d,a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d,a = p.add(d,a,c=10.0,r=5.0,i=3.0)
pipe.write("add5.glue",d,a,overwrite=True)
# the following show the difference way NMRPipe and pipe_proc handle
# when c and r or i (or both) are defined.
d,a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d,a = p.add(d,a,c=1.8,r=2.0,i=1.2)
pipe.write("mult4.glue",d,a,overwrite=True)
# SHUF
# NMRPipe does not ignore imaginary data when passed -rr2ri which can
# results in a double sized file, pipe_proc refuses to do this instead
# choosing to ignore imaginary data.
d,a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d,a = p.shuf(d,a,mode="rr2ri")
pipe.write("s8.glue",d,a,overwrite=True)
# this test will match pipe in the data portion
# but NMRPipe mis-sets the min, max parameters
d,a = pipe.read("time_real.fid")
d,a = p.shuf(d,a,mode="rr2ri")
pipe.write("s9.glue",d,a,overwrite=True)
# This function can result in nan in the array (as does pipe) and
# therefore will not return true in np.allclose()
# Also NMRPipe does not set the scaleflag parameter
d,a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d,a = p.shuf(d,a,mode="bswap")
pipe.write("s10.glue",d,a,overwrite=True)
#! /usr/bin/env python
""" Create files for shuf unit test """
import nmrglue.fileio.pipe as pipe
import nmrglue.process.pipe_proc as p
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.shuf(d, a, mode="ri2c")
pipe.write("shuf1.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.shuf(d, a, mode="c2ri")
pipe.write("shuf2.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.shuf(d, a, mode="ri2rr")
pipe.write("shuf3.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.shuf(d, a, mode="exlr")
pipe.write("shuf4.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.shuf(d, a, mode="rolr")
pipe.write("shuf5.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.shuf(d, a, mode="swap")
pipe.write("shuf6.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.add(d, a, c=10.0, r=5.0, i=3.0)
pipe.write("add5.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
# MULT
# the following show the difference way NMRPipe and pipe_proc handle
# when c and r or i (or both) are defined.
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.add(d, a, c=1.8, r=2.0, i=1.2)
pipe.write("mult4.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
# SHUF
# NMRPipe does not ignore imaginary data when passed -rr2ri which can
# results in a double sized file, pipe_proc refuses to do this instead
# choosing to ignore the imaginary data.
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.shuf(d, a, mode="rr2ri")
pipe.write("shuf8.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
# this test will match pipe in the data portion, but NMRPipe mis-sets the
# FDMIN and FDDISPMIN parameters
d, a = pipe.read("time_real.fid")
d, a = p.shuf(d, a, mode="rr2ri")
pipe.write("shuf9.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
# This function can result in nan in the array (as does pipe) and
# therefore will not return true in np.allclose()
# Also NMRPipe does not set the scaleflag parameter
d, a = pipe.read("time_complex.fid")
d, a = p.shuf(d, a, mode="bswap")
pipe.write("shuf10.glue", d, a, overwrite=True)
