def sandbox(s: Solver) -> None:
####################################################################################
# SANDBOX for playing with relaxed traces
import pickle
trns: logic.Trace = pickle.load(open("paxos_trace.p", "rb"))
diff_conjunctions = relaxed_traces.derived_rels_candidates_from_trace(
trns, [], 1, 3)
print("num candidate relations:", len(diff_conjunctions))
for diffing_conjunction in diff_conjunctions:
# print("relation:")
# for conj in diffing_conjunction:
# print("\t %s" % str(conj))
print(diffing_conjunction[1])
derrel_name = syntax.the_program.scope.fresh("nder")
(free_vars, def_expr) = diff_conjunctions[0]
def_axiom = syntax.Forall(
free_vars,
syntax.Iff(
syntax.Apply(derrel_name,
[syntax.Id(None, v.name) for v in free_vars]),
# TODO: extract pattern
def_expr))
derrel = syntax.RelationDecl(
tok=None,
name=derrel_name,
arity=[syntax.safe_cast_sort(var.sort) for var in free_vars],
mutable=True,
derived=def_axiom,
annotations=[])
# TODO: this irreversibly adds the relation to the context, wrap
derrel.resolve(syntax.the_program.scope)
syntax.the_program.decls.append(
derrel
) # TODO: hack! because RelationDecl.resolve only adds to prog.scope
s.mutable_axioms.extend([
def_axiom
]) # TODO: hack! currently we register these axioms only on solver init
print("Trying derived relation:", derrel)
# the new decrease_domain action incorporates restrictions that derived relations remain the same on active tuples
new_decrease_domain = relaxed_traces.relaxation_action_def(
syntax.the_program, fresh=False)
new_prog = relaxed_traces.replace_relaxation_action(
syntax.the_program, new_decrease_domain)
new_prog.resolve()
print(new_prog)
syntax.the_program = new_prog
trace_decl = next(syntax.the_program.traces())
trns2_o = bmc_trace(new_prog, trace_decl, s,
lambda s, ks: logic.check_solver(s, ks, minimize=True))
assert trns2_o is not None
trns2 = cast(logic.Trace, trns2_o)
print(trns2)
print()
print(
trns2.as_state(relaxed_traces.first_relax_step_idx(trns2) +
1).rel_interp[derrel])
assert not relaxed_traces.is_rel_blocking_relax(
trns2, relaxed_traces.first_relax_step_idx(trns2),
([(v, str(syntax.safe_cast_sort(v.sort)))
for v in free_vars], def_expr))
diff_conjunctions = list(
filter(
lambda candidate: relaxed_traces.is_rel_blocking_relax(
trns2, relaxed_traces.first_relax_step_idx(trns2),
([(v, str(syntax.safe_cast_sort(v.sort)))
for v in free_vars], def_expr)), diff_conjunctions))
print("num candidate relations:", len(diff_conjunctions))
for diffing_conjunction in diff_conjunctions:
# print("relation:")
# for conj in diffing_conjunction:
# print("\t %s" % str(conj))
print(diffing_conjunction)
print()
assert False
def relax(s: Solver) -> None:
prog = syntax.the_program
new_decls: List[syntax.Decl] = [d for d in prog.sorts()]
actives: Dict[syntax.SortDecl, syntax.RelationDecl] = {}
for sort in prog.sorts():
name = prog.scope.fresh('active_' + sort.name)
r = syntax.RelationDecl(
None,
name,
arity=[syntax.UninterpretedSort(None, sort.name)],
mutable=True,
derived=None,
annotations=[])
actives[sort] = r
new_decls.append(r)
# active relations initial conditions: always true
for sort in prog.sorts():
name = prog.scope.fresh(sort.name[0].upper())
expr = syntax.Forall([syntax.SortedVar(None, name, None)],
syntax.Apply(actives[sort].name,
[syntax.Id(None, name)]))
new_decls.append(syntax.InitDecl(None, name=None, expr=expr))
for d in prog.decls:
if isinstance(d, syntax.SortDecl):
pass # already included above
elif isinstance(d, syntax.RelationDecl):
if d.derived_axiom is not None:
expr = syntax.relativize_quantifiers(actives, d.derived_axiom)
new_decls.append(
syntax.RelationDecl(None, d.name, d.arity, d.mutable, expr,
d.annotations))
else:
new_decls.append(d)
elif isinstance(d, syntax.ConstantDecl):
new_decls.append(d)
elif isinstance(d, syntax.FunctionDecl):
new_decls.append(d)
elif isinstance(d, syntax.AxiomDecl):
new_decls.append(d)
elif isinstance(d, syntax.InitDecl):
new_decls.append(d)
elif isinstance(d, syntax.DefinitionDecl):
assert not isinstance(d.body, syntax.BlockStatement), \
"relax does not support transitions written in imperative syntax"
mods, expr = d.body
expr = syntax.relativize_quantifiers(actives, expr, old=d.twostate)
if d.public:
guard = syntax.relativization_guard_for_binder(actives,
d.binder,
old=True)
expr = syntax.And(guard, expr)
new_decls.append(
syntax.DefinitionDecl(None,
d.public,
d.twostate,
d.name,
params=d.binder.vs,
body=(mods, expr)))
elif isinstance(d, syntax.InvariantDecl):
expr = syntax.relativize_quantifiers(actives, d.expr)
new_decls.append(
syntax.InvariantDecl(None,
d.name,
expr=expr,
is_safety=d.is_safety,
is_sketch=d.is_sketch))
else:
assert False, d
new_decls.append(
relaxed_traces.relaxation_action_def(prog, actives=actives,
fresh=True))
print(Program(new_decls))
def sandbox(s: Solver) -> None:
####################################################################################
# SANDBOX for playing with relaxed traces
import pickle
trns: logic.Trace = pickle.load(open("paxos_trace.p", "rb"))
diff_conjunctions = relaxed_traces.derived_rels_candidates_from_trace(
trns, [], 2, 3)
print("num candidate relations:", len(diff_conjunctions))
for diffing_conjunction in diff_conjunctions:
# print("relation:")
# for conj in diffing_conjunction:
# print("\t %s" % str(conj))
print(diffing_conjunction[1])
derrel_name = syntax.the_program.scope.fresh("nder")
(free_vars, def_expr) = diff_conjunctions[0]
def_axiom = syntax.Forall(
tuple(free_vars),
syntax.Iff(
syntax.Apply(derrel_name,
tuple(syntax.Id(v.name) for v in free_vars)),
# TODO: extract pattern
def_expr))
derrel = syntax.RelationDecl(
name=derrel_name,
arity=tuple(syntax.safe_cast_sort(var.sort) for var in free_vars),
mutable=True,
derived=def_axiom)
# TODO: this irreversibly adds the relation to the context, wrap
typechecker.typecheck_statedecl(syntax.the_program.scope, derrel)
syntax.the_program.decls.append(
derrel
) # TODO: hack! because typecheck_statedecl only adds to prog.scope
s.mutable_axioms.extend([
def_axiom
]) # TODO: hack! currently we register these axioms only on solver init
print("Trying derived relation:", derrel)
# the new decrease_domain action incorporates restrictions that derived relations remain the same on active tuples
new_decrease_domain = relaxed_traces.relaxation_action_def(
syntax.the_program, fresh=False)
new_prog = relaxed_traces.replace_relaxation_action(
syntax.the_program, new_decrease_domain)
typechecker.typecheck_program(new_prog)
print(new_prog)
syntax.the_program = new_prog
# TODO: recover this, making sure the candidate blocks the trace
# trace_decl = next(syntax.the_program.traces())
# trns2_o = bmc_trace(new_prog, trace_decl, s, lambda s, ks: logic.check_solver(s, ks, minimize=True))
# assert trns2_o is None
# migrated_trace = load_relaxed_trace_from_updr_cex(syntax.the_program, s)
import pickle
trns2_o = pickle.load(open("migrated_trace.p", "rb"))
trns2 = cast(logic.Trace, trns2_o)
print(trns2)
print()
assert not relaxed_traces.is_rel_blocking_relax(
trns2, ([(v, str(syntax.safe_cast_sort(v.sort)))
for v in free_vars], def_expr))
# for candidate in diff_conjunctions:
# print("start checking")
# print()
# if str(candidate[1]) == ('exists v0:node. member(v0, v1) & left_round(v0, v2) '
# '& !vote(v0, v2, v3) & active_node(v0)'):
# print(candidate)
# assert False
# resush = relaxed_traces.is_rel_blocking_relax_step(
# trns2, 11,
# ([(v, str(syntax.safe_cast_sort(v.sort))) for v in candidate[0]],
# candidate[1]))
# # res2 = trns2.as_state(0).eval(syntax.And(*[i.expr for i in syntax.the_program.inits()]))
#
# # resush = trns2.as_state(7).eval(syntax.And(*[i.expr for i in syntax.the_program.inits()]))
# print(resush)
# assert False
# assert False
diff_conjunctions = list(
filter(
lambda candidate: relaxed_traces.is_rel_blocking_relax(
trns2, ([(v, str(syntax.safe_cast_sort(v.sort)))
for v in candidate[0]], candidate[1])),
diff_conjunctions))
print("num candidate relations:", len(diff_conjunctions))
for diffing_conjunction in diff_conjunctions:
# print("relation:")
# for conj in diffing_conjunction:
# print("\t %s" % str(conj))
print(diffing_conjunction[1])
print()
assert False