def seal_obj():
# params obj
params = EncryptionParameters()
# set params
params.set_poly_modulus("1x^4096 + 1")
params.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(4096))
params.set_plain_modulus(1 << 16)
# get context
context = SEALContext(params)
# get evaluator
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
# gen keys
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
private_key = keygen.secret_key()
# evaluator keys
ev_keys = EvaluationKeys()
keygen.generate_evaluation_keys(30, ev_keys)
# get encryptor and decryptor
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, private_key)
# float number encoder
encoder = FractionalEncoder(context.plain_modulus(),
context.poly_modulus(), 64, 32, 3)
return evaluator, encoder.encode, encoder.decode, encryptor.encrypt, decryptor.decrypt, ev_keys
def _build_context(self, config):
#set up encryption parameters and context
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus(config['poly_modulus'])
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(
config['coeff_modulus']))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 18)
context = SEALContext(parms)
return context
def example_rotation_ckks():
print("Example: Rotation / Rotation in CKKS");
#Rotations in the CKKS scheme work very similarly to rotations in BFV.
parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.CKKS)
poly_modulus_degree = 8192
parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(poly_modulus_degree)
parms.set_coeff_modulus(CoeffModulus.Create(
poly_modulus_degree, IntVector([40, 40, 40, 40, 40])))
context = SEALContext.Create(parms)
print_parameters(context)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
relin_keys = keygen.relin_keys()
gal_keys = keygen.galois_keys()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
ckks_encoder = CKKSEncoder(context)
slot_count = ckks_encoder.slot_count()
print("Number of slots: {}".format(slot_count))
step_size = 1.0 / (slot_count - 1)
input = DoubleVector(list(map(lambda x: x*step_size, range(0, slot_count))))
print_vector(input)
scale = 2.0**50
print("Encode and encrypt.")
plain = Plaintext()
ckks_encoder.encode(input, scale, plain)
encrypted = Ciphertext()
encryptor.encrypt(plain, encrypted)
rotated = Ciphertext()
print("Rotate 2 steps left.")
evaluator.rotate_vector(encrypted, 2, gal_keys, rotated)
print(" + Decrypt and decode ...... Correct.")
decryptor.decrypt(rotated, plain)
result = DoubleVector()
ckks_encoder.decode(plain, result)
print_vector(result)
def __init__(self):
# set parameters for encryption
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^2048 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(2048))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 8)
self.context = SEALContext(parms)
keygen = KeyGenerator(self.context)
self.encoder = IntegerEncoder(self.context.plain_modulus())
public_key = keygen.public_key()
self.encryptor = Encryptor(self.context, public_key)
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
self.decryptor = Decryptor(self.context, secret_key)
def config():
# PySEAL wrapper for the SEAL library is used.
# SEAL implements somewhat FHE algorithmic solutions =>
# each operation has a limit - 'invariant noise budget' in bits. Operations consume the noise budget
# at a rate determined py the encryption parameters. Additions free of noise budget consumption, multiplications are not
# Noise budget consumption is getting worse in sequential multiplications => multiplicative depth of the arithmetic circuit that needs to be evaluated.
# Noise budget in a ciphertext -> 0 => ciphertext too corrupted to be decrypted => large enough parameters to be eble to restore the result
#############
# noise_budget = log2(coeff_modulus/plain_modulus) bits (in a freshly encrypted ciphertext)
#############
#############
# noise_budget_cnsumption = log2(plain_modulus) + (other terms)
#############
params = EncryptionParameters()
# set the polynomial modulus. (1x^(power of 2) +1) - power of 2 cyclotomic polynomial
# affects the security of the scheme
# larger more secure and larger ciphertext size, computation slower
# from 1024 to 32768
##params.set_poly_modulus("1x^1024 + 1")
params.set_poly_modulus("1x^2048 + 1")
# coefficient modulus determines the noise budget of the ciphertext
# the bigger the more the budget and lower security -> increase the polynomial modulus
# choosing parameters for polynomial modulus http://HomomorphicEncryption.org
###params.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(8192))
params.set_coeff_modulus(
seal.coeff_modulus_128(2048)) #plain_modulus = k*4096+1
#~ log2(coeff_modulus/plain_modulus) (bits)
# plaintext modulus determines the size of the plaintext datatype, affects the noise budget in multiplication => keep the plaintext data type as small as possible
#65537
params.set_plain_modulus(12289)
#####For batching
###params.set_plain_modulus(65537)
#params.set_plain_modulus(2049)
#params.set_plain_modulus(8192)
# check the validity of the parameters set, performs and stores several important pre-computations
context = SEALContext(params)
# print the chosen parameters
#performance_test_st(context)
return context, params
def initialize_encryption():
print_example_banner("Example: Basics I");
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^2048 + 1")
# factor: 0xfffffffff00001.
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(2048))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 8)
context = SEALContext(parms)
print_parameters(context);
# Here we choose to create an IntegerEncoder with base b=2.
encoder = IntegerEncoder(context.plain_modulus())
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
return encryptor, evaluator, decryptor, encoder, context
def do_per_amount(amount, subtract_from=15):
"""
Called on every message in the stream
"""
print("Transaction amount ", amount)
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^2048 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(2048))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 8)
context = SEALContext(parms)
# Encode
encoder = FractionalEncoder(context.plain_modulus(),
context.poly_modulus(), 64, 32, 3)
# To create a fresh pair of keys one can call KeyGenerator::generate() at any time.
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
plain1 = encoder.encode(amount)
encoded2 = encoder.encode(subtract_from)
# Encrypt
encrypted1 = Ciphertext(parms)
encryptor.encrypt(plain1, encrypted1)
# Evaluate
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
evaluated = evaluate_subtraction_from_plain(evaluator, encrypted1,
encoded2)
# Decrypt and decode
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
plain_result = Plaintext()
decryptor.decrypt(evaluated, plain_result)
result = encoder.decode(plain_result)
str_result = "Amount left = " + str(result)
print(str_result)
return str_result
def __init__(self, poly_modulus = 2048 ,bit_strength = 128 ,plain_modulus = 1<<8, integral_coeffs = 64, fractional_coeffs = 32, fractional_base = 3):
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^{} + 1".format(poly_modulus))
if (bit_strength == 128):
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(poly_modulus))
else:
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_192(poly_modulus))
parms.set_plain_modulus(plain_modulus)
self.parms = parms
context = SEALContext(parms)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
self.encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
self.evaluator = Evaluator(context)
self.decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
self.encoder = FractionalEncoder(context.plain_modulus(), context.poly_modulus(), integral_coeffs, fractional_coeffs, fractional_base)
def with_env(cls):
parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.CKKS)
parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(POLY_MODULUS_DEGREE)
parms.set_coeff_modulus(
CoeffModulus.Create(POLY_MODULUS_DEGREE, PRIME_SIZE_LIST))
context = SEALContext.Create(parms)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
relin_keys = keygen.relin_keys()
galois_keys = keygen.galois_keys()
return cls(context=context,
public_key=public_key,
secret_key=secret_key,
relin_keys=relin_keys,
galois_keys=galois_keys,
poly_modulus_degree=POLY_MODULUS_DEGREE,
scale=SCALE)
def initialize_fractional(
poly_modulus_degree=4096,
security_level_bits=128,
plain_modulus_power_of_two=10,
plain_modulus=None,
encoder_integral_coefficients=1024,
encoder_fractional_coefficients=3072,
encoder_base=2
):
parameters = EncryptionParameters()
poly_modulus = "1x^" + str(poly_modulus_degree) + " + 1"
parameters.set_poly_modulus(poly_modulus)
if security_level_bits == 128:
parameters.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(poly_modulus_degree))
elif security_level_bits == 192:
parameters.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_192(poly_modulus_degree))
else:
parameters.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(poly_modulus_degree))
print("Info: security_level_bits unknown - using default security_level_bits = 128")
if plain_modulus is None:
plain_modulus = 1 << plain_modulus_power_of_two
parameters.set_plain_modulus(plain_modulus)
context = SEALContext(parameters)
print_parameters(context)
global encoder
encoder = FractionalEncoder(
context.plain_modulus(),
context.poly_modulus(),
encoder_integral_coefficients,
encoder_fractional_coefficients,
encoder_base
)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
global encryptor
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
global evaluator
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
global decryptor
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
global evaluation_keys
evaluation_keys = EvaluationKeys()
keygen.generate_evaluation_keys(16, evaluation_keys)
def example_basics_ii():
print_example_banner("Example: Basics II")
# In this example we explain what relinearization is, how to use it, and how
# it affects noise budget consumption.
# First we set the parameters, create a SEALContext, and generate the public
# and secret keys. We use slightly larger parameters than be fore to be able
# to do more homomorphic multiplications.
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^8192 + 1")
# The default coefficient modulus consists of the following primes:
# 0x7fffffffba0001,
# 0x7fffffffaa0001,
# 0x7fffffff7e0001,
# 0x3fffffffd60001.
# The total size is 219 bits.
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(8192))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 10)
context = SEALContext(parms)
print_parameters(context)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
# We also set up an Encryptor, Evaluator, and Decryptor here. We will
# encrypt polynomials directly in this example, so there is no need for
# an encoder.
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
# There are actually two more types of keys in SEAL: `evaluation keys' and
# `Galois keys'. Here we will discuss evaluation keys, and Galois keys will
# be discussed later in example_batching().
# In SEAL, a valid ciphertext consists of two or more polynomials with
# coefficients integers modulo the product of the primes in coeff_modulus.
# The current size of a ciphertext can be found using Ciphertext::size().
# A freshly encrypted ciphertext always has size 2.
#plain1 = Plaintext("1x^2 + 2x^1 + 3")
plain1 = Plaintext("1x^2 + 2x^1 + 3")
encrypted = Ciphertext()
print("")
print("Encrypting " + plain1.to_string() + ": ")
encryptor.encrypt(plain1, encrypted)
print("Done")
print("Size of a fresh encryption: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget in fresh encryption: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
# Homomorphic multiplication results in the output ciphertext growing in size.
# More precisely, if the input ciphertexts have size M and N, then the output
# ciphertext after homomorphic multiplication will have size M+N-1. In this
# case we square encrypted twice to observe this growth (also observe noise
# budget consumption).
evaluator.square(encrypted)
print("Size after squaring: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after squaring: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
plain2 = Plaintext()
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted, plain2)
print("Second power: " + plain2.to_string())
evaluator.square(encrypted)
print("Size after squaring: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after squaring: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
# It does not matter that the size has grown -- decryption works as usual.
# Observe from the print-out that the coefficients in the plaintext have
# grown quite large. One more squaring would cause some of them to wrap
# around plain_modulus (0x400), and as a result we would no longer obtain
# the expected result as an integer-coefficient polynomial. We can fix this
# problem to some extent by increasing plain_modulus. This would make sense,
# since we still have plenty of noise budget left.
plain2 = Plaintext()
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted, plain2)
print("Fourth power: " + plain2.to_string())
# The problem here is that homomorphic operations on large ciphertexts are
# computationally much more costly than on small ciphertexts. Specifically,
# homomorphic multiplication on input ciphertexts of size M and N will require
# O(M*N) polynomial multiplications to be performed, and an addition will
# require O(M+N) additions. Relinearization reduces the size of the ciphertexts
# after multiplication back to the initial size (2). Thus, relinearizing one
# or both inputs before the next multiplication, or e.g. before serializing the
# ciphertexts, can have a huge positive impact on performance.
# Another problem is that the noise budget consumption in multiplication is
# bigger when the input ciphertexts sizes are bigger. In a complicated
# computation the contribution of the sizes to the noise budget consumption
# can actually become the dominant term. We will point this out again below
# once we get to our example.
# Relinearization itself has both a computational cost and a noise budget cost.
# These both depend on a parameter called `decomposition bit count', which can
# be any integer at least 1 [dbc_min()] and at most 60 [dbc_max()]. A large
# decomposition bit count makes relinearization fast, but consumes more noise
# budget. A small decomposition bit count can make relinearization slower, but
# might not change the noise budget by any observable amount.
# Relinearization requires a special type of key called `evaluation keys'.
# These can be created by the KeyGenerator for any decomposition bit count.
# To relinearize a ciphertext of size M >= 2 back to size 2, we actually need
# M-2 evaluation keys. Attempting to relinearize a too large ciphertext with
# too few evaluation keys will result in an exception being thrown.
# We repeat our computation, but this time relinearize after both squarings.
# Since our ciphertext never grows past size 3 (we relinearize after every
# multiplication), it suffices to generate only one evaluation key.
# First, we need to create evaluation keys. We use a decomposition bit count
# of 16 here, which can be thought of as quite small.
ev_keys16 = EvaluationKeys()
# This function generates one single evaluation key. Another overload takes
# the number of keys to be generated as an argument, but one is all we need
# in this example (see above).
keygen.generate_evaluation_keys(16, ev_keys16)
print("")
print("Encrypting " + plain1.to_string() + ": ")
encryptor.encrypt(plain1, encrypted)
print("Done")
print("Size of a fresh encryption: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget in fresh encryption: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
evaluator.square(encrypted)
print("Size after squaring: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after squaring: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
evaluator.relinearize(encrypted, ev_keys16)
print("Size after relinearization: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after relinearizing (dbs = " +
(str)(ev_keys16.decomposition_bit_count()) + "): " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
evaluator.square(encrypted)
print("Size after second squaring: " + (str)(encrypted.size()) + " bits")
print("Noise budget after second squaring: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
evaluator.relinearize(encrypted, ev_keys16)
print("Size after relinearization: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after relinearizing (dbs = " +
(str)(ev_keys16.decomposition_bit_count()) + "): " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted, plain2)
print("Fourth power: " + plain2.to_string())
# Of course the result is still the same, but this time we actually
# used less of our noise budget. This is not surprising for two reasons:
# - We used a very small decomposition bit count, which is why
# relinearization itself did not consume the noise budget by any
# observable amount;
# - Since our ciphertext sizes remain small throughout the two
# squarings, the noise budget consumption rate in multiplication
# remains as small as possible. Recall from above that operations
# on larger ciphertexts actually cause more noise growth.
# To make matters even more clear, we repeat the computation a third time,
# now using the largest possible decomposition bit count (60). We are not
# measuring the time here, but relinearization with these evaluation keys
# is significantly faster than with ev_keys16.
ev_keys60 = EvaluationKeys()
keygen.generate_evaluation_keys(seal.dbc_max(), ev_keys60)
print("")
print("Encrypting " + plain1.to_string() + ": ")
encryptor.encrypt(plain1, encrypted)
print("Done")
print("Size of a fresh encryption: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget in fresh encryption: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
evaluator.square(encrypted)
print("Size after squaring: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after squaring: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
evaluator.relinearize(encrypted, ev_keys60)
print("Size after relinearization: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after relinearizing (dbc = " +
(str)(ev_keys60.decomposition_bit_count()) + "): " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
evaluator.square(encrypted)
print("Size after second squaring: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after second squaring: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget) + " bits")
evaluator.relinearize(encrypted, ev_keys60)
print("Size after relinearization: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after relinearizing (dbc = " +
(str)(ev_keys60.decomposition_bit_count()) + "): " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted, plain2)
print("Fourth power: " + plain2.to_string())
# Observe from the print-out that we have now used significantly more of our
# noise budget than in the two previous runs. This is again not surprising,
# since the first relinearization chops off a huge part of the noise budget.
# However, note that the second relinearization does not change the noise
# budget by any observable amount. This is very important to understand when
# optimal performance is desired: relinearization always drops the noise
# budget from the maximum (freshly encrypted ciphertext) down to a fixed
# amount depending on the encryption parameters and the decomposition bit
# count. On the other hand, homomorphic multiplication always consumes the
# noise budget from its current level. This is why the second relinearization
# does not change the noise budget anymore: it is already consumed past the
# fixed amount determinted by the decomposition bit count and the encryption
# parameters.
# We now perform a third squaring and observe an even further compounded
# decrease in the noise budget. Again, relinearization does not consume the
# noise budget at this point by any observable amount, even with the largest
# possible decomposition bit count.
evaluator.square(encrypted)
print("Size after third squaring " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after third squaring: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
evaluator.relinearize(encrypted, ev_keys60)
print("Size after relinearization: " + (str)(encrypted.size()))
print("Noise budget after relinearizing (dbc = " +
(str)(ev_keys60.decomposition_bit_count()) + "): " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)) + " bits")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted, plain2)
print("Eighth power: " + plain2.to_string())
def pickle_ciphertext():
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^2048 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(2048))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 8)
context = SEALContext(parms)
# Print the parameters that we have chosen
print_parameters(context);
encoder = IntegerEncoder(context.plain_modulus())
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
# To be able to encrypt, we need to construct an instance of Encryptor. Note that
# the Encryptor only requires the public key.
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
# Computations on the ciphertexts are performed with the Evaluator class.
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
# We will of course want to decrypt our results to verify that everything worked,
# so we need to also construct an instance of Decryptor. Note that the Decryptor
# requires the secret key.
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
# We start by encoding two integers as plaintext polynomials.
value1 = 5;
plain1 = encoder.encode(value1);
print("Encoded " + (str)(value1) + " as polynomial " + plain1.to_string() + " (plain1)")
value2 = -7;
plain2 = encoder.encode(value2);
print("Encoded " + (str)(value2) + " as polynomial " + plain2.to_string() + " (plain2)")
# Encrypting the values is easy.
encrypted1 = Ciphertext()
encrypted2 = Ciphertext()
print("Encrypting plain1: ", encrypted1)
encryptor.encrypt(plain1, encrypted1)
print("Done (encrypted1)", encrypted1)
print("Encrypting plain2: ")
encryptor.encrypt(plain2, encrypted2)
print("Done (encrypted2)")
# output = open('ciphertest.pkl', 'wb')
# dill.dumps(encrypted_save, output)
# output.close()
# encrypted1 = dill.load(open('ciphertest.pkl', 'rb'))
output = open('session.pkl', 'wb')
dill.dump_session('session.pkl')
del encrypted1
sill.load_session('session.pkl')
# To illustrate the concept of noise budget, we print the budgets in the fresh
# encryptions.
print("Noise budget in encrypted1: " + (str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted1)) + " bits")
print("Noise budget in encrypted2: " + (str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted2)) + " bits")
# As a simple example, we compute (-encrypted1 + encrypted2) * encrypted2.
# Negation is a unary operation.
evaluator.negate(encrypted1)
# Negation does not consume any noise budget.
print("Noise budget in -encrypted1: " + (str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted1)) + " bits")
# Addition can be done in-place (overwriting the first argument with the result,
# or alternatively a three-argument overload with a separate destination variable
# can be used. The in-place variants are always more efficient. Here we overwrite
# encrypted1 with the sum.
evaluator.add(encrypted1, encrypted2)
# It is instructive to think that addition sets the noise budget to the minimum
# of the input noise budgets. In this case both inputs had roughly the same
# budget going on, and the output (in encrypted1) has just slightly lower budget.
# Depending on probabilistic effects, the noise growth consumption may or may
# not be visible when measured in whole bits.
print("Noise budget in -encrypted1 + encrypted2: " + (str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted1)) + " bits")
# Finally multiply with encrypted2. Again, we use the in-place version of the
# function, overwriting encrypted1 with the product.
evaluator.multiply(encrypted1, encrypted2)
# Multiplication consumes a lot of noise budget. This is clearly seen in the
# print-out. The user can change the plain_modulus to see its effect on the
# rate of noise budget consumption.
print("Noise budget in (-encrypted1 + encrypted2) * encrypted2: " + (str)(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted1)) + " bits")
# Now we decrypt and decode our result.
plain_result = Plaintext()
print("Decrypting result: ")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted1, plain_result)
print("Done")
# Print the result plaintext polynomial.
print("Plaintext polynomial: " + plain_result.to_string())
# Decode to obtain an integer result.
print("Decoded integer: " + (str)(encoder.decode_int32(plain_result)))
if M[rowIndex][colIndex]==None:
M[rowIndex][colIndex]=Ciphertext(M[colIndex][rowIndex])
print_plain(M)
if __name__ == '__main__':
multiprocessing.freeze_support()
########################## paramaters required #################################
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^16384 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(8192))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 25)
context = SEALContext(parms)
encoderF = FractionalEncoder(context.plain_modulus(), context.poly_modulus(), 34, 30, 3)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
num_cores = multiprocessing.cpu_count() -1
N=4
def example_batch_encoder():
print("Example: Encoders / Batch Encoder")
#[BatchEncoder] (For BFV scheme only)
#
#Let N denote the poly_modulus_degree and T denote the plain_modulus. Batching
#allows the BFV plaintext polynomials to be viewed as 2-by-(N/2) matrices, with
#each element an integer modulo T. In the matrix view, encrypted operations act
#element-wise on encrypted matrices, allowing the user to obtain speeds-ups of
#several orders of magnitude in fully vectorizable computations. Thus, in all
#but the simplest computations, batching should be the preferred method to use
#with BFV, and when used properly will result in implementations outperforming
#anything done with the IntegerEncoder.
parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.BFV)
poly_modulus_degree = 8192
parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(poly_modulus_degree)
parms.set_coeff_modulus(CoeffModulus.BFVDefault(poly_modulus_degree))
#To enable batching, we need to set the plain_modulus to be a prime number
#congruent to 1 modulo 2*poly_modulus_degree. Microsoft SEAL provides a helper
#method for finding such a prime. In this example we create a 20-bit prime
#that supports batching.
parms.set_plain_modulus(PlainModulus.Batching(poly_modulus_degree, 20))
context = SEALContext.Create(parms)
print_parameters(context)
#We can verify that batching is indeed enabled by looking at the encryption
#parameter qualifiers created by SEALContext.
##HERE
qualifiers = context.qualifiers()
print("Batching enabled: {}".format(qualifiers.using_batching))
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
relin_keys = keygen.relin_keys()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
#Batching is done through an instance of the BatchEncoder class.
batch_encoder = BatchEncoder(context)
#The total number of batching `slots' equals the poly_modulus_degree, N, and
#these slots are organized into 2-by-(N/2) matrices that can be encrypted and
#computed on. Each slot contains an integer modulo plain_modulus.
slot_count = batch_encoder.slot_count()
row_size = int(slot_count / 2)
print("Plaintext matrix row size: {}".format(row_size))
#The matrix plaintext is simply given to BatchEncoder as a flattened vector
#of numbers. The first `row_size' many numbers form the first row, and the
#rest form the second row. Here we create the following matrix:
#
# [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, ..., 0 ]
# [ 4, 5, 6, 7, 0, 0, ..., 0 ]
pod_matrix = Int64Vector([0] * slot_count)
pod_matrix[0] = 0
pod_matrix[1] = 1
pod_matrix[2] = 2
pod_matrix[3] = 3
pod_matrix[row_size] = 4
pod_matrix[row_size + 1] = 5
pod_matrix[row_size + 2] = 6
pod_matrix[row_size + 3] = 7
print("Input plaintext matrix:")
print_matrix(pod_matrix, row_size)
#First we use BatchEncoder to encode the matrix into a plaintext polynomial.
plain_matrix = Plaintext()
print("Encode plaintext matrix:")
batch_encoder.encode(pod_matrix, plain_matrix)
#We can instantly decode to verify correctness of the encoding. Note that no
#encryption or decryption has yet taken place.
print(" + Decode plaintext matrix ...... Correct.")
pod_result = Int64Vector([0] * slot_count)
batch_encoder.decode(plain_matrix, pod_result)
print_matrix(pod_result, row_size)
#Next we encrypt the encoded plaintext.
encrypted_matrix = Ciphertext()
print("Encrypt plain_matrix to encrypted_matrix.")
encryptor.encrypt(plain_matrix, encrypted_matrix)
print(" + Noise budget in encrypted_matrix: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)))
#Operating on the ciphertext results in homomorphic operations being performed
#simultaneously in all 8192 slots (matrix elements). To illustrate this, we
#form another plaintext matrix
#
# [ 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, ..., 2 ]
# [ 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, ..., 2 ]
#
#and encode it into a plaintext.
pod_matrix2 = UInt64Vector([1, 2] * row_size)
plain_matrix2 = Plaintext()
batch_encoder.encode(pod_matrix2, plain_matrix2)
print("Second input plaintext matrix:")
print_matrix(pod_matrix2, row_size)
#We now add the second (plaintext) matrix to the encrypted matrix, and square
#the sum.
print("Sum, square, and relinearize.")
evaluator.add_plain_inplace(encrypted_matrix, plain_matrix2)
evaluator.square_inplace(encrypted_matrix)
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(encrypted_matrix, relin_keys)
#How much noise budget do we have left?
print(" + Noise budget in result: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)))
#We decrypt and decompose the plaintext to recover the result as a matrix.
plain_result = Plaintext()
print("Decrypt and decode result.")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_matrix, plain_result)
batch_encoder.decode(plain_result, pod_result)
print(" + Result plaintext matrix ...... Correct.")
print_matrix(pod_result, row_size)
if __name__ == '__main__':
comm = MPI.COMM_WORLD
rank = comm.Get_rank()
nworkers = comm.Get_size() - 1
workers = list(range(1, nworkers + 1))
start_time = time.time()
print("Ids of workers: ", str(workers))
print("Number of workers: ", str(nworkers))
## Generate encryption parameters at worker 1 and share them with all workers.
# Share context object with the parameter server, so that it can aggregate encrypted values.
if rank == 1:
# Initialize the parameters used for FHE
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^4096 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(
seal.coeff_modulus_128(4096)) # 128-bit security
parms.set_plain_modulus(40961)
context = SEALContext(parms)
comm.send(context, dest=0,
tag=0) # send the context to the parameter server
print("Sent context to server")
for i in workers[1:]:
print("Sent context to worker ", str(i))
comm.send(context, dest=i,
tag=0) # send the context to the other workers
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
for i in workers[1:]:
print("Sending keys to worker ", str(i))
def example_bfv_basics():
print("Example: BFV Basics")
#In this example, we demonstrate performing simple computations (a polynomial
#evaluation) on encrypted integers using the BFV encryption scheme.
#
#The first task is to set up an instance of the EncryptionParameters class.
#It is critical to understand how the different parameters behave, how they
#affect the encryption scheme, performance, and the security level. There are
#three encryption parameters that are necessary to set:
#
# - poly_modulus_degree (degree of polynomial modulus);
# - coeff_modulus ([ciphertext] coefficient modulus);
# - plain_modulus (plaintext modulus; only for the BFV scheme).
#
#The BFV scheme cannot perform arbitrary computations on encrypted data.
#Instead, each ciphertext has a specific quantity called the `invariant noise
#budget' -- or `noise budget' for short -- measured in bits. The noise budget
#in a freshly encrypted ciphertext (initial noise budget) is determined by
#the encryption parameters. Homomorphic operations consume the noise budget
#at a rate also determined by the encryption parameters. In BFV the two basic
#operations allowed on encrypted data are additions and multiplications, of
#which additions can generally be thought of as being nearly free in terms of
#noise budget consumption compared to multiplications. Since noise budget
#consumption compounds in sequential multiplications, the most significant
#factor in choosing appropriate encryption parameters is the multiplicative
#depth of the arithmetic circuit that the user wants to evaluate on encrypted
#data. Once the noise budget of a ciphertext reaches zero it becomes too
#corrupted to be decrypted. Thus, it is essential to choose the parameters to
#be large enough to support the desired computation; otherwise the result is
#impossible to make sense of even with the secret key.
parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.BFV)
#The first parameter we set is the degree of the `polynomial modulus'. This
#must be a positive power of 2, representing the degree of a power-of-two
#cyclotomic polynomial; it is not necessary to understand what this means.
#
#Larger poly_modulus_degree makes ciphertext sizes larger and all operations
#slower, but enables more complicated encrypted computations. Recommended
#values are 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384, 32768, but it is also possible
#to go beyond this range.
#
#In this example we use a relatively small polynomial modulus. Anything
#smaller than this will enable only very restricted encrypted computations.
poly_modulus_degree = 4096
parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(poly_modulus_degree)
#Next we set the [ciphertext] `coefficient modulus' (coeff_modulus). This
#parameter is a large integer, which is a product of distinct prime numbers,
#each up to 60 bits in size. It is represented as a vector of these prime
#numbers, each represented by an instance of the SmallModulus class. The
#bit-length of coeff_modulus means the sum of the bit-lengths of its prime
#factors.
#
#A larger coeff_modulus implies a larger noise budget, hence more encrypted
#computation capabilities. However, an upper bound for the total bit-length
#of the coeff_modulus is determined by the poly_modulus_degree, as follows:
#
# +----------------------------------------------------+
# | poly_modulus_degree | max coeff_modulus bit-length |
# +---------------------+------------------------------+
# | 1024 | 27 |
# | 2048 | 54 |
# | 4096 | 109 |
# | 8192 | 218 |
# | 16384 | 438 |
# | 32768 | 881 |
# +---------------------+------------------------------+
#
#These numbers can also be found in native/src/seal/util/hestdparms.h encoded
#in the function SEAL_HE_STD_PARMS_128_TC, and can also be obtained from the
#function
#
# CoeffModulus::MaxBitCount(poly_modulus_degree).
#
#For example, if poly_modulus_degree is 4096, the coeff_modulus could consist
#of three 36-bit primes (108 bits).
#
#Microsoft SEAL comes with helper functions for selecting the coeff_modulus.
#For new users the easiest way is to simply use
#
# CoeffModulus::BFVDefault(poly_modulus_degree),
#
#which returns std::vector<SmallModulus> consisting of a generally good choice
#for the given poly_modulus_degree.
parms.set_coeff_modulus(CoeffModulus.BFVDefault(poly_modulus_degree))
#The plaintext modulus can be any positive integer, even though here we take
#it to be a power of two. In fact, in many cases one might instead want it
#to be a prime number; we will see this in later examples. The plaintext
#modulus determines the size of the plaintext data type and the consumption
#of noise budget in multiplications. Thus, it is essential to try to keep the
#plaintext data type as small as possible for best performance. The noise
#budget in a freshly encrypted ciphertext is
#
# ~ log2(coeff_modulus/plain_modulus) (bits)
#
#and the noise budget consumption in a homomorphic multiplication is of the
#form log2(plain_modulus) + (other terms).
#
#The plaintext modulus is specific to the BFV scheme, and cannot be set when
#using the CKKS scheme.
parms.set_plain_modulus(1024)
#Now that all parameters are set, we are ready to construct a SEALContext
#object. This is a heavy class that checks the validity and properties of the
#parameters we just set.
context = SEALContext.Create(parms)
#Print the parameters that we have chosen.
print("Set encryption parameters and print")
print_parameters(context)
print("~~~~~~ A naive way to calculate 4(x^2+1)(x+1)^2. ~~~~~~")
#The encryption schemes in Microsoft SEAL are public key encryption schemes.
#For users unfamiliar with this terminology, a public key encryption scheme
#has a separate public key for encrypting data, and a separate secret key for
#decrypting data. This way multiple parties can encrypt data using the same
#shared public key, but only the proper recipient of the data can decrypt it
#with the secret key.
#
#We are now ready to generate the secret and public keys. For this purpose
#we need an instance of the KeyGenerator class. Constructing a KeyGenerator
#automatically generates the public and secret key, which can immediately be
#read to local variables.
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
#To be able to encrypt we need to construct an instance of Encryptor. Note
#that the Encryptor only requires the public key, as expected.
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
#Computations on the ciphertexts are performed with the Evaluator class. In
#a real use-case the Evaluator would not be constructed by the same party
#that holds the secret key.
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
#We will of course want to decrypt our results to verify that everything worked,
#so we need to also construct an instance of Decryptor. Note that the Decryptor
#requires the secret key.
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
#As an example, we evaluate the degree 4 polynomial
#
# 4x^4 + 8x^3 + 8x^2 + 8x + 4
#
#over an encrypted x = 6. The coefficients of the polynomial can be considered
#as plaintext inputs, as we will see below. The computation is done modulo the
#plain_modulus 1024.
#
#While this examples is simple and easy to understand, it does not have much
#practical value. In later examples we will demonstrate how to compute more
#efficiently on encrypted integers and real or complex numbers.
#
#Plaintexts in the BFV scheme are polynomials of degree less than the degree
#of the polynomial modulus, and coefficients integers modulo the plaintext
#modulus. For readers with background in ring theory, the plaintext space is
#the polynomial quotient ring Z_T[X]/(X^N + 1), where N is poly_modulus_degree
#and T is plain_modulus.
#
#To get started, we create a plaintext containing the constant 6. For the
#plaintext element we use a constructor that takes the desired polynomial as
#a string with coefficients represented as hexadecimal numbers.
x = 6
x_plain = Plaintext(str(x))
print("Express x = {} as a plaintext polynomial 0x{}.".format(
x, x_plain.to_string()))
#We then encrypt the plaintext, producing a ciphertext.
x_encrypted = Ciphertext()
print("Encrypt x_plain to x_encrypted.")
encryptor.encrypt(x_plain, x_encrypted)
#In Microsoft SEAL, a valid ciphertext consists of two or more polynomials
#whose coefficients are integers modulo the product of the primes in the
#coeff_modulus. The number of polynomials in a ciphertext is called its `size'
#and is given by Ciphertext::size(). A freshly encrypted ciphertext always
#has size 2.
print(" + size of freshly encrypted x: {}".format(x_encrypted.size()))
#There is plenty of noise budget left in this freshly encrypted ciphertext.
print(" + noise budget in freshly encrypted x: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(x_encrypted)))
#We decrypt the ciphertext and print the resulting plaintext in order to
#demonstrate correctness of the encryption.
x_decrypted = Plaintext()
decryptor.decrypt(x_encrypted, x_decrypted)
print(" + decryption of x_encrypted: 0x{} ...... Correct.".format(
x_decrypted.to_string()))
#When using Microsoft SEAL, it is typically advantageous to compute in a way
#that minimizes the longest chain of sequential multiplications. In other
#words, encrypted computations are best evaluated in a way that minimizes
#the multiplicative depth of the computation, because the total noise budget
#consumption is proportional to the multiplicative depth. For example, for
#our example computation it is advantageous to factorize the polynomial as
#
# 4x^4 + 8x^3 + 8x^2 + 8x + 4 = 4(x + 1)^2 * (x^2 + 1)
#
#to obtain a simple depth 2 representation. Thus, we compute (x + 1)^2 and
#(x^2 + 1) separately, before multiplying them, and multiplying by 4.
#
#First, we compute x^2 and add a plaintext "1". We can clearly see from the
#print-out that multiplication has consumed a lot of noise budget. The user
#can vary the plain_modulus parameter to see its effect on the rate of noise
#budget consumption.
print("Compute x_sq_plus_one (x^2+1).")
x_sq_plus_one = Ciphertext()
evaluator.square(x_encrypted, x_sq_plus_one)
plain_one = Plaintext("1")
evaluator.add_plain_inplace(x_sq_plus_one, plain_one)
#Encrypted multiplication results in the output ciphertext growing in size.
#More precisely, if the input ciphertexts have size M and N, then the output
#ciphertext after homomorphic multiplication will have size M+N-1. In this
#case we perform a squaring, and observe both size growth and noise budget
#consumption.
print(" + size of x_sq_plus_one: {}".format(x_sq_plus_one.size()))
print(" + noise budget in x_sq_plus_one: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(x_sq_plus_one)))
#Even though the size has grown, decryption works as usual as long as noise
#budget has not reached 0.
decrypted_result = Plaintext()
decryptor.decrypt(x_sq_plus_one, decrypted_result)
print(" + decryption of x_sq_plus_one: 0x{} ...... Correct.".format(
decrypted_result.to_string()))
#Next, we compute (x + 1)^2.
print("Compute x_plus_one_sq ((x+1)^2).")
x_plus_one_sq = Ciphertext()
evaluator.add_plain(x_encrypted, plain_one, x_plus_one_sq)
evaluator.square_inplace(x_plus_one_sq)
print(" + size of x_plus_one_sq: {}".format(x_plus_one_sq.size()))
print(" + noise budget in x_plus_one_sq: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(x_plus_one_sq)))
decryptor.decrypt(x_plus_one_sq, decrypted_result)
print(" + decryption of x_plus_one_sq: 0x{} ...... Correct.".format(
decrypted_result.to_string()))
#Finally, we multiply (x^2 + 1) * (x + 1)^2 * 4.
print("Compute encrypted_result (4(x^2+1)(x+1)^2).")
encrypted_result = Ciphertext()
plain_four = Plaintext("4")
evaluator.multiply_plain_inplace(x_sq_plus_one, plain_four)
evaluator.multiply(x_sq_plus_one, x_plus_one_sq, encrypted_result)
print(" + size of encrypted_result: {}".format(encrypted_result.size()))
print(" + noise budget in encrypted_result: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_result)))
print("NOTE: Decryption can be incorrect if noise budget is zero.")
print("~~~~~~ A better way to calculate 4(x^2+1)(x+1)^2. ~~~~~~")
#Noise budget has reached 0, which means that decryption cannot be expected
#to give the correct result. This is because both ciphertexts x_sq_plus_one
#and x_plus_one_sq consist of 3 polynomials due to the previous squaring
#operations, and homomorphic operations on large ciphertexts consume much more
#noise budget than computations on small ciphertexts. Computing on smaller
#ciphertexts is also computationally significantly cheaper.
#`Relinearization' is an operation that reduces the size of a ciphertext after
#multiplication back to the initial size, 2. Thus, relinearizing one or both
#input ciphertexts before the next multiplication can have a huge positive
#impact on both noise growth and performance, even though relinearization has
#a significant computational cost itself. It is only possible to relinearize
#size 3 ciphertexts down to size 2, so often the user would want to relinearize
#after each multiplication to keep the ciphertext sizes at 2.
#Relinearization requires special `relinearization keys', which can be thought
#of as a kind of public key. Relinearization keys can easily be created with
#the KeyGenerator.
#Relinearization is used similarly in both the BFV and the CKKS schemes, but
#in this example we continue using BFV. We repeat our computation from before,
#but this time relinearize after every multiplication.
#We use KeyGenerator::relin_keys() to create relinearization keys.
print("Generate relinearization keys.")
relin_keys = keygen.relin_keys()
#We now repeat the computation relinearizing after each multiplication.
print("Compute and relinearize x_squared (x^2),")
print("then compute x_sq_plus_one (x^2+1)")
x_squared = Ciphertext()
evaluator.square(x_encrypted, x_squared)
print(" + size of x_squared: {}".format(x_squared.size()))
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(x_squared, relin_keys)
print(" + size of x_squared (after relinearization): {}".format(
x_squared.size()))
evaluator.add_plain(x_squared, plain_one, x_sq_plus_one)
print(" + noise budget in x_sq_plus_one: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(x_sq_plus_one)))
decryptor.decrypt(x_sq_plus_one, decrypted_result)
print(" + decryption of x_sq_plus_one: 0x{} ...... Correct.".format(
decrypted_result.to_string()))
x_plus_one = Ciphertext()
print("Compute x_plus_one (x+1),")
print("then compute and relinearize x_plus_one_sq ((x+1)^2).")
evaluator.add_plain(x_encrypted, plain_one, x_plus_one)
evaluator.square(x_plus_one, x_plus_one_sq)
print(" + size of x_plus_one_sq: {}".format(x_plus_one_sq.size()))
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(x_plus_one_sq, relin_keys)
print(" + noise budget in x_plus_one_sq: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(x_plus_one_sq)))
decryptor.decrypt(x_plus_one_sq, decrypted_result)
print(" + decryption of x_plus_one_sq: 0x{} ...... Correct.".format(
decrypted_result.to_string()))
print("Compute and relinearize encrypted_result (4(x^2+1)(x+1)^2).")
evaluator.multiply_plain_inplace(x_sq_plus_one, plain_four)
evaluator.multiply(x_sq_plus_one, x_plus_one_sq, encrypted_result)
print(" + size of encrypted_result: {}".format(encrypted_result.size()))
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(encrypted_result, relin_keys)
print(" + size of encrypted_result (after relinearization): {}".format(
encrypted_result.size()))
print(" + noise budget in encrypted_result: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_result)))
print("NOTE: Notice the increase in remaining noise budget.")
#Relinearization clearly improved our noise consumption. We have still plenty
#of noise budget left, so we can expect the correct answer when decrypting.
print("Decrypt encrypted_result (4(x^2+1)(x+1)^2).")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_result, decrypted_result)
print(" + decryption of 4(x^2+1)(x+1)^2 = 0x{} ...... Correct.".format(
decrypted_result.to_string()))
def example_ckks_basics():
print("Example: CKKS Basics");
#In this example we demonstrate evaluating a polynomial function
#
# PI*x^3 + 0.4*x + 1
#
#on encrypted floating-point input data x for a set of 4096 equidistant points
#in the interval [0, 1]. This example demonstrates many of the main features
#of the CKKS scheme, but also the challenges in using it.
#
# We start by setting up the CKKS scheme.
parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.CKKS)
#We saw in `2_encoders.cpp' that multiplication in CKKS causes scales
#in ciphertexts to grow. The scale of any ciphertext must not get too close
#to the total size of coeff_modulus, or else the ciphertext simply runs out of
#room to store the scaled-up plaintext. The CKKS scheme provides a `rescale'
#functionality that can reduce the scale, and stabilize the scale expansion.
#
#Rescaling is a kind of modulus switch operation (recall `3_levels.cpp').
#As modulus switching, it removes the last of the primes from coeff_modulus,
#but as a side-effect it scales down the ciphertext by the removed prime.
#Usually we want to have perfect control over how the scales are changed,
#which is why for the CKKS scheme it is more common to use carefully selected
#primes for the coeff_modulus.
#
#More precisely, suppose that the scale in a CKKS ciphertext is S, and the
#last prime in the current coeff_modulus (for the ciphertext) is P. Rescaling
#to the next level changes the scale to S/P, and removes the prime P from the
#coeff_modulus, as usual in modulus switching. The number of primes limits
#how many rescalings can be done, and thus limits the multiplicative depth of
#the computation.
#
#It is possible to choose the initial scale freely. One good strategy can be
#to is to set the initial scale S and primes P_i in the coeff_modulus to be
#very close to each other. If ciphertexts have scale S before multiplication,
#they have scale S^2 after multiplication, and S^2/P_i after rescaling. If all
#P_i are close to S, then S^2/P_i is close to S again. This way we stabilize the
#scales to be close to S throughout the computation. Generally, for a circuit
#of depth D, we need to rescale D times, i.e., we need to be able to remove D
#primes from the coefficient modulus. Once we have only one prime left in the
#coeff_modulus, the remaining prime must be larger than S by a few bits to
#preserve the pre-decimal-point value of the plaintext.
#
#Therefore, a generally good strategy is to choose parameters for the CKKS
#scheme as follows:
#
# (1) Choose a 60-bit prime as the first prime in coeff_modulus. This will
# give the highest precision when decrypting;
# (2) Choose another 60-bit prime as the last element of coeff_modulus, as
# this will be used as the special prime and should be as large as the
# largest of the other primes;
# (3) Choose the intermediate primes to be close to each other.
#
#We use CoeffModulus::Create to generate primes of the appropriate size. Note
#that our coeff_modulus is 200 bits total, which is below the bound for our
#poly_modulus_degree: CoeffModulus::MaxBitCount(8192) returns 218.
poly_modulus_degree = 8192
parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(poly_modulus_degree)
parms.set_coeff_modulus(CoeffModulus.Create(
poly_modulus_degree, IntVector([60, 40, 40, 60])))
#We choose the initial scale to be 2^40. At the last level, this leaves us
#60-40=20 bits of precision before the decimal point, and enough (roughly
#10-20 bits) of precision after the decimal point. Since our intermediate
#primes are 40 bits (in fact, they are very close to 2^40), we can achieve
#scale stabilization as described above.
scale = 2.0**40
context = SEALContext.Create(parms)
print_parameters(context)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
relin_keys = keygen.relin_keys()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
encoder = CKKSEncoder(context)
slot_count = encoder.slot_count()
print("Number of slots: {}".format(slot_count))
step_size = 1.0 / (slot_count - 1)
input = DoubleVector(list(map(lambda x: x*step_size, range(0, slot_count))))
print("Input vector: ")
print_vector(input)
print("Evaluating polynomial PI*x^3 + 0.4x + 1 ...")
#We create plaintexts for PI, 0.4, and 1 using an overload of CKKSEncoder::encode
#that encodes the given floating-point value to every slot in the vector.
plain_coeff3 = Plaintext()
plain_coeff1 = Plaintext()
plain_coeff0 = Plaintext()
encoder.encode(3.14159265, scale, plain_coeff3)
encoder.encode(0.4, scale, plain_coeff1)
encoder.encode(1.0, scale, plain_coeff0)
x_plain = Plaintext()
print("Encode input vectors.")
encoder.encode(input, scale, x_plain)
x1_encrypted = Ciphertext()
encryptor.encrypt(x_plain, x1_encrypted)
#To compute x^3 we first compute x^2 and relinearize. However, the scale has
#now grown to 2^80.
x3_encrypted = Ciphertext()
print("Compute x^2 and relinearize:")
evaluator.square(x1_encrypted, x3_encrypted)
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(x3_encrypted, relin_keys)
print(" + Scale of x^2 before rescale: {} bits".format(log2(x3_encrypted.scale())))
#Now rescale; in addition to a modulus switch, the scale is reduced down by
#a factor equal to the prime that was switched away (40-bit prime). Hence, the
#new scale should be close to 2^40. Note, however, that the scale is not equal
#to 2^40: this is because the 40-bit prime is only close to 2^40.
print("Rescale x^2.")
evaluator.rescale_to_next_inplace(x3_encrypted)
print(" + Scale of x^2 after rescale: {} bits".format(log2(x3_encrypted.scale())))
#Now x3_encrypted is at a different level than x1_encrypted, which prevents us
#from multiplying them to compute x^3. We could simply switch x1_encrypted to
#the next parameters in the modulus switching chain. However, since we still
#need to multiply the x^3 term with PI (plain_coeff3), we instead compute PI*x
#first and multiply that with x^2 to obtain PI*x^3. To this end, we compute
#PI*x and rescale it back from scale 2^80 to something close to 2^40.
print("Compute and rescale PI*x.")
x1_encrypted_coeff3 = Ciphertext()
evaluator.multiply_plain(x1_encrypted, plain_coeff3, x1_encrypted_coeff3)
print(" + Scale of PI*x before rescale: {} bits".format(log2(x1_encrypted_coeff3.scale())))
evaluator.rescale_to_next_inplace(x1_encrypted_coeff3)
print(" + Scale of PI*x after rescale: {} bits".format(log2(x1_encrypted_coeff3.scale())))
#Since x3_encrypted and x1_encrypted_coeff3 have the same exact scale and use
#the same encryption parameters, we can multiply them together. We write the
#result to x3_encrypted, relinearize, and rescale. Note that again the scale
#is something close to 2^40, but not exactly 2^40 due to yet another scaling
#by a prime. We are down to the last level in the modulus switching chain.
print("Compute, relinearize, and rescale (PI*x)*x^2.")
evaluator.multiply_inplace(x3_encrypted, x1_encrypted_coeff3)
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(x3_encrypted, relin_keys)
print(" + Scale of PI*x^3 before rescale: {} bits".format(log2(x3_encrypted.scale())))
evaluator.rescale_to_next_inplace(x3_encrypted)
print(" + Scale of PI*x^3 after rescale: {} bits".format(log2(x3_encrypted.scale())))
#Next we compute the degree one term. All this requires is one multiply_plain
#with plain_coeff1. We overwrite x1_encrypted with the result.
print("Compute and rescale 0.4*x.")
evaluator.multiply_plain_inplace(x1_encrypted, plain_coeff1)
print(" + Scale of 0.4*x before rescale: {} bits".format(log2(x1_encrypted.scale())))
evaluator.rescale_to_next_inplace(x1_encrypted)
print(" + Scale of 0.4*x after rescale: {} bits".format(log2(x1_encrypted.scale())))
#Now we would hope to compute the sum of all three terms. However, there is
#a serious problem: the encryption parameters used by all three terms are
#different due to modulus switching from rescaling.
#
#Encrypted addition and subtraction require that the scales of the inputs are
#the same, and also that the encryption parameters (parms_id) match. If there
#is a mismatch, Evaluator will throw an exception.
print("Parameters used by all three terms are different.")
print(" + Modulus chain index for x3_encrypted: {}".format(
context.get_context_data(x3_encrypted.parms_id()).chain_index()))
print(" + Modulus chain index for x1_encrypted: {}".format(
context.get_context_data(x1_encrypted.parms_id()).chain_index()))
print(" + Modulus chain index for plain_coeff0: {}".format(
context.get_context_data(plain_coeff0.parms_id()).chain_index()))
#Let us carefully consider what the scales are at this point. We denote the
#primes in coeff_modulus as P_0, P_1, P_2, P_3, in this order. P_3 is used as
#the special modulus and is not involved in rescalings. After the computations
#above the scales in ciphertexts are:
#
# - Product x^2 has scale 2^80 and is at level 2;
# - Product PI*x has scale 2^80 and is at level 2;
# - We rescaled both down to scale 2^80/P_2 and level 1;
# - Product PI*x^3 has scale (2^80/P_2)^2;
# - We rescaled it down to scale (2^80/P_2)^2/P_1 and level 0;
# - Product 0.4*x has scale 2^80;
# - We rescaled it down to scale 2^80/P_2 and level 1;
# - The contant term 1 has scale 2^40 and is at level 2.
#
#Although the scales of all three terms are approximately 2^40, their exact
#values are different, hence they cannot be added together.
print("The exact scales of all three terms are different:")
print(" + Exact scale in PI*x^3: {0:0.10f}".format(x3_encrypted.scale()))
print(" + Exact scale in 0.4*x: {0:0.10f}".format(x1_encrypted.scale()))
print(" + Exact scale in 1: {0:0.10f}".format(plain_coeff0.scale()))
#There are many ways to fix this problem. Since P_2 and P_1 are really close
#to 2^40, we can simply "lie" to Microsoft SEAL and set the scales to be the
#same. For example, changing the scale of PI*x^3 to 2^40 simply means that we
#scale the value of PI*x^3 by 2^120/(P_2^2*P_1), which is very close to 1.
#This should not result in any noticeable error.
#
#Another option would be to encode 1 with scale 2^80/P_2, do a multiply_plain
#with 0.4*x, and finally rescale. In this case we would need to additionally
#make sure to encode 1 with appropriate encryption parameters (parms_id).
#
#In this example we will use the first (simplest) approach and simply change
#the scale of PI*x^3 and 0.4*x to 2^40.
print("Normalize scales to 2^40.")
x3_encrypted.set_scale(2.0**40)
x1_encrypted.set_scale(2.0**40)
#We still have a problem with mismatching encryption parameters. This is easy
#to fix by using traditional modulus switching (no rescaling). CKKS supports
#modulus switching just like the BFV scheme, allowing us to switch away parts
#of the coefficient modulus when it is simply not needed.
print("Normalize encryption parameters to the lowest level.")
last_parms_id = x3_encrypted.parms_id()
evaluator.mod_switch_to_inplace(x1_encrypted, last_parms_id)
evaluator.mod_switch_to_inplace(plain_coeff0, last_parms_id)
#All three ciphertexts are now compatible and can be added.
print("Compute PI*x^3 + 0.4*x + 1.")
encrypted_result = Ciphertext()
evaluator.add(x3_encrypted, x1_encrypted, encrypted_result)
evaluator.add_plain_inplace(encrypted_result, plain_coeff0)
#First print the true result.
plain_result = Plaintext()
print("Decrypt and decode PI*x^3 + 0.4x + 1.")
print(" + Expected result:")
true_result = DoubleVector(list(map(lambda x: (3.14159265 * x * x + 0.4)* x + 1, input)))
print_vector(true_result)
#Decrypt, decode, and print the result.
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_result, plain_result)
result = DoubleVector()
encoder.decode(plain_result, result)
print(" + Computed result ...... Correct.")
print_vector(result)
def example_ckks_encoder():
print("Example: Encoders / CKKS Encoder")
#[CKKSEncoder] (For CKKS scheme only)
#
#In this example we demonstrate the Cheon-Kim-Kim-Song (CKKS) scheme for
#computing on encrypted real or complex numbers. We start by creating
#encryption parameters for the CKKS scheme. There are two important
#differences compared to the BFV scheme:
#
# (1) CKKS does not use the plain_modulus encryption parameter;
# (2) Selecting the coeff_modulus in a specific way can be very important
# when using the CKKS scheme. We will explain this further in the file
# `ckks_basics.cpp'. In this example we use CoeffModulus::Create to
# generate 5 40-bit prime numbers.
parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.CKKS)
poly_modulus_degree = 8192
parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(poly_modulus_degree)
parms.set_coeff_modulus(
CoeffModulus.Create(poly_modulus_degree,
IntVector([40, 40, 40, 40, 40])))
#We create the SEALContext as usual and print the parameters.
context = SEALContext.Create(parms)
print_parameters(context)
#Keys are created the same way as for the BFV scheme.
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
relin_keys = keygen.relin_keys()
#We also set up an Encryptor, Evaluator, and Decryptor as usual.
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
#To create CKKS plaintexts we need a special encoder: there is no other way
#to create them. The IntegerEncoder and BatchEncoder cannot be used with the
#CKKS scheme. The CKKSEncoder encodes vectors of real or complex numbers into
#Plaintext objects, which can subsequently be encrypted. At a high level this
#looks a lot like what BatchEncoder does for the BFV scheme, but the theory
#behind it is completely different.
encoder = CKKSEncoder(context)
#In CKKS the number of slots is poly_modulus_degree / 2 and each slot encodes
#one real or complex number. This should be contrasted with BatchEncoder in
#the BFV scheme, where the number of slots is equal to poly_modulus_degree
#and they are arranged into a matrix with two rows.
slot_count = encoder.slot_count()
print("Number of slots: {}".format(slot_count))
#We create a small vector to encode; the CKKSEncoder will implicitly pad it
#with zeros to full size (poly_modulus_degree / 2) when encoding.
input = DoubleVector([0.0, 1.1, 2.2, 3.3])
print("Input vector: ")
print_vector(input)
#Now we encode it with CKKSEncoder. The floating-point coefficients of `input'
#will be scaled up by the parameter `scale'. This is necessary since even in
#the CKKS scheme the plaintext elements are fundamentally polynomials with
#integer coefficients. It is instructive to think of the scale as determining
#the bit-precision of the encoding; naturally it will affect the precision of
#the result.
#
#In CKKS the message is stored modulo coeff_modulus (in BFV it is stored modulo
#plain_modulus), so the scaled message must not get too close to the total size
#of coeff_modulus. In this case our coeff_modulus is quite large (200 bits) so
#we have little to worry about in this regard. For this simple example a 30-bit
#scale is more than enough.
plain = Plaintext()
scale = 2.0**30
print("Encode input vector.")
encoder.encode(input, scale, plain)
#We can instantly decode to check the correctness of encoding.
output = DoubleVector()
print(" + Decode input vector ...... Correct.")
encoder.decode(plain, output)
print_vector(output)
#The vector is encrypted the same was as in BFV.
encrypted = Ciphertext()
print("Encrypt input vector, square, and relinearize.")
encryptor.encrypt(plain, encrypted)
#Basic operations on the ciphertexts are still easy to do. Here we square the
#ciphertext, decrypt, decode, and print the result. We note also that decoding
#returns a vector of full size (poly_modulus_degree / 2); this is because of
#the implicit zero-padding mentioned above.
evaluator.square_inplace(encrypted)
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(encrypted, relin_keys)
#We notice that the scale in the result has increased. In fact, it is now the
#square of the original scale: 2^60.
print(" + Scale in squared input: {} ( {} bits)".format(
encrypted.scale(), log2(encrypted.scale())))
print("Decrypt and decode.")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted, plain)
encoder.decode(plain, output)
print(" + Result vector ...... Correct.")
print_vector(output)
class FracContext:
primes = [
0xffffffffffc0001, 0xfffffffff840001, 0xfffffffff240001,
0xffffffffe7c0001, 0xffffffffe740001, 0xffffffffe4c0001,
0xffffffffe440001, 0xffffffffe400001, 0xffffffffdbc0001,
0xffffffffd840001, 0xffffffffd680001, 0xffffffffd000001,
0xffffffffcf00001, 0xffffffffcdc0001, 0xffffffffcc40001,
0xffffffffc300001, 0xffffffffbf40001, 0xffffffffbdc0001,
0xffffffffb880001, 0xffffffffaec0001, 0xffffffffa380001,
0xffffffffa200001, 0xffffffffa0c0001, 0xffffffff9600001,
0xffffffff91c0001, 0xffffffff8f40001, 0xffffffff8680001,
0xffffffff7e40001, 0xffffffff7bc0001, 0xffffffff76c0001,
0xffffffff7680001, 0xffffffff6fc0001, 0xffffffff6880001,
0xffffffff6340001, 0xffffffff5d40001, 0xffffffff54c0001,
0xffffffff4d40001, 0xffffffff4380001, 0xffffffff3e80001,
0xffffffff37c0001, 0xffffffff36c0001, 0xffffffff2100001,
0xffffffff1d80001, 0xffffffff1cc0001, 0xffffffff1900001,
0xffffffff1740001, 0xffffffff15c0001, 0xffffffff0e80001,
0xfffffffeff80001, 0xfffffffeff40001, 0xfffffffeefc0001,
0xfffffffee8c0001, 0xfffffffede40001, 0xfffffffedcc0001,
0xfffffffed040001, 0xfffffffecf40001, 0xfffffffecec0001,
0xfffffffecb00001, 0xfffffffec380001, 0xfffffffebb40001
]
def __init__(self,
poly_modulus="1x^1024 + 1",
coef_modulus_n_primes=20,
plain_modulus=1 << 32):
"""
Set up encryption context for encoder and decoder
:param poly_modulus:
:param coef_modulus_n_primes:
:param plain_modulus:
"""
self.params = EncryptionParameters()
self.params.set_poly_modulus(poly_modulus)
self.params.set_coeff_modulus([
seal.SmallModulus(p)
for p in FracContext.primes[:coef_modulus_n_primes]
])
self.params.set_plain_modulus(plain_modulus)
self.context = SEALContext(self.params)
self.print_parameters(self.context)
self.keygen = KeyGenerator(self.context)
self.public_key = self.keygen.public_key()
self.secret_key = self.keygen.secret_key()
self.evaluator = Evaluator(self.context)
def print_parameters(self, context: SEALContext):
"""
Parameters description
:param context: SEALContext object
"""
print("/ Encryption parameters:")
print("| poly_modulus: " + context.poly_modulus().to_string())
# Print the size of the true (product) coefficient modulus
print("| coeff_modulus_size: " +
(str)(context.total_coeff_modulus().significant_bit_count()) +
" bits")
print("| plain_modulus: " + (str)(context.plain_modulus().value()))
print("| noise_standard_deviation: " +
(str)(context.noise_standard_deviation()))
def example_integer_encoder():
print("Example: Encoders / Integer Encoder")
#[IntegerEncoder] (For BFV scheme only)
#
#The IntegerEncoder encodes integers to BFV plaintext polynomials as follows.
#First, a binary expansion of the integer is computed. Next, a polynomial is
#created with the bits as coefficients. For example, the integer
#
# 26 = 2^4 + 2^3 + 2^1
#
#is encoded as the polynomial 1x^4 + 1x^3 + 1x^1. Conversely, plaintext
#polynomials are decoded by evaluating them at x=2. For negative numbers the
#IntegerEncoder simply stores all coefficients as either 0 or -1, where -1 is
#represented by the unsigned integer plain_modulus - 1 in memory.
#
#Since encrypted computations operate on the polynomials rather than on the
#encoded integers themselves, the polynomial coefficients will grow in the
#course of such computations. For example, computing the sum of the encrypted
#encoded integer 26 with itself will result in an encrypted polynomial with
#larger coefficients: 2x^4 + 2x^3 + 2x^1. Squaring the encrypted encoded
#integer 26 results also in increased coefficients due to cross-terms, namely,
#
# (2x^4 + 2x^3 + 2x^1)^2 = 1x^8 + 2x^7 + 1x^6 + 2x^5 + 2x^4 + 1x^2;
#
#further computations will quickly increase the coefficients much more.
#Decoding will still work correctly in this case (evaluating the polynomial
#at x=2), but since the coefficients of plaintext polynomials are really
#integers modulo plain_modulus, implicit reduction modulo plain_modulus may
#yield unexpected results. For example, adding 1x^4 + 1x^3 + 1x^1 to itself
#plain_modulus many times will result in the constant polynomial 0, which is
#clearly not equal to 26 * plain_modulus. It can be difficult to predict when
#such overflow will take place especially when computing several sequential
#multiplications.
#
#The IntegerEncoder is easy to understand and use for simple computations,
#and can be a good tool to experiment with for users new to Microsoft SEAL.
#However, advanced users will probably prefer more efficient approaches,
#such as the BatchEncoder or the CKKSEncoder.
parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.BFV)
poly_modulus_degree = 4096
parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(poly_modulus_degree)
parms.set_coeff_modulus(CoeffModulus.BFVDefault(poly_modulus_degree))
#There is no hidden logic behind our choice of the plain_modulus. The only
#thing that matters is that the plaintext polynomial coefficients will not
#exceed this value at any point during our computation; otherwise the result
#will be incorrect.
parms.set_plain_modulus(512)
context = SEALContext.Create(parms)
print_parameters(context)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
#We create an IntegerEncoder.
encoder = IntegerEncoder(context)
#First, we encode two integers as plaintext polynomials. Note that encoding
#is not encryption: at this point nothing is encrypted.
value1 = 5
plain1 = encoder.encode(value1)
print("Encode {} as polynomial {} (plain1), ".format(
value1, plain1.to_string()))
value2 = -7
plain2 = encoder.encode(value2)
print(" encode {} as polynomial {} (plain2)".format(
value2, plain2.to_string()))
#Now we can encrypt the plaintext polynomials.
encrypted1 = Ciphertext()
encrypted2 = Ciphertext()
print("Encrypt plain1 to encrypted1 and plain2 to encrypted2.")
encryptor.encrypt(plain1, encrypted1)
encryptor.encrypt(plain2, encrypted2)
print(" + Noise budget in encrypted1: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted1)))
print(" + Noise budget in encrypted2: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted2)))
#As a simple example, we compute (-encrypted1 + encrypted2) * encrypted2.
encryptor.encrypt(plain2, encrypted2)
encrypted_result = Ciphertext()
print(
"Compute encrypted_result = (-encrypted1 + encrypted2) * encrypted2.")
evaluator.negate(encrypted1, encrypted_result)
evaluator.add_inplace(encrypted_result, encrypted2)
evaluator.multiply_inplace(encrypted_result, encrypted2)
print(" + Noise budget in encrypted_result: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_result)))
plain_result = Plaintext()
print("Decrypt encrypted_result to plain_result.")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_result, plain_result)
#Print the result plaintext polynomial. The coefficients are not even close
#to exceeding our plain_modulus, 512.
print(" + Plaintext polynomial: {}".format(plain_result.to_string()))
#Decode to obtain an integer result.
print("Decode plain_result.")
print(" + Decoded integer: {} ...... Correct.".format(
encoder.decode_int32(plain_result)))
if testSet[i][-1] == predictions[i]:
correct += 1
return (correct / float(len(testSet))) * 100.0
#importing the dataset
print("Importing dataset...")
data = pd.read_csv('/app/Social_Network_Ads.csv')
dataset = data.iloc[:, [2, 3, 4]].values
#dataset1 = data.iloc [:, [2, 3]].values
print("Done\n\n\n")
print("Setting encryption parameters...")
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^16384 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(16384))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 12)
print("Done\n\n\n")
context = SEALContext(parms)
#print_parameters(context);
encoder = IntegerEncoder(context.plain_modulus())
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
encoder = FractionalEncoder(context.plain_modulus(), context.poly_modulus(),
2048, 32, 3)
class FheBuilder(object):
secret_key = None
public_key = None
galois_keys = None
encryptor = None
decryptor = None
def __init__(self, modulus, degree):
self.modulus = modulus
self.degree = degree
self.acceptable_degree = [1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384]
if self.degree not in self.acceptable_degree:
raise Exception(f"Get {self.degree}, but expect degree {self.acceptable_degree}")
self.parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.BFV)
self.parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(self.degree)
self.parms.set_coeff_modulus(CoeffModulus.BFVDefault(self.degree))
# self.parms.set_coeff_modulus(CoeffModulus.Create(self.degree, [60]))
self.parms.set_plain_modulus(self.modulus)
# print(self.parms.coeff_modulus()[0].value())
self.context = SEALContext.Create(self.parms)
self.keygen = KeyGenerator(self.context)
self.evaluator = Evaluator(self.context)
self.batch_encoder = BatchEncoder(self.context)
def generate_keys(self):
self.secret_key = self.keygen.secret_key()
self.public_key = self.keygen.public_key()
self.encryptor = Encryptor(self.context, self.public_key)
self.decryptor = Decryptor(self.context, self.secret_key)
def generate_galois_keys(self):
self.galois_keys = self.keygen.galois_keys()
def get_public_key_buffer(self) -> torch.Tensor:
if self.public_key is None:
self.public_key = self.keygen.public_key()
return torch_from_buffer(self.public_key)
def build_from_loaded_public_key(self):
self.encryptor = Encryptor(self.context, self.public_key)
def get_secret_key_buffer(self) -> torch.Tensor:
if self.secret_key is None:
self.secret_key = self.keygen.secret_key()
return torch_from_buffer(self.secret_key)
def build_from_loaded_secret_key(self):
self.decryptor = Decryptor(self.context, self.secret_key)
def build_enc(self, num_elem, is_cheap_init=False) -> FheEncTensor:
return FheEncTensor(num_elem, self.modulus, self.degree,
self.context, self.evaluator, self.batch_encoder, self.encryptor,
is_cheap_init=is_cheap_init)
def build_enc_from_torch(self, torch_tensor) -> FheEncTensor:
res = self.build_enc(get_prod(torch_tensor.size()))
res.encrypt_additive(torch_tensor)
return res
def build_plain(self, num_elem) -> FhePlainTensor:
return FhePlainTensor(num_elem, self.modulus, self.degree, self.context, self.evaluator, self.batch_encoder)
def build_plain_from_torch(self, torch_tensor) -> FhePlainTensor:
res = self.build_plain(get_prod(torch_tensor.size()))
res.load_from_torch(torch_tensor)
return res
def decrypt_to_torch(self, fhe_enc_tensor: FheEncTensor, dst=None, to="gpu") -> torch.Tensor:
def sub_decrypt(enc):
return enc.decrypt(self.decryptor, dst=dst, to=to)
if isinstance(fhe_enc_tensor, FheEncTensor):
return sub_decrypt(fhe_enc_tensor)
elif isinstance(fhe_enc_tensor, list):
return torch.stack(list(map(sub_decrypt, fhe_enc_tensor)))
else:
raise Exception(f"Unexpected type of fhe_enc_tensor: {fhe_enc_tensor}")
def noise_budget(self, fhe_enc_tensor: FheEncTensor, name=None):
noise_bits = self.decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(fhe_enc_tensor.cts[0])
if name is not None:
print(f"{name} noise budget {noise_bits} bits")
return noise_bits
def example_rotation_bfv():
print("Example: Rotation / Rotation in BFV")
parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.BFV)
poly_modulus_degree = 8192
parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(poly_modulus_degree)
parms.set_coeff_modulus(CoeffModulus.BFVDefault(poly_modulus_degree))
parms.set_plain_modulus(PlainModulus.Batching(poly_modulus_degree, 20))
context = SEALContext.Create(parms)
print_parameters(context)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
relin_keys = keygen.relin_keys()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
batch_encoder = BatchEncoder(context)
slot_count = batch_encoder.slot_count()
row_size = int(slot_count / 2)
print("Plaintext matrix row size: {}".format(row_size))
pod_matrix = UInt64Vector([0]*slot_count)
pod_matrix[0] = 0
pod_matrix[1] = 1
pod_matrix[2] = 2
pod_matrix[3] = 3
pod_matrix[row_size] = 4
pod_matrix[row_size + 1] = 5
pod_matrix[row_size + 2] = 6
pod_matrix[row_size + 3] = 7
print("Input plaintext matrix:")
print_matrix(pod_matrix, row_size)
#First we use BatchEncoder to encode the matrix into a plaintext. We encrypt
#the plaintext as usual.
plain_matrix = Plaintext()
print("Encode and encrypt.")
batch_encoder.encode(pod_matrix, plain_matrix)
encrypted_matrix = Ciphertext()
encryptor.encrypt(plain_matrix, encrypted_matrix)
print(" + Noise budget in fresh encryption: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)))
#Rotations require yet another type of special key called `Galois keys'. These
#are easily obtained from the KeyGenerator.
gal_keys = keygen.galois_keys()
#Now rotate both matrix rows 3 steps to the left, decrypt, decode, and print.
print("Rotate rows 3 steps left.")
evaluator.rotate_rows_inplace(encrypted_matrix, 3, gal_keys)
plain_result = Plaintext()
print(" + Noise budget after rotation: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)))
print(" + Decrypt and decode ...... Correct.")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_matrix, plain_result)
batch_encoder.decode(plain_result, pod_matrix)
print_matrix(pod_matrix, row_size)
#We can also rotate the columns, i.e., swap the rows.
print("Rotate columns.")
evaluator.rotate_columns_inplace(encrypted_matrix, gal_keys)
print(" + Noise budget after rotation: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)))
print(" + Decrypt and decode ...... Correct.")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_matrix, plain_result)
batch_encoder.decode(plain_result, pod_matrix)
print_matrix(pod_matrix, row_size)
#Finally, we rotate the rows 4 steps to the right, decrypt, decode, and print.
print("Rotate rows 4 steps right.")
evaluator.rotate_rows_inplace(encrypted_matrix, -4, gal_keys)
print(" + Noise budget after rotation: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)))
print(" + Decrypt and decode ...... Correct.")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_matrix, plain_result)
batch_encoder.decode(plain_result, pod_matrix)
print_matrix(pod_matrix, row_size)
def example_levels():
print("Example: Levels")
#In this examples we describe the concept of `levels' in BFV and CKKS and the
#related objects that represent them in Microsoft SEAL.
#
#In Microsoft SEAL a set of encryption parameters (excluding the random number
#generator) is identified uniquely by a 256-bit hash of the parameters. This
#hash is called the `parms_id' and can be easily accessed and printed at any
#time. The hash will change as soon as any of the parameters is changed.
#
#When a SEALContext is created from a given EncryptionParameters instance,
#Microsoft SEAL automatically creates a so-called `modulus switching chain',
#which is a chain of other encryption parameters derived from the original set.
#The parameters in the modulus switching chain are the same as the original
#parameters with the exception that size of the coefficient modulus is
#decreasing going down the chain. More precisely, each parameter set in the
#chain attempts to remove the last coefficient modulus prime from the
#previous set; this continues until the parameter set is no longer valid
#(e.g., plain_modulus is larger than the remaining coeff_modulus). It is easy
#to walk through the chain and access all the parameter sets. Additionally,
#each parameter set in the chain has a `chain index' that indicates its
#position in the chain so that the last set has index 0. We say that a set
#of encryption parameters, or an object carrying those encryption parameters,
#is at a higher level in the chain than another set of parameters if its the
#chain index is bigger, i.e., it is earlier in the chain.
#
#Each set of parameters in the chain involves unique pre-computations performed
#when the SEALContext is created, and stored in a SEALContext::ContextData
#object. The chain is basically a linked list of SEALContext::ContextData
#objects, and can easily be accessed through the SEALContext at any time. Each
#node can be identified by the parms_id of its specific encryption parameters
#(poly_modulus_degree remains the same but coeff_modulus varies).
parms = EncryptionParameters(scheme_type.BFV)
poly_modulus_degree = 8192
parms.set_poly_modulus_degree(poly_modulus_degree)
#In this example we use a custom coeff_modulus, consisting of 5 primes of
#sizes 50, 30, 30, 50, and 50 bits. Note that this is still OK according to
#the explanation in `1_bfv_basics.cpp'. Indeed,
#
# CoeffModulus::MaxBitCount(poly_modulus_degree)
#
#returns 218 (greater than 50+30+30+50+50=210).
#
#Due to the modulus switching chain, the order of the 5 primes is significant.
#The last prime has a special meaning and we call it the `special prime'. Thus,
#the first parameter set in the modulus switching chain is the only one that
#involves the special prime. All key objects, such as SecretKey, are created
#at this highest level. All data objects, such as Ciphertext, can be only at
#lower levels. The special prime should be as large as the largest of the
#other primes in the coeff_modulus, although this is not a strict requirement.
#
# special prime +---------+
# |
# v
#coeff_modulus: { 50, 30, 30, 50, 50 } +---+ Level 4 (all keys; `key level')
# |
# |
# coeff_modulus: { 50, 30, 30, 50 } +---+ Level 3 (highest `data level')
# |
# |
# coeff_modulus: { 50, 30, 30 } +---+ Level 2
# |
# |
# coeff_modulus: { 50, 30 } +---+ Level 1
# |
# |
# coeff_modulus: { 50 } +---+ Level 0 (lowest level)
parms.set_coeff_modulus(
CoeffModulus.Create(poly_modulus_degree,
IntVector([50, 30, 30, 50, 50])))
#In this example the plain_modulus does not play much of a role; we choose
#some reasonable value.
parms.set_plain_modulus(PlainModulus.Batching(poly_modulus_degree, 20))
context = SEALContext.Create(parms)
print_parameters(context)
#There are convenience method for accessing the SEALContext::ContextData for
#some of the most important levels:
#
# SEALContext::key_context_data(): access to key level ContextData
# SEALContext::first_context_data(): access to highest data level ContextData
# SEALContext::last_context_data(): access to lowest level ContextData
#
#We iterate over the chain and print the parms_id for each set of parameters.
print("Print the modulus switching chain.")
#First print the key level parameter information.
context_data = context.key_context_data()
print("----> Level (chain index): {} ...... key_context_data()".format(
context_data.chain_index()))
print(" parms_id: {}".format(list2hex(context_data.parms_id())))
print("coeff_modulus primes:", end=' ')
for prime in context_data.parms().coeff_modulus():
print(hex(prime.value()), end=' ')
print("")
print("\\")
print(" \\-->")
#Next iterate over the remaining (data) levels.
context_data = context.first_context_data()
while (context_data):
print(" Level (chain index): {} ".format(context_data.chain_index()),
end='')
if context_data.parms_id() == context.first_parms_id():
print(" ...... first_context_data()")
elif context_data.parms_id() == context.last_parms_id():
print(" ...... last_context_data()")
else:
print("")
print(" parms_id: {}".format(list2hex(context_data.parms_id())))
print("coeff_modulus primes:", end=' ')
for prime in context_data.parms().coeff_modulus():
print(hex(prime.value()), end=' ')
print("")
print("\\")
print(" \\-->")
#Step forward in the chain.
context_data = context_data.next_context_data()
print(" End of chain reached")
#We create some keys and check that indeed they appear at the highest level.
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
relin_keys = keygen.relin_keys()
galois_keys = keygen.galois_keys()
print("Print the parameter IDs of generated elements.")
print(" + public_key: {}".format(list2hex(public_key.parms_id())))
print(" + secret_key: {}".format(list2hex(secret_key.parms_id())))
print(" + relin_keys: {}".format(list2hex(relin_keys.parms_id())))
print(" + galois_keys: {}".format(list2hex(galois_keys.parms_id())))
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
#In the BFV scheme plaintexts do not carry a parms_id, but ciphertexts do. Note
#how the freshly encrypted ciphertext is at the highest data level.
plain = Plaintext("1x^3 + 2x^2 + 3x^1 + 4")
encrypted = Ciphertext()
encryptor.encrypt(plain, encrypted)
print(" + plain: {} (not set in BFV)".format(
list2hex(plain.parms_id())))
print(" + encrypted: {}".format(list2hex(encrypted.parms_id())))
#`Modulus switching' is a technique of changing the ciphertext parameters down
#in the chain. The function Evaluator::mod_switch_to_next always switches to
#the next level down the chain, whereas Evaluator::mod_switch_to switches to
#a parameter set down the chain corresponding to a given parms_id. However, it
#is impossible to switch up in the chain.
print("Perform modulus switching on encrypted and print.")
context_data = context.first_context_data()
print("---->")
while (context_data.next_context_data()):
print(" Level (chain index): {} ".format(context_data.chain_index()))
print(" parms_id of encrypted: {}".format(
list2hex(encrypted.parms_id())))
print(" Noise budget at this level: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)))
print("\\")
print(" \\-->")
evaluator.mod_switch_to_next_inplace(encrypted)
context_data = context_data.next_context_data()
print(" Level (chain index): {}".format(context_data.chain_index()))
print(" parms_id of encrypted: {}".format(encrypted.parms_id()))
print(" Noise budget at this level: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)))
print("\\")
print(" \\-->")
print(" End of chain reached")
#At this point it is hard to see any benefit in doing this: we lost a huge
#amount of noise budget (i.e., computational power) at each switch and seemed
#to get nothing in return. Decryption still works.
print("Decrypt still works after modulus switching.")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted, plain)
print(" + Decryption of encrypted: {} ...... Correct.".format(
plain.to_string()))
#However, there is a hidden benefit: the size of the ciphertext depends
#linearly on the number of primes in the coefficient modulus. Thus, if there
#is no need or intention to perform any further computations on a given
#ciphertext, we might as well switch it down to the smallest (last) set of
#parameters in the chain before sending it back to the secret key holder for
#decryption.
#
#Also the lost noise budget is actually not an issue at all, if we do things
#right, as we will see below.
#
#First we recreate the original ciphertext and perform some computations.
print("Computation is more efficient with modulus switching.")
print("Compute the 8th power.")
encryptor.encrypt(plain, encrypted)
print(" + Noise budget fresh: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)))
evaluator.square_inplace(encrypted)
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(encrypted, relin_keys)
print(" + Noise budget of the 2nd power: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)))
evaluator.square_inplace(encrypted)
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(encrypted, relin_keys)
print(" + Noise budget of the 4th power: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)))
#Surprisingly, in this case modulus switching has no effect at all on the
#noise budget.
evaluator.mod_switch_to_next_inplace(encrypted)
print(" + Noise budget after modulus switching: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)))
#This means that there is no harm at all in dropping some of the coefficient
#modulus after doing enough computations. In some cases one might want to
#switch to a lower level slightly earlier, actually sacrificing some of the
#noise budget in the process, to gain computational performance from having
#smaller parameters. We see from the print-out that the next modulus switch
#should be done ideally when the noise budget is down to around 25 bits.
evaluator.square_inplace(encrypted)
evaluator.relinearize_inplace(encrypted, relin_keys)
print(" + Noise budget of the 8th power: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)))
evaluator.mod_switch_to_next_inplace(encrypted)
print(" + Noise budget after modulus switching: {} bits".format(
decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted)))
#At this point the ciphertext still decrypts correctly, has very small size,
#and the computation was as efficient as possible. Note that the decryptor
#can be used to decrypt a ciphertext at any level in the modulus switching
#chain.
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted, plain)
print(" + Decryption of the 8th power (hexadecimal) ...... Correct.")
print(" {}".format(plain.to_string()))
#In BFV modulus switching is not necessary and in some cases the user might
#not want to create the modulus switching chain, except for the highest two
#levels. This can be done by passing a bool `false' to SEALContext::Create.
context = SEALContext.Create(parms, False)
#We can check that indeed the modulus switching chain has been created only
#for the highest two levels (key level and highest data level). The following
#loop should execute only once.
print("Optionally disable modulus switching chain expansion.")
print("Print the modulus switching chain.")
print("---->")
context_data = context.key_context_data()
while (context_data):
print(" Level (chain index): {}".format(context_data.chain_index()))
print(" parms_id: {}".format(list2hex(context_data.parms_id())))
print("coeff_modulus primes:", end=' ')
for prime in context_data.parms().coeff_modulus():
print(hex(prime.value()), end=' ')
print("")
print("\\")
print(" \\-->")
context_data = context_data.next_context_data()
print(" End of chain reached")
IntegerEncoder, \
FractionalEncoder, \
KeyGenerator, \
MemoryPoolHandle, \
Plaintext, \
SEALContext, \
EvaluationKeys, \
GaloisKeys, \
PolyCRTBuilder, \
ChooserEncoder, \
ChooserEvaluator, \
ChooserPoly
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^4096 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(4096))
# Note that 40961 is a prime number and 2*4096 divides 40960.
parms.set_plain_modulus(40961)
context = SEALContext(parms)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
def inner_product(cypher1, cypher2):
# We also set up an Encryptor, Evaluator, and Decryptor here.
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
for i in range(len(cypher1)):
def example_batching():
print_example_banner("Example: Batching with PolyCRTBuilder");
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^4096 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(4096))
parms.set_plain_modulus(40961)
context = SEALContext(parms)
print_parameters(context)
qualifiers = context.qualifiers()
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
gal_keys = GaloisKeys()
keygen.generate_galois_keys(30, gal_keys)
#ev_keys = EvaluationKeys()
#keygen.generate_evaluation_keys(30, ev_keys)
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
crtbuilder = PolyCRTBuilder(context)
slot_count = (int)(crtbuilder.slot_count())
row_size = (int)(slot_count / 2)
print("Plaintext matrix row size: " + (str)(row_size))
def print_matrix(matrix):
print("")
print_size = 5
current_line = " ["
for i in range(print_size):
current_line += ((str)(matrix[i]) + ", ")
current_line += ("..., ")
for i in range(row_size - print_size, row_size):
current_line += ((str)(matrix[i]))
if i != row_size-1: current_line += ", "
else: current_line += "]"
print(current_line)
current_line = " ["
for i in range(row_size, row_size + print_size):
current_line += ((str)(matrix[i]) + ", ")
current_line += ("..., ")
for i in range(2*row_size - print_size, 2*row_size):
current_line += ((str)(matrix[i]))
if i != 2*row_size-1: current_line += ", "
else: current_line += "]"
print(current_line)
print("")
# [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, ..., 0 ]
# [ 4, 5, 6, 7, 0, 0, ..., 0 ]
pod_matrix = [0]*slot_count
pod_matrix[0] = 0
pod_matrix[1] = 1
pod_matrix[2] = 2
pod_matrix[3] = 3
pod_matrix[row_size] = 4
pod_matrix[row_size + 1] = 5
pod_matrix[row_size + 2] = 6
pod_matrix[row_size + 3] = 7
print("Input plaintext matrix:")
print_matrix(pod_matrix)
plain_matrix = Plaintext()
crtbuilder.compose(pod_matrix, plain_matrix)
encrypted_matrix = Ciphertext()
print("Encrypting: ")
encryptor.encrypt(plain_matrix, encrypted_matrix)
print("Done")
print("Noise budget in fresh encryption: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)) + " bits")
pod_matrix2 = []
for i in range(slot_count): pod_matrix2.append((i % 2) + 1)
plain_matrix2 = Plaintext()
crtbuilder.compose(pod_matrix2, plain_matrix2)
print("Second input plaintext matrix:")
print_matrix(pod_matrix2)
print("Adding and squaring: ")
evaluator.add_plain(encrypted_matrix, plain_matrix2)
evaluator.square(encrypted_matrix)
evaluator.relinearize(encrypted_matrix, ev_keys)
print("Done")
print("Noise budget in result: " + (str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)) + " bits")
plain_result = Plaintext()
print("Decrypting result: ")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_matrix, plain_result)
print("Done")
crtbuilder.decompose(plain_result)
pod_result = [plain_result.coeff_at(i) for i in range(plain_result.coeff_count())]
print("Result plaintext matrix:")
print_matrix(pod_result)
encryptor.encrypt(plain_matrix, encrypted_matrix)
print("Unrotated matrix: ")
print_matrix(pod_matrix)
print("Noise budget in fresh encryption: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)) + " bits")
# Now rotate the rows to the left 3 steps, decrypt, decompose, and print.
evaluator.rotate_rows(encrypted_matrix, 3, gal_keys)
print("Rotated rows 3 steps left: ")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_matrix, plain_result)
crtbuilder.decompose(plain_result)
pod_result = [plain_result.coeff_at(i) for i in range(plain_result.coeff_count())]
print_matrix(pod_result)
print("Noise budget after rotation" +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)) + " bits")
# Rotate columns (swap rows), decrypt, decompose, and print.
evaluator.rotate_columns(encrypted_matrix, gal_keys)
print("Rotated columns: ")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_matrix, plain_result)
crtbuilder.decompose(plain_result)
pod_result = [plain_result.coeff_at(i) for i in range(plain_result.coeff_count())]
print_matrix(pod_result)
print("Noise budget after rotation: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)) + " bits")
# Rotate rows to the right 4 steps, decrypt, decompose, and print.
evaluator.rotate_rows(encrypted_matrix, -4, gal_keys)
print("Rotated rows 4 steps right: ")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_matrix, plain_result)
crtbuilder.decompose(plain_result)
pod_result = [plain_result.coeff_at(i) for i in range(plain_result.coeff_count())]
print_matrix(pod_result)
print("Noise budget after rotation: " +
(str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_matrix)) + " bits")
def dot_product():
print("Example: Weighted Average")
# In this example we demonstrate the FractionalEncoder, and use it to compute
# a weighted average of 10 encrypted rational numbers. In this computation we
# perform homomorphic multiplications of ciphertexts by plaintexts, which is
# much faster than regular multiplications of ciphertexts by ciphertexts.
# Moreover, such `plain multiplications' never increase the ciphertext size,
# which is why we have no need for evaluation keys in this example.
# We start by creating encryption parameters, setting up the SEALContext, keys,
# and other relevant objects. Since our computation has multiplicative depth of
# only two, it suffices to use a small poly_modulus.
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^2048 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(2048))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 8)
context = SEALContext(parms)
print_parameters(context)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
keygen2 = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
secret_key2 = keygen.secret_key()
# We also set up an Encryptor, Evaluator, and Decryptor here.
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key2)
# Create a vector of 10 rational numbers (as doubles).
# rational_numbers = [3.1, 4.159, 2.65, 3.5897, 9.3, 2.3, 8.46, 2.64, 3.383, 2.795]
rational_numbers = np.random.rand(10)
# Create a vector of weights.
# coefficients = [0.1, 0.05, 0.05, 0.2, 0.05, 0.3, 0.1, 0.025, 0.075, 0.05]
coefficients = np.random.rand(10)
my_result = np.dot(rational_numbers, coefficients)
# We need a FractionalEncoder to encode the rational numbers into plaintext
# polynomials. In this case we decide to reserve 64 coefficients of the
# polynomial for the integral part (low-degree terms) and expand the fractional
# part to 32 digits of precision (in base 3) (high-degree terms). These numbers
# can be changed according to the precision that is needed; note that these
# choices leave a lot of unused space in the 2048-coefficient polynomials.
encoder = FractionalEncoder(context.plain_modulus(), context.poly_modulus(), 64, 32, 3)
# We create a vector of ciphertexts for encrypting the rational numbers.
encrypted_rationals = []
rational_numbers_string = "Encoding and encrypting: "
for i in range(10):
# We create our Ciphertext objects into the vector by passing the
# encryption parameters as an argument to the constructor. This ensures
# that enough memory is allocated for a size 2 ciphertext. In this example
# our ciphertexts never grow in size (plain multiplication does not cause
# ciphertext growth), so we can expect the ciphertexts to remain in the same
# location in memory throughout the computation. In more complicated examples
# one might want to call a constructor that reserves enough memory for the
# ciphertext to grow to a specified size to avoid costly memory moves when
# multiplications and relinearizations are performed.
encrypted_rationals.append(Ciphertext(parms))
encryptor.encrypt(encoder.encode(rational_numbers[i]), encrypted_rationals[i])
rational_numbers_string += (str)(rational_numbers[i])[:6]
if i < 9: rational_numbers_string += ", "
print(rational_numbers_string)
# Next we encode the coefficients. There is no reason to encrypt these since they
# are not private data.
encoded_coefficients = []
encoded_coefficients_string = "Encoding plaintext coefficients: "
encrypted_coefficients =[]
for i in range(10):
encoded_coefficients.append(encoder.encode(coefficients[i]))
encrypted_coefficients.append(Ciphertext(parms))
encryptor.encrypt(encoded_coefficients[i], encrypted_coefficients[i])
encoded_coefficients_string += (str)(coefficients[i])[:6]
if i < 9: encoded_coefficients_string += ", "
print(encoded_coefficients_string)
# We also need to encode 0.1. Multiplication by this plaintext will have the
# effect of dividing by 10. Note that in SEAL it is impossible to divide
# ciphertext by another ciphertext, but in this way division by a plaintext is
# possible.
div_by_ten = encoder.encode(0.1)
# Now compute each multiplication.
prod_result = [Ciphertext() for i in range(10)]
prod_result2 = [Ciphertext() for i in range(10)]
print("Computing products: ")
for i in range(10):
# Note how we use plain multiplication instead of usual multiplication. The
# result overwrites the first argument in the function call.
evaluator.multiply_plain(encrypted_rationals[i], encoded_coefficients[i], prod_result[i])
evaluator.multiply(encrypted_rationals[i], encrypted_coefficients[i], prod_result2[i])
print("Done")
# To obtain the linear sum we need to still compute the sum of the ciphertexts
# in encrypted_rationals. There is an easy way to add together a vector of
# Ciphertexts.
encrypted_result = Ciphertext()
encrypted_result2 = Ciphertext()
print("Adding up all 10 ciphertexts: ")
evaluator.add_many(prod_result, encrypted_result)
evaluator.add_many(prod_result2, encrypted_result2)
print("Done")
# Perform division by 10 by plain multiplication with div_by_ten.
# print("Dividing by 10: ")
# evaluator.multiply_plain(encrypted_result, div_by_ten)
# print("Done")
# How much noise budget do we have left?
print("Noise budget in result: " + (str)(decryptor.invariant_noise_budget(encrypted_result)) + " bits")
# Decrypt, decode, and print result.
plain_result = Plaintext()
plain_result2 = Plaintext()
print("Decrypting result: ")
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_result, plain_result)
decryptor.decrypt(encrypted_result2, plain_result2)
print("Done")
result = encoder.decode(plain_result)
print("Weighted average: " + (str)(result)[:8])
result2 = encoder.decode(plain_result2)
print("Weighted average: " + (str)(result2)[:8])
print('\n\n', my_result)
def unit_test():
parms = EncryptionParameters()
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^8192 + 1")
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(8192))
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 10)
context = SEALContext(parms)
# Print the parameters that we have chosen
print_parameters(context)
encoder = FractionalEncoder(context.plain_modulus(),
context.poly_modulus(), 64, 32, 3)
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
# Computations on the ciphertexts are performed with the Evaluator class.
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
# We will of course want to decrypt our results to verify that everything worked,
# so we need to also construct an instance of Decryptor. Note that the Decryptor
# requires the secret key.
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
learningRate = 0.1
learningRate_data = encoder.encode(learningRate)
learningRate_e = Ciphertext()
encryptor.encrypt(learningRate_data, learningRate_e)
updatedVals = []
updatedVals.append(50)
updatedVals.append(50)
updatedVals_unenc = []
updatedVals_unenc.append(updatedVals[0])
updatedVals_unenc.append(updatedVals[1])
for i in range(15):
x = 1
y = 1
updatedVals = learn(x, y, evaluator, updatedVals[0], updatedVals[1],
encoder, encryptor, learningRate_e, decryptor)
ypred = updatedVals_unenc[0] * x + updatedVals_unenc[1]
error = ypred - y
updatedVals_unenc[0] = updatedVals_unenc[0] - x * error * learningRate
updatedVals_unenc[1] = updatedVals_unenc[1] - error * learningRate
print((str)(updatedVals[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals[0]) + ":" +
(str)(updatedVals_unenc[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals_unenc[0]))
x = 2
y = 3
updatedVals = learn(x, y, evaluator, updatedVals[0], updatedVals[1],
encoder, encryptor, learningRate_e, decryptor)
ypred = updatedVals_unenc[0] * x + updatedVals_unenc[1]
error = ypred - y
updatedVals_unenc[0] = updatedVals_unenc[0] - x * error * learningRate
updatedVals_unenc[1] = updatedVals_unenc[1] - error * learningRate
print((str)(updatedVals[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals[0]) + ":" +
(str)(updatedVals_unenc[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals_unenc[0]))
x = 4
y = 3
updatedVals = learn(x, y, evaluator, updatedVals[0], updatedVals[1],
encoder, encryptor, learningRate_e, decryptor)
ypred = updatedVals_unenc[0] * x + updatedVals_unenc[1]
error = ypred - y
updatedVals_unenc[0] = updatedVals_unenc[0] - x * error * learningRate
updatedVals_unenc[1] = updatedVals_unenc[1] - error * learningRate
print((str)(updatedVals[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals[0]) + ":" +
(str)(updatedVals_unenc[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals_unenc[0]))
x = 3
y = 2
updatedVals = learn(x, y, evaluator, updatedVals[0], updatedVals[1],
encoder, encryptor, learningRate_e, decryptor)
ypred = updatedVals_unenc[0] * x + updatedVals_unenc[1]
error = ypred - y
updatedVals_unenc[0] = updatedVals_unenc[0] - x * error * learningRate
updatedVals_unenc[1] = updatedVals_unenc[1] - error * learningRate
print((str)(updatedVals[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals[0]) + ":" +
(str)(updatedVals_unenc[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals_unenc[0]))
x = 5
y = 5
updatedVals = learn(x, y, evaluator, updatedVals[0], updatedVals[1],
encoder, encryptor, learningRate_e, decryptor)
ypred = updatedVals_unenc[0] * x + updatedVals_unenc[1]
error = ypred - y
updatedVals_unenc[0] = updatedVals_unenc[0] - x * error * learningRate
updatedVals_unenc[1] = updatedVals_unenc[1] - error * learningRate
print((str)(updatedVals[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals[0]) + ":" +
(str)(updatedVals_unenc[1]) + ":" + (str)(updatedVals_unenc[0]))
# but it is also possible to go beyond this.
parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^2048 + 1")
# To make parameter selection easier for the user, we have constructed sets of
# largest allowed coefficient moduli for 128-bit and 192-bit security levels
# for different choices of the polynomial modulus. These recommended parameters
# follow the Security white paper at http://HomomorphicEncryption.org. However,
# due to the complexity of this topic, we highly recommend the user to directly
# consult an expert in homomorphic encryption and RLWE-based encryption schemes
# to determine the security of their parameter choices.
# Our recommended values for the coefficient modulus can be easily accessed
# through the functions
# coeff_modulus_128bit(int)
# coeff_modulus_192bit(int)
parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(2048))
# The plaintext modulus can be any positive integer, even though here we take
# it to be a power of two.
parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 8)
# 1 << 8 is bitwise operation which means 1 shifted eight times ie 2^8=256
context = SEALContext(parms)
encoder = IntegerEncoder(context.plain_modulus())
keygen = KeyGenerator(context)
public_key = keygen.public_key()
secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
encryptor = Encryptor(context, public_key)
evaluator = Evaluator(context)
decryptor = Decryptor(context, secret_key)
class CipherMatrix:
"""
"""
def __init__(self, matrix=None):
"""
:param matrix: numpy.ndarray to be encrypted.
"""
self.parms = EncryptionParameters()
self.parms.set_poly_modulus("1x^2048 + 1")
self.parms.set_coeff_modulus(seal.coeff_modulus_128(2048))
self.parms.set_plain_modulus(1 << 8)
self.context = SEALContext(self.parms)
# self.encoder = IntegerEncoder(self.context.plain_modulus())
self.encoder = FractionalEncoder(self.context.plain_modulus(),
self.context.poly_modulus(), 64, 32,
3)
self.keygen = KeyGenerator(self.context)
self.public_key = self.keygen.public_key()
self.secret_key = self.keygen.secret_key()
self.encryptor = Encryptor(self.context, self.public_key)
self.decryptor = Decryptor(self.context, self.secret_key)
self.evaluator = Evaluator(self.context)
self._saved = False
self._encrypted = False
self._id = '{0:04d}'.format(np.random.randint(1000))
if matrix is not None:
assert len(
matrix.shape) == 2, "Only 2D numpy matrices accepted currently"
self.matrix = np.copy(matrix)
self.encrypted_matrix = np.empty(self.matrix.shape, dtype=object)
for i in range(self.matrix.shape[0]):
for j in range(self.matrix.shape[1]):
self.encrypted_matrix[i, j] = Ciphertext()
else:
self.matrix = None
self.encrypted_matrix = None
print(self._id, "Created")
def __repr__(self):
"""
:return:
"""
print("Encrypted:", self._encrypted)
if not self._encrypted:
print(self.matrix)
return ""
else:
return '[]'
def __str__(self):
"""
:return:
"""
print("| Encryption parameters:")
print("| poly_modulus: " + self.context.poly_modulus().to_string())
# Print the size of the true (product) coefficient modulus
print("| coeff_modulus_size: " + (
str)(self.context.total_coeff_modulus().significant_bit_count()) +
" bits")
print("| plain_modulus: " +
(str)(self.context.plain_modulus().value()))
print("| noise_standard_deviation: " +
(str)(self.context.noise_standard_deviation()))
if self.matrix is not None:
print(self.matrix.shape)
return str(type(self))
def __add__(self, other):
"""
:param other:
:return:
"""
assert isinstance(
other, CipherMatrix), "Can only be added with a CipherMatrix"
A_enc = self._encrypted
B_enc = other._encrypted
if A_enc:
A = self.encrypted_matrix
else:
A = self.matrix
if B_enc:
B = other.encrypted_matrix
else:
B = other.matrix
assert A.shape == B.shape, "Dimension mismatch, Matrices must be of same shape. Got {} and {}".format(
A.shape, B.shape)
shape = A.shape
result = CipherMatrix(np.zeros(shape, dtype=np.int32))
result._update_cryptors(self.get_keygen())
if A_enc:
if B_enc:
res_mat = result.encrypted_matrix
for i in range(shape[0]):
for j in range(shape[1]):
self.evaluator.add(A[i, j], B[i, j], res_mat[i, j])
result._encrypted = True
else:
res_mat = result.encrypted_matrix
for i in range(shape[0]):
for j in range(shape[1]):
self.evaluator.add_plain(A[i, j],
self.encoder.encode(B[i, j]),
res_mat[i, j])
result._encrypted = True
else:
if B_enc:
res_mat = result.encrypted_matrix
for i in range(shape[0]):
for j in range(shape[1]):
self.evaluator.add_plain(B[i, j],
self.encoder.encode(A[i, j]),
res_mat[i, j])
result._encrypted = True
else:
result.matrix = A + B
result._encrypted = False
return result
def __sub__(self, other):
"""
:param other:
:return:
"""
assert isinstance(other, CipherMatrix)
if other._encrypted:
shape = other.encrypted_matrix.shape
for i in range(shape[0]):
for j in range(shape[1]):
self.evaluator.negate(other.encrypted_matrix[i, j])
else:
other.matrix = -1 * other.matrix
return self + other
def __mul__(self, other):
"""
:param other:
:return:
"""
assert isinstance(
other, CipherMatrix), "Can only be multiplied with a CipherMatrix"
# print("LHS", self._id, "RHS", other._id)
A_enc = self._encrypted
B_enc = other._encrypted
if A_enc:
A = self.encrypted_matrix
else:
A = self.matrix
if B_enc:
B = other.encrypted_matrix
else:
B = other.matrix
Ashape = A.shape
Bshape = B.shape
assert Ashape[1] == Bshape[0], "Dimensionality mismatch"
result_shape = [Ashape[0], Bshape[1]]
result = CipherMatrix(np.zeros(shape=result_shape))
if A_enc:
if B_enc:
for i in range(Ashape[0]):
for j in range(Bshape[1]):
result_array = []
for k in range(Ashape[1]):
res = Ciphertext()
self.evaluator.multiply(A[i, k], B[k, j], res)
result_array.append(res)
self.evaluator.add_many(result_array,
result.encrypted_matrix[i, j])
result._encrypted = True
else:
for i in range(Ashape[0]):
for j in range(Bshape[1]):
result_array = []
for k in range(Ashape[1]):
res = Ciphertext()
self.evaluator.multiply_plain(
A[i, k], self.encoder.encode(B[k, j]), res)
result_array.append(res)
self.evaluator.add_many(result_array,
result.encrypted_matrix[i, j])
result._encrypted = True
else:
if B_enc:
for i in range(Ashape[0]):
for j in range(Bshape[1]):
result_array = []
for k in range(Ashape[1]):
res = Ciphertext()
self.evaluator.multiply_plain(
B[i, k], self.encoder.encode(A[k, j]), res)
result_array.append(res)
self.evaluator.add_many(result_array,
result.encrypted_matrix[i, j])
result._encrypted = True
else:
result.matrix = np.matmul(A, B)
result._encrypted = False
return result
def save(self, path):
"""
:param path:
:return:
"""
save_dir = os.path.join(path, self._id)
if self._saved:
print("CipherMatrix already saved")
else:
assert not os.path.isdir(save_dir), "Directory already exists"
os.mkdir(save_dir)
if not self._encrypted:
self.encrypt()
shape = self.encrypted_matrix.shape
for i in range(shape[0]):
for j in range(shape[1]):
element_name = str(i) + '-' + str(j) + '.ahem'
self.encrypted_matrix[i, j].save(
os.path.join(save_dir, element_name))
self.secret_key.save("/keys/" + "." + self._id + '.wheskey')
self._saved = True
return save_dir
def load(self, path, load_secret_key=False):
"""
:param path:
:param load_secret_key:
:return:
"""
self._id = path.split('/')[-1]
print("Loading Matrix:", self._id)
file_list = os.listdir(path)
index_list = [[file.split('.')[0].split('-'), file]
for file in file_list]
M = int(max([int(ind[0][0]) for ind in index_list])) + 1
N = int(max([int(ind[0][1]) for ind in index_list])) + 1
del self.encrypted_matrix
self.encrypted_matrix = np.empty([M, N], dtype=object)
for index in index_list:
i = int(index[0][0])
j = int(index[0][1])
self.encrypted_matrix[i, j] = Ciphertext()
self.encrypted_matrix[i, j].load(os.path.join(path, index[1]))
if load_secret_key:
self.secret_key.load("/keys/" + "." + self._id + '.wheskey')
self.matrix = np.empty(self.encrypted_matrix.shape)
self._encrypted = True
def encrypt(self, matrix=None, keygen=None):
"""
:param matrix:
:return:
"""
assert not self._encrypted, "Matrix already encrypted"
if matrix is not None:
assert self.matrix is None, "matrix already exists"
self.matrix = np.copy(matrix)
shape = self.matrix.shape
self.encrypted_matrix = np.empty(shape, dtype=object)
if keygen is not None:
self._update_cryptors(keygen)
for i in range(shape[0]):
for j in range(shape[1]):
val = self.encoder.encode(self.matrix[i, j])
self.encrypted_matrix[i, j] = Ciphertext()
self.encryptor.encrypt(val, self.encrypted_matrix[i, j])
self._encrypted = True
def decrypt(self, encrypted_matrix=None, keygen=None):
"""
:return:
"""
if encrypted_matrix is not None:
self.encrypted_matrix = encrypted_matrix
assert self._encrypted, "No encrypted matrix"
del self.matrix
shape = self.encrypted_matrix.shape
self.matrix = np.empty(shape)
if keygen is not None:
self._update_cryptors(keygen)
for i in range(shape[0]):
for j in range(shape[1]):
plain_text = Plaintext()
self.decryptor.decrypt(self.encrypted_matrix[i, j], plain_text)
self.matrix[i, j] = self.encoder.decode(plain_text)
self._encrypted = False
return np.copy(self.matrix)
def get_keygen(self):
"""
:return:
"""
return self.keygen
def _update_cryptors(self, keygen):
"""
:param keygen:
:return:
"""
self.keygen = keygen
self.public_key = keygen.public_key()
self.secret_key = keygen.secret_key()
self.encryptor = Encryptor(self.context, self.public_key)
self.decryptor = Decryptor(self.context, self.secret_key)
return