def test_gwp():
"""Checks that GWP calculator produces correct GWPs."""
# methane uses "perturbation lifetime" for GWP calculations and feedback
# factor
assert np.round(gwp(100, 12.4, radeff.CH4, molwt.CH4, f=0.65)) == 28
# for N2O, I think the IPCC AR5 value is out by one year. Most likely
# explanation is that they have rounded off the feedback somewhere.
# This is calculated as 1-(1-0.36*(1.65)*radeff.CH4/radeff.N2O). See
# eq. 8.SM.20 in the supplement to Chapter 8, AR5
assert np.round(gwp(20, lifetime.N2O, radeff.N2O, molwt.N2O,
f=-0.071874)) == 263
assert np.round(gwp(100, lifetime.N2O, radeff.N2O, molwt.N2O,
f=-0.071874)) == 264
# Now check a nice straightforward example
assert np.round(gwp(100, lifetime.CFC11, radeff.CFC11, molwt.CFC11),
decimals=-1) == 4660
def test_gwp_newghgs():
"""Test CMIP6 GHGs recreate AR5 GWPs.
Possibly due to numerical precision, these do not agree with IPCC values
to 3 significant figures in all cases. The original GWPs were calculated
by Hodnebrog et al., using an excel spreadsheet. In many cases the
radiative efficiency in Hodnebrog is given to a high precision whereas in
the IPCC report it is typically only 2 decimal places. For the new gases
we use the high-precision values from Hodnebrog (precise, but accurate?)
but even so, differences in numerics between numpy and Excel sometimes
cause values to disagree in the third significant figure (also we don't
know the precise value of molecular weight Hodnebrog used).
So, if these calculated values agree to IPCC within 1%, they pass the test.
"""
assert 0.99 * 8900 < gwp(100, lifetime.C3F8, radeff.C3F8,
molwt.C3F8) < 1.01 * 8900
assert 0.99 * 9200 < gwp(100, lifetime.C4F10, radeff.C4F10,
molwt.C4F10) < 1.01 * 9200
assert 0.99 * 8550 < gwp(100, lifetime.C5F12, radeff.C5F12,
molwt.C5F12) < 1.01 * 8550
assert 0.99 * 7820 < gwp(100, lifetime.C7F16, radeff.C7F16,
molwt.C7F16) < 1.01 * 7820
assert 0.99 * 7620 < gwp(100, lifetime.C8F18, radeff.C8F18,
molwt.C8F18) < 1.01 * 7620
assert 0.99 * 9540 < gwp(100, lifetime.C_C4F8, radeff.C_C4F8,
molwt.C_C4F8) < 1.01 * 9540
assert 0.99 * 1650 < gwp(100, lifetime.HFC43_10MEE, radeff.HFC43_10MEE,
molwt.HFC43_10MEE) < 1.01 * 1650
assert 0.99 * 138 < gwp(100, lifetime.HFC152A, radeff.HFC152A,
molwt.HFC152A) < 1.01 * 138
assert 0.99 * 8060 < gwp(100, lifetime.HFC236FA, radeff.HFC236FA,
molwt.HFC236FA) < 1.01 * 8060
assert 0.99 * 804 < gwp(100, lifetime.HFC365MFC, radeff.HFC365MFC,
molwt.HFC365MFC) < 1.01 * 804
assert 0.99 * 16100 < gwp(100, lifetime.NF3, radeff.NF3,
molwt.NF3) < 1.01 * 16100
assert 0.99 * 4090 < gwp(100, lifetime.SO2F2, radeff.SO2F2,
molwt.SO2F2) < 1.01 * 4090
assert 0.99 * 160 < gwp(100, lifetime.CH3CCL3, radeff.CH3CCL3,
molwt.CH3CCL3) < 1.01 * 160
# these are only given to low precision in AR5 so give more generous tolerance
assert 8.5 < gwp(100, lifetime.CH2CL2, radeff.CH2CL2, molwt.CH2CL2) < 9.5
assert 15.5 < gwp(100, lifetime.CHCL3, radeff.CHCL3, molwt.CHCL3) < 16.5