コード例 #1
0
def rule_match_nosem(rule_match: RuleMatch,
                     strict: bool) -> Tuple[bool, List[SemgrepError]]:
    if not rule_match.lines:
        return False, []

    # Only consider the first line of a match. This will keep consistent
    # behavior on where we expect a 'nosem' comment to exist. If we allow these
    # comments on any line of a match it will get confusing as to what finding
    # the 'nosem' is referring to.
    re_match = NOSEM_INLINE_RE.search(rule_match.lines[0])
    if re_match is None:
        return False, []

    ids_str = re_match.groupdict()["ids"]
    if ids_str is None:
        logger.verbose(
            f"found 'nosem' comment, skipping rule '{rule_match.id}' on line {rule_match.start['line']}"
        )
        return True, []

    # Strip quotes to allow for use of nosem as an HTML attribute inside tags.
    # HTML comments inside tags are not allowed by the spec.
    pattern_ids = {
        pattern_id.strip().strip("\"'")
        for pattern_id in COMMA_SEPARATED_LIST_RE.split(ids_str)
        if pattern_id.strip()
    }

    # Filter out ids that are not alphanum+dashes+underscores+periods.
    # This removes trailing symbols from comments, such as HTML comments `-->`
    # or C-like multiline comments `*/`.
    pattern_ids = set(
        filter(lambda x: not sub(r"[\w\-\.]+", "", x), pattern_ids))

    errors = []
    result = False
    for pattern_id in pattern_ids:
        if rule_match.id == pattern_id:
            logger.verbose(
                f"found 'nosem' comment with id '{pattern_id}', skipping rule '{rule_match.id}' on line {rule_match.start['line']}"
            )
            result = result or True
        else:
            message = f"found 'nosem' comment with id '{pattern_id}', but no corresponding rule trying '{rule_match.id}'"
            if strict:
                errors.append(SemgrepError(message, level=Level.WARN))
            else:
                logger.verbose(message)

    return result, errors
コード例 #2
0
def rule_match_nosem(rule_match: RuleMatch, strict: bool) -> bool:
    if not rule_match.lines:
        return False

    # Only consider the first line of a match. This will keep consistent
    # behavior on where we expect a 'nosem' comment to exist. If we allow these
    # comments on any line of a match it will get confusing as to what finding
    # the 'nosem' is referring to.
    re_match = NOSEM_INLINE_RE.search(rule_match.lines[0])
    if re_match is None:
        return False

    ids_str = re_match.groupdict()["ids"]
    if ids_str is None:
        logger.debug(
            f"found 'nosem' comment, skipping rule '{rule_match.id}' on line {rule_match.start['line']}"
        )
        return True

    pattern_ids = {
        pattern_id.strip()
        for pattern_id in COMMA_SEPARATED_LIST_RE.split(ids_str)
        if pattern_id.strip()
    }

    result = False
    for pattern_id in pattern_ids:
        if rule_match.id == pattern_id:
            logger.debug(
                f"found 'nosem' comment with id '{pattern_id}', skipping rule '{rule_match.id}' on line {rule_match.start['line']}"
            )
            result = result or True
        else:
            message = f"found 'nosem' comment with id '{pattern_id}', but no corresponding rule trying '{rule_match.id}'"
            if strict:
                raise SemgrepError(message)
            else:
                logger.debug(message)

    return result