def result():
global text
global final_transcript
data = []
text = text.lower()
final_transcript = final_transcript.lower()
text = text.translate(str.maketrans('', '', string.punctuation))
final_transcript = final_transcript.translate(str.maketrans('', '', string.punctuation))
grade = str(int((1 - stringdist.rdlevenshtein_norm(text, final_transcript))*100)) + "%"
print(grade)
return grade
def rdlevenshtein_norm_to_array(string, array_of_strings):
g = lambda string_2: rdlevenshtein_norm(string, string_2)
return list(map(g, array_of_strings))
def test_rdlevenshtein_norm_transposition(self):
"""It should return right normalized dist when transposing involved"""
self.assertEqual(rdlevenshtein_norm('abced', 'abcde'), 0.2)
def test_rdlevenshtein_norm_substitution(self):
"""It should return right normalized dist when substitution involved"""
self.assertEqual(rdlevenshtein_norm('abcd!', 'abcde'), 0.2)
def test_rdlevenshtein_norm_matching(self):
"""It should return right normalized dist when strings match"""
self.assertEqual(rdlevenshtein_norm('abcde', 'abcde'), 0)
def Analysis():
'''
The main idea behind this is to observe and analyse
the patterns in which the CSRF tokens
are generated by server.
'''
ctr = 0 # Counter variable set to 0
# Checking if the no of tokens is greater than 1
if len(REQUEST_TOKENS) > 1:
verbout(color.RED, '\n +--------------+')
verbout(color.RED, ' | Analysis |')
verbout(color.RED, ' +--------------+\n')
print(GR + 'Proceeding for post-scan analysis of tokens gathered...')
verbout(
G, 'A total of %s tokens was discovered during the scan' %
(len(REQUEST_TOKENS)))
# The idea behind this is to generate all possible combinations (not
# considering permutations) from the given list of discovered tokens
# and generate anti-CSRF token generation pattern.
for tokenx1, tokenx2 in itertools.combinations(REQUEST_TOKENS, 2):
try:
verbout(
GR,
'Analysing 2 Anti-CSRF Tokens from gathered requests...')
verbout(color.CYAN,
' [+] First Token: ' + color.BLUE + tokenx1)
verbout(
color.ORANGE, ' [+] Shannon Entropy: ' + color.GREEN +
'%s' % (calcEntropy(tokenx1)))
verbout(color.CYAN,
' [+] Second Token: ' + color.BLUE + tokenx2)
verbout(
color.ORANGE, ' [+] Shannon Entropy: ' + color.GREEN +
'%s' % (calcEntropy(tokenx2)))
# Calculating the edit distance via Damerau Levenshtein algorithm
m = stringdist.rdlevenshtein(tokenx1, tokenx2)
verbout(
color.CYAN, ' [+] Edit Distance Calculated: ' +
color.GREY + str(m) + '%')
# Now its time to detect the alignment ratio
n = stringdist.rdlevenshtein_norm(tokenx1, tokenx2)
verbout(
color.CYAN,
' [+] Alignment Ratio Calculated: ' + color.GREY + str(n))
# If both tokens are same, then
if len(tokenx1) == len(tokenx2):
verbout(
C, 'Token length calculated is same: ' + color.ORANGE +
'Each %s bytes' % len(byteString(tokenx1)))
else:
verbout(
C, 'Token length calculated is different: ' +
color.ORANGE + 'By %s bytes' %
(len(byteString(tokenx1)) - len(byteString(tokenx2))))
time.sleep(0.5)
# In my experience with web security assessments, often the Anti-CSRF token
# is composed of two parts, one of them remains static while the other one dynamic.
#
# For example, if the Anti CSRF Tokens “837456mzy29jkd911139” for one request, the
# other is “837456mzy29jkd337221”, “837456mzy29jkd” part of the token remains same
# in both requests.
#
# The main idea behind this is to detect the static and dynamic part via DL Algorithm
# as discussed above by calculating edit distance.
p = sameSequence(tokenx1, tokenx2)
tokenx01 = tokenx1.replace(p, '')
tokenx02 = tokenx2.replace(p, '')
if n == 0.5 or m == len(tokenx1) / 2:
verbout(
GR,
'The tokens are composed of 2 parts (one static and other dynamic)... '
)
verbout(
C, 'Static Part : ' + color.GREY + p + color.END +
' | Length: ' + color.CYAN + str(len(p)))
verbout(
O, 'Dynamic Part of Token 0x1: ' + color.GREY +
tokenx01 + color.END + ' | Length: ' + color.CYAN +
str(len(tokenx01)))
verbout(
O, 'Dynamic Part of Token 0x2: ' + color.GREY +
tokenx02 + color.END + ' | Length: ' + color.CYAN +
str(len(tokenx02)))
if len(len(tokenx1) / 2) <= 6:
verbout(
color.RED,
' [-] Post-Analysis reveals that token might be ' +
color.BR + ' VULNERABLE ' + color.END + '!')
print(color.RED +
' [+] Possible CSRF Vulnerability Detected!')
print(color.ORANGE + ' [!] Vulnerability Type: ' +
color.BR + ' Weak Dynamic Part of Tokens ' +
color.END)
print(color.GREY + ' [+] Tokens can easily be ' +
color.RED + 'Forged by Bruteforcing/Guessing' +
color.END + '!\n')
VulnLogger(
'Analysis',
'Tokens can easily be Forged by Bruteforcing/Guessing.',
'[i] Token 1: ' + tokenx1 + '\n[i] Token 2: ' +
tokenx2)
elif n < 0.5 or m < len(tokenx1) / 2:
verbout(
R, 'Token distance calculated is ' + color.RED +
'less than 0.5!')
verbout(
C, 'Static Part : ' + color.GREY + p + color.END +
' | Length: ' + color.CYAN + str(len(p)))
verbout(
O, 'Dynamic Part of Token 0x1: ' + color.GREY +
tokenx01 + color.END + ' | Length: ' + color.CYAN +
str(len(tokenx01)))
verbout(
O, 'Dynamic Part of Token 0x2: ' + color.GREY +
tokenx02 + color.END + ' | Length: ' + color.CYAN +
str(len(tokenx02)))
verbout(
color.RED,
' [-] Post-Analysis reveals that token might be ' +
color.BR + ' VULNERABLE ' + color.END + '!')
print(color.GREEN +
' [+] Possible CSRF Vulnerability Detected!')
print(color.ORANGE + ' [!] Vulnerability Type: ' +
color.BR + ' Weak Dynamic Part of Tokens ' +
color.END)
print(color.GREY + ' [+] Tokens can easily be ' +
color.RED + 'Forged by Bruteforcing/Guessing' +
color.END + '!\n')
VulnLogger(
'Analysis',
'Tokens can easily be Forged by Bruteforcing/Guessing.',
'[i] Token 1: ' + tokenx1 + '\n[i] Token 2: ' +
tokenx2)
else:
verbout(
R, 'Token distance calculated is ' + color.GREEN +
'greater than 0.5!')
verbout(
C, 'Static Part : ' + color.GREY + p + color.END +
' | Length: ' + color.CYAN + str(len(p)))
verbout(
O, 'Dynamic Part of Token 0x1: ' + color.GREY +
tokenx01 + color.END + ' | Length: ' + color.CYAN +
str(len(tokenx01)))
verbout(
O, 'Dynamic Part of Token 0x2: ' + color.GREY +
tokenx02 + color.END + ' | Length: ' + color.CYAN +
str(len(tokenx02)))
verbout(
color.GREEN,
' [+] Post-Analysis reveals that tokens are ' +
color.BG + ' NOT VULNERABLE ' + color.END + '!')
print(color.ORANGE + ' [!] Vulnerability Mitigation: ' +
color.BG + ' Strong Dynamic Part of Tokens ' +
color.END)
print(color.GREY + ' [+] Tokens ' + color.GREEN +
'Cannot be Forged by Bruteforcing/Guessing' +
color.END + '!\n')
NovulLogger(
'Analysis',
'Tokens cannot be Forged by Bruteforcing/Guessing.')
time.sleep(1)
except KeyboardInterrupt:
continue
print(C + 'Post-Scan Analysis Completed!')
def fitness_(passwd, testWord):
score = stringdist.rdlevenshtein_norm(passwd, testWord)
return (1 - score) * 100
sys.exit(0)
with open(sys.argv[1], 'r') as sf:
flows = json.load(sf)
sites = {fl[0] for fl in flows}
sites.update({fl[1] for fl in flows})
with open(sys.argv[2], 'r') as lt:
topo = yaml.load(lt)
nets = [
n for n in topo['nodes'] if topo['nodes'][n]['type'] == 'edge'
]
site_map = {}
for s in sites:
dists = np.array(
[stringdist.rdlevenshtein_norm(s, n) for n in nets])
i = dists.argmin()
site_map[s] = nets[i]
traffic_flows = [{
'src_ip':
random_ip(topo['nodes'][site_map[fl[0]]]['ip-prefixes']),
'dst_ip':
random_ip(topo['nodes'][site_map[fl[1]]]['ip-prefixes']),
'start_time':
fl[2],
'end_time':
fl[3],
'volume':
fl[4]
} for fl in flows]