_user = _getAuthenticatedUser()
LOG.debug("Evaluating policies for the user: %r", admin_user)
param = {"user": admin_user, "scope": scope, "action": action}
policies = policy_elve.set_filters(param).evaluate(policy_set=p_at_all)
LOG.debug("Found the following policies: %r", policies)
if len(list(policies.keys())) > 0:
auth = True
return {"active": active, "auth": auth, "admin": admin_user}
def new_getAuthorization(scope, action):
"""
This internal function returns the Authrorizaition within some
the scope=system(or audit, monitoring, tools). for the currently
authenticated administrativ user.
This does not take into account the REALMS!
arguments:
action - this is the action
scope = system/audit/monitoring/tools
read
write
returns:
a dictionary with the following keys:
active (if policies are used)
admin (the name of the authenticated admin user)
auth (True if admin is authorized for this action)
"""
active = True
auth = False
policy_elve = PolicyEvaluator(get_policies())
p_at_all = policy_elve.has_policy({'scope': scope})
if len(p_at_all) == 0:
LOG.info("No policies in scope %s found. Checking "
"of scope %s be disabled.", scope, scope)
active = False
auth = True
# TODO: We may change this later to other authentication schemes
LOG.debug("[getAuthorization] now getting the admin user name")
admin_user = _getAuthenticatedUser()
LOG.debug("Evaluating policies for the user: %s", admin_user['login'])
param = {'user': admin_user['login'],
'scope': scope,
'action': action}
policies = policy_elve.set_filters(param).evaluate(policy_set=p_at_all)
LOG.debug("Found the following policies: %r", policies)
if len(policies.keys()) > 0:
auth = True
return {'active': active,
'auth': auth,
'admin': admin_user['login']}
def new_has_client_policy(client, scope=None, action=None, realm=None,
user=None, find_resolver=True, userObj=None,
active_only=True):
'''
This function returns the dictionary of policies for the given client.
1. First it searches for all policies matching (scope, action, realm) and
checks, whether the given client is contained in the policy field client.
If no policy for the given client is found it takes the policy without
a client
2. Then it strips down the returnable policies to those, that only contain
the username - UNLESS - none of the above policies contains a username
3. then we try to find resolvers in the username (OPTIONAL)
4. if nothing matched so far, we try the extended policy check
The difference to the get_policy is, that it restores the already installed
filters for an existance check
'''
policy_eval = PolicyEvaluator(get_policies())
param = {}
if realm:
param['realm'] = realm
if scope:
param['scope'] = scope
if action:
param['action'] = action
if active_only:
policy_eval.filter_for_active(state=True)
if client:
param['client'] = client
if userObj:
param['user'] = userObj
elif user:
param['user'] = user
policies = policy_eval.has_policy(param)
return policies
