def setUp(self):
loader = loaders.ReviewLoader(settings, num_processes=2)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.MessageLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceMessageLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.CommentLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceCommentLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.TokenLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
connections.close_all() # Hack
q1 = Q(message__review_id=1259853004)
q2 = Q(comment__patch__patchset__review_id=1259853004)
sentObjects = Sentence.objects.filter(q1 | q2)
self.tagger = taggers.MetricsTagger(
settings, num_processes=2, sentenceObjects=sentObjects,
metrics=['formality', 'informativeness', 'implicature']
)
def setUp(self):
loader = loaders.ReviewLoader(settings, num_processes=2)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.MessageLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceMessageLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.CommentLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceCommentLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
connections.close_all() # Hack
q1 = Q(message__review_id=1259853004)
q2 = Q(comment__patch__patchset__review_id=1259853004)
sentObjects = Sentence.objects.filter(q1 | q2)
self.tagger = taggers.SentimentTagger(
settings, num_processes=2, sentObjects=sentObjects
)
def setUpTestData(cls):
loader = loaders.ReviewLoader(settings, num_processes=2)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.MessageLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.CommentLoader(
settings, num_processes=2, review_ids=[1259853004]
)
_ = loader.load()
def setUp(self):
loader = loaders.ReviewLoader(settings, num_processes=2)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.MessageLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceMessageLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.CommentLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceCommentLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.TokenLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
connections.close_all() # Hack
q1 = Q(message__review_id=1259853004)
q2 = Q(comment__patch__patchset__review_id=1259853004)
sentObjects = Sentence.objects.filter(q1 | q2)
self.tagger = taggers.BaselinesTagger(
settings,
num_processes=2,
sentenceObjects=sentObjects,
metrics=[
'sent_length', 'type_token_ratio', 'pronoun_density',
'flesch_kincaid', 'stop_word_ratio', 'question_ratio',
'conceptual_similarity'
])
def setUp(self):
loader = loaders.ReviewLoader(settings, num_processes=2)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.MessageLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1318783003])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceMessageLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1318783003])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.CommentLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1318783003])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceCommentLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1318783003])
_ = loader.load()
q1 = Q(message__review_id=1318783003)
q2 = Q(comment__patch__patchset__review_id=1318783003)
sentObjects = Sentence.objects.filter(q1 | q2)
tagger = taggers.SentenceParseTagger(settings,
num_processes=2,
sentences=sentObjects)
_ = tagger.tag()
connections.close_all() # Hack
# commObjects = Comment.objects.filter(patch__patchset__review_id=1259853004)
commObjects = Comment.objects.all()
self.tagger = taggers.CommentLevelTagger(settings,
num_processes=2,
commObjects=commObjects)
def setUp(self): # pragma: no cover
loader = loaders.ReviewLoader(settings, num_processes=2)
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.MessageLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceMessageLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.CommentLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.SentenceCommentLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
loader = loaders.TokenLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
_ = loader.load()
q1 = Q(message__review_id=1259853004)
q2 = Q(comment__patch__patchset__review_id=1259853004)
self.sentObjects = Sentence.objects.filter(q1 | q2)
self.expectedFormality = [
('Code to disconnect the DevTools in kiosk mode.', {
'formal': 0.8133996729254985,
'informal': 0.18660032707450147
}),
('Did you have any place in mind where we can set the policy?', {
'formal': 0.9578748126664057,
'informal': 0.04212518733359427
}),
("Don't you think that it could make it more difficult", {
'formal': 0.9144682647190996,
'informal': 0.08553173528090041
}),
('Done.', {
'formal': 0.9560280075705169,
'informal': 0.04397199242948313
}),
('Done.', {
'formal': 0.9560280075705169,
'informal': 0.04397199242948313
}),
('I have put it there because it is the central place for the Devtools creation and as such cover all possible case.',
{
'formal': 0.010657033433948061,
'informal': 0.9893429665660519
}),
('I looked all over the code and I did not saw any place that looked good to set',
{
'formal': 0.9465330119933556,
'informal': 0.0534669880066444
}),
('I removed the comment and merged the two conditions.', {
'formal': 0.4907094516421489,
'informal': 0.5092905483578511
}),
('I though that it will fit in chrome/browser/prefs, but all the policies',
{
'formal': 0.9639167742574419,
'informal': 0.03608322574255807
}),
('I would not try to set that pref in kiosk mode.', {
'formal': 0.9866015552582938,
'informal': 0.01339844474170615
}),
('Is it possible to set the policy |prefs::kDevToolsDisabled| instead in kiosk mode?',
{
'formal': 0.9070844366402679,
'informal': 0.09291556335973206
}),
('It work for all OS (Tested it on Win,Osx,Linux) and there are already code to disable the Devtools at this place.',
{
'formal': 0.9514776006037199,
'informal': 0.048522399396280114
}),
('LGTM', {
'formal': 0.9285427839666966,
'informal': 0.07145721603330335
}),
('Looks like you need LGTM from a devtools owner.', {
'formal': 0.7236392495196992,
'informal': 0.27636075048030084
}),
('Nit: Just combine this conditional with the one below.', {
'formal': 0.8324767352560595,
'informal': 0.16752326474394053
}),
('Nit: No blank line here', {
'formal': 0.9747818625399854,
'informal': 0.025218137460014556
}),
("There's no real win from doing so (we save one conditional in one place but have to add code to set the pref elsewhere) and it would make subsequent non-kiosk runs still disable the dev tools unless we added even more code to distinguish why the pref was originally set and then unset it.",
{
'formal': 0.077391311892486,
'informal': 0.922608688107514
}),
("You can probably nuke the comment on that since it's just restating the code, rather than trying to expand it.",
{
'formal': 0.9282941109660318,
'informal': 0.07170588903396824
}),
('are a copy of input flags.', {
'formal': 0.7587524581525787,
'informal': 0.24124754184742125
}),
('lgtm', {
'formal': 0.9554786484216474,
'informal': 0.044521351578352575
}),
('lgtm', {
'formal': 0.9554786484216474,
'informal': 0.044521351578352575
}),
('policies.', {
'formal': 0.8759002711822014,
'informal': 0.12409972881779863
}),
('policy far from the DevTools creation?', {
'formal': 0.8047949436225111,
'informal': 0.19520505637748886
}),
('to associate the disconnection of the Devtools with the kiosk mode if we set this',
{
'formal': 0.9486603128100037,
'informal': 0.051339687189996264
})
]
self.expectedFormality = sorted(self.expectedFormality)
self.expectedInformativeness = [
('Code to disconnect the DevTools in kiosk mode.', {
'informative': 0.01928570933433253,
'uninformative': 0.9807142906656675
}),
('Did you have any place in mind where we can set the policy?', {
'informative': 0.9943710553240368,
'uninformative': 0.005628944675963199
}),
("Don't you think that it could make it more difficult", {
'informative': 0.9765919663093432,
'uninformative': 0.023408033690656804
}),
('Done.', {
'informative': 0.9584298402686305,
'uninformative': 0.04157015973136946
}),
('Done.', {
'informative': 0.9584298402686305,
'uninformative': 0.04157015973136946
}),
('I have put it there because it is the central place for the Devtools creation and as such cover all possible case.',
{
'informative': 0.000113915393563202,
'uninformative': 0.9998860846064368
}),
('I looked all over the code and I did not saw any place that looked good to set',
{
'informative': 0.8071936655298996,
'uninformative': 0.19280633447010043
}),
('I removed the comment and merged the two conditions.', {
'informative': 0.18404862421776477,
'uninformative': 0.8159513757822352
}),
('I though that it will fit in chrome/browser/prefs, but all the policies',
{
'informative': 0.40187787296786126,
'uninformative': 0.5981221270321387
}),
('I would not try to set that pref in kiosk mode.', {
'informative': 0.8270210951922724,
'uninformative': 0.1729789048077276
}),
('Is it possible to set the policy |prefs::kDevToolsDisabled| instead in kiosk mode?',
{
'informative': 0.9663068414179109,
'uninformative': 0.0336931585820891
}),
('It work for all OS (Tested it on Win,Osx,Linux) and there are already code to disable the Devtools at this place.',
{
'informative': 0.01380055592148155,
'uninformative': 0.9861994440785185
}),
('LGTM', {
'informative': 0.8581510193910051,
'uninformative': 0.14184898060899487
}),
('Looks like you need LGTM from a devtools owner.', {
'informative': 0.0837672060862477,
'uninformative': 0.9162327939137523
}),
('Nit: Just combine this conditional with the one below.', {
'informative': 0.279843634053512,
'uninformative': 0.720156365946488
}),
('Nit: No blank line here', {
'informative': 0.98278184552223,
'uninformative': 0.017218154477769976
}),
("There's no real win from doing so (we save one conditional in one place but have to add code to set the pref elsewhere) and it would make subsequent non-kiosk runs still disable the dev tools unless we added even more code to distinguish why the pref was originally set and then unset it.",
{
'informative': 1.0618471403402066e-05,
'uninformative': 0.9999893815285966
}),
("You can probably nuke the comment on that since it's just restating the code, rather than trying to expand it.",
{
'informative': 0.09255934177647841,
'uninformative': 0.9074406582235216
}),
('are a copy of input flags.', {
'informative': 0.13267751340537393,
'uninformative': 0.8673224865946261
}),
('lgtm', {
'informative': 0.9044983523150818,
'uninformative': 0.0955016476849182
}),
('lgtm', {
'informative': 0.9044983523150818,
'uninformative': 0.0955016476849182
}),
('policies.', {
'informative': 0.9178244259879967,
'uninformative': 0.08217557401200326
}),
('policy far from the DevTools creation?', {
'informative': 0.9929333124240544,
'uninformative': 0.0070666875759456405
}),
('to associate the disconnection of the Devtools with the kiosk mode if we set this',
{
'informative': 0.006678405478473386,
'uninformative': 0.9933215945215266
})
]
self.expectedInformativeness = sorted(self.expectedInformativeness)
self.expectedImplicature = [
('Code to disconnect the DevTools in kiosk mode.', {
'unimplicative': 0.16831943620263523,
'implicative': 0.8316805637973648
}),
('Did you have any place in mind where we can set the policy?', {
'unimplicative': 0.935002113821984,
'implicative': 0.06499788617801609
}),
("Don't you think that it could make it more difficult", {
'unimplicative': 0.9534186604863716,
'implicative': 0.04658133951362846
}),
('Done.', {
'unimplicative': 0.17913543741586524,
'implicative': 0.8208645625841348
}),
('Done.', {
'unimplicative': 0.17913543741586524,
'implicative': 0.8208645625841348
}),
('I have put it there because it is the central place for the Devtools creation and as such cover all possible case.',
{
'unimplicative': 0.17943142822265745,
'implicative': 0.8205685717773425
}),
('I looked all over the code and I did not saw any place that looked good to set',
{
'unimplicative': 0.9834895233648248,
'implicative': 0.0165104766351752
}),
('I removed the comment and merged the two conditions.', {
'unimplicative': 0.40866411018172843,
'implicative': 0.5913358898182716
}),
('I though that it will fit in chrome/browser/prefs, but all the policies',
{
'unimplicative': 0.10484345154168517,
'implicative': 0.8951565484583148
}),
('I would not try to set that pref in kiosk mode.', {
'unimplicative': 0.8993074609313083,
'implicative': 0.1006925390686917
}),
('Is it possible to set the policy |prefs::kDevToolsDisabled| instead in kiosk mode?',
{
'unimplicative': 0.6678448199566183,
'implicative': 0.3321551800433818
}),
('It work for all OS (Tested it on Win,Osx,Linux) and there are already code to disable the Devtools at this place.',
{
'unimplicative': 0.5920308854330008,
'implicative': 0.4079691145669992
}),
('LGTM', {
'unimplicative': 0.2843028313513084,
'implicative': 0.7156971686486916
}),
('Looks like you need LGTM from a devtools owner.', {
'unimplicative': 0.5325648677846784,
'implicative': 0.4674351322153217
}),
('Nit: Just combine this conditional with the one below.', {
'unimplicative': 0.5137552416726234,
'implicative': 0.4862447583273765
}),
('Nit: No blank line here', {
'unimplicative': 0.7895862275605918,
'implicative': 0.21041377243940823
}),
("There's no real win from doing so (we save one conditional in one place but have to add code to set the pref elsewhere) and it would make subsequent non-kiosk runs still disable the dev tools unless we added even more code to distinguish why the pref was originally set and then unset it.",
{
'unimplicative': 0.14697334727546862,
'implicative': 0.8530266527245314
}),
("You can probably nuke the comment on that since it's just restating the code, rather than trying to expand it.",
{
'unimplicative': 0.917784039367348,
'implicative': 0.08221596063265199
}),
('are a copy of input flags.', {
'unimplicative': 0.5944975595371269,
'implicative': 0.40550244046287315
}),
('lgtm', {
'unimplicative': 0.2798707615220236,
'implicative': 0.7201292384779764
}),
('lgtm', {
'unimplicative': 0.2798707615220236,
'implicative': 0.7201292384779764
}),
('policies.', {
'unimplicative': 0.22278433058709457,
'implicative': 0.7772156694129054
}),
('policy far from the DevTools creation?', {
'unimplicative': 0.69174193094706,
'implicative': 0.30825806905293995
}),
('to associate the disconnection of the Devtools with the kiosk mode if we set this',
{
'unimplicative': 0.40513914728341704,
'implicative': 0.594860852716583
})
]
self.expectedImplicature = sorted(self.expectedImplicature)
def setUp(self):
self.loader = loaders.MessageLoader(settings,
num_processes=2,
review_ids=[1259853004])
def handle(self, *args, **options):
"""
"""
processes = options['processes']
year = options['year']
begin = dt.now()
try:
info('loaddb Command')
info(' Years: {}'.format(settings.YEARS))
if year != 0:
settings.YEARS = [year]
loader = loaders.BugLoader(settings, processes)
count = loader.load()
info(' {:,} bugs loaded'.format(count))
loader = loaders.VulnerabilityLoader(settings, processes)
count = loader.load()
info(' {:,} vulnerabilities loaded'.format(count))
loader = loaders.ReviewLoader(settings, processes)
count = loader.load()
info(' {:,} reviews loaded'.format(count))
tagger = taggers.MissedVulnerabilityTagger(settings, processes)
count = tagger.tag()
info(' {:,} reviews missed a vulnerability'.format(count))
if year != 0:
ids = qs.query_by_year(year, 'review', True)
else:
ids = qs.query_all('review', True)
connections.close_all() # Hack
# Comments
loader = loaders.CommentLoader(settings, processes, ids)
count = loader.load()
info(' {:,} comments loaded'.format(count))
connections.close_all() # Hack
loader = loaders.SentenceCommentLoader(settings, processes, ids)
count = loader.load()
info(' {:,} sentences loaded'.format(count))
connections.close_all() # Hack
tagger = taggers.UsefulCommentTagger(settings, processes, ids)
count = tagger.tag()
info(' {:,} comments were useful'.format(count))
# Messages
connections.close_all() # Hack
loader = loaders.MessageLoader(settings, processes, ids)
count = loader.load()
info(' {:,} messages loaded'.format(count))
connections.close_all() # Hack
loader = loaders.SentenceMessageLoader(settings, processes, ids)
count = loader.load()
info(' {:,} sentences loaded'.format(count))
connections.close_all() # Hack
# Tokens
loader = loaders.TokenLoader(settings, processes, ids)
count = loader.load()
info(' {:,} tokens loaded'.format(count))
with connection.cursor() as cursor:
cursor.execute(
'REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW {};'.format('vw_review_token'))
cursor.execute(
'REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW {};'.format('vw_review_lemma'))
except KeyboardInterrupt: # pragma: no cover
warning('Attempting to abort.')
finally:
info('Time: {:.2f} mins'.format(get_elapsed(begin, dt.now())))